girl wtf is this

Love Begins
Show & Tell
Sade Olutola
Keni
taylor price
RMH
d e v o n
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
The Bright Sessions
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day

Sweet Seals For You, Always

Kiana Khansmith
Cosimo Galluzzi

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣


shark vs the universe
Today's Document

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
seen from Russia

seen from Bahrain
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Pakistan

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada

seen from Brazil

seen from Thailand
@solarflare-s
girl wtf is this

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
trying out new paints with bones
TOS | 1.13
i haaaate when im trying to identify a jumping spider on inat and all of the comparison photos are macros of the face. yes the spider is very cute. i know that. but i can't see any identifiable features which presumably is the point of this feature
by comparison photos - do you mean the photos you see while suggesting an ID within the app? I am certain I can help you here but first I'd need to know your identifications workflow.
Yes, those comparison photos! I'm going to attach an example under the readmore for the sake of space, but in essence ~8 of the 12 photos in the comparison photos for the tan jumping spider (common in my area, using as an example) are very detailed close shots that focus on the head. And those aren't necessarily useless for identification! But the average person using inat to identify something in their yard will not be seeing that spider from that perspective. It's frustrating when the overwhelming majority of the comparison photos are similar shots from the same angle, especially when it's an angle I can't reasonably see/photograph from my phone.
I mostly use inaturalist for casual observations so it's just annoying if I can't identify to a species, in which case I'll id to the largest taxon I feel comfortable with. If I'm determined enough (and have the time) I'll open the web version and look for better examples or look at bugguide or discoverlife or whatever. I just wish the feature on the app was more functional lol.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i haaaate when im trying to identify a jumping spider on inat and all of the comparison photos are macros of the face. yes the spider is very cute. i know that. but i can't see any identifiable features which presumably is the point of this feature
Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds. To seek out new life and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before!
Star Trek: The Original Series
nothing to see here! just a regular game samer!! just a normal make some noise!!!
Don't destroy the one named Kirk.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
happy moon day!!
look ive never personally been a huge fan of rpf but i do understand that it is human nature to look at people and go "hmmmm..... what if" and then chew on that thought for a bit. however if you find yourself (or your friend or your mutual) saying that you KNOW something about someone else's relationship or sexuality you have GOT to get away
an absurd number of rpf truthers cite the fact that a celeb doesn't talk about their actual romantic partner publicly as proof that their ship couple is real and then you scroll their account and every post is about how the celeb's partner is ugly and mean and using the celeb for fame. like if you can't see the connection there i sincerely think you are stupid
look ive never personally been a huge fan of rpf but i do understand that it is human nature to look at people and go "hmmmm..... what if" and then chew on that thought for a bit. however if you find yourself (or your friend or your mutual) saying that you KNOW something about someone else's relationship or sexuality you have GOT to get away
🪩 🎶 🦀 🦀 🦀 🎶 🪩
love doing something I call ‘the big leaf test’ where I put my hand on a leaf and if the leaf is bigger than my hand I go damn that’s crazy

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
They keep trying to make trek for modern sensibilities but they’re just making tos look excessively slutty
Exhibit A
I liked these tags but I had something to say about it
I already assumed that the dresses were a choice made by the female crew, mostly for my own sanity. They do show (very infrequently) women in tos wearing pants
And they show men wearing dresses in tng, but only ever in the background (unless you count the dress uniforms)
And obviously I like that these were included, but they were clearly a cop out decision.
“Yeah see men can wear dresses, women can wear pants. They just don’t choose to” reads as “of course I’m not sexist, women just like wearing tiny little dresses in the future”
And thinking about it from a late sixties perspective, many women did see more revealing clothes as an empowering choice to make. Men wanted women covered and modest, understated makeup, only exposed or done up for male enjoyment. Some women took that in the opposite direction and chose to wear more extravagant makeup, revealing clothing, and brighter colors. It was a progressive time, and some of the choices made in an attempt to highlight that in the show did not age well.
But at the same time, you can clearly see that some of these “progressive” points were only added in as a write off.
And thinking about it from a late sixties perspective, many women did see more revealing clothes as an empowering choice to make. Men wanted women covered and modest, understated makeup, only exposed or done up for male enjoyment. Some women took that in the opposite direction and chose to wear more extravagant makeup, revealing clothing, and brighter colors.
I think it's worth emphasizing that this very genuinely is the main reason for the "sexist" miniskirts. IRL, women were often not choosing between sexy miniskirts and non-objectifying pants, but long skirts (respectable) and short skirts (rebellious). Deliberately wearing short skirts as rebellion against patriarchal control that mandated long skirts or maaaaybe loose slacks on a good day is still hardly unknown among girls/women leaving conservative communities in the USA, and was only more commonly coded that way at the time.
Sally Kellerman, the actress for Elizabeth Dehner, found the close fit of the supposedly more feminist pants uncomfortable and is often given something to hold in front of her because she was so intensely self-conscious about them. Grace Lee Whitney (Janice Rand) loathed the more "proper" initial look and worked with the (gay) costume designer, William Ware Theiss, to design a different, more daring and cool-looking aesthetic for women of the future that appealed to her personally. That was what resulted in the miniskirt uniform design. No doubt it served the objectifying tastes of various straight men involved, but literally zero of them were responsible for the design of Whitney's and Nichols's uniforms.
Not only did Nichelle Nichols not consider herself suffering from the miniskirt, she admitted later to sometimes deliberately lifting the skirt even higher at Uhura's station to show off more of her legs because she hadn't worked so hard on her body to not show them off. Meanwhile, Jill Ireland, the actress for Leila Kalomi, was nervous that she might have to wear the kinds of revealing costumes so many other TOS actresses did, and Theiss instead designed her the comfortable overalls she wears as Leila in "This Side of Paradise."
The kneejerk backlash against short skirts (in decidedly more reactionary eras of both Star Trek and US culture) led to both the large-scale disappearance of the skirts and the snide commentary on them throughout later iterations of Trek, with zero consideration of the fact that they were designed by a gay man to suit the preferences of the leading actresses at a time when they commonly represented rebellion. The Berman-era Star Trek productions tut-tutting at the old costumes while actually putting actresses in uncomfortable, form-fitting uniforms they disliked is ... uh, something else.
Even while the female Starfleet costumes shifted towards pants (and militarism) in the movies, btw, Nichelle Nichols insisted on getting to wear skirts as Uhura—because she liked them and she had little patience for 80s respectability.
soooo how long until they officially announce mitch mcconnell's death
sources for those who asked and those who haven't but should be in the habit of checking sources!
From the New York Times
Another story, this time from AP News
and also some screenshots of laura loomers tweets (accessed through xcancel). important to note that loomer is a far right conspiracy theorist and is NOT generally a good source; however, she does have connections with the trump administration and likely does have access to inside information (though that does not mean that this particular information is correct)