
Origami Around
Sade Olutola
todays bird

PR's Tumblrdome

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Janaina Medeiros
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
sheepfilms
occasionally subtle

roma★

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Misplaced Lens Cap
YOU ARE THE REASON
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

#extradirty
KIROKAZE
seen from United States

seen from Hungary

seen from United States
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@skeptic-gray

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Good idea. A phat bong rip at 2 AM will calm the nerves and get you right to sleep. Smart idea. #lifehacks
This is the money courage, reblog at your leisure for wealth, positivity and good fortune. Add any negativity to this post and a man will appear outside your home yelling “return the slab” over and over.
this might be a hard pill to swallow for college students but getting drunk all the time isnt a personality trait it’s alcoholism
Here’s another pill: companies and ad teams know that your 20s are extremely stressful and they purposely target you because they don’t care about making us all alcoholics as much as they care about profiting off of us.
cooler pill that I’d wish I’d known about when I was younger: if you’re struggling with alcohol, AA isn’t your only option. AA can be a bit dogmatic and sometimes hostile to certain communities, especially the LGBT.
there’s a group called SMART Recovery that has free meetings just like AA, but it’s all science-based and secular.
and here’s the thing for college students: unlike with AA, it’s okay if your goal is moderation and not abstinence. no one is going to make you feel like a bad guy for being young and just wanting help getting healthier, but perhaps not wanting to commit to being totally abstinent. google SMART Recovery, guys. they’re awesome. :)
Reblog for non-religious version of AA
Just be careful to avoid these groups. The Church of Scientology loves to use substance abuse support groups as a front.
I didn’t know AA was religious. Still, I might add: if AA is your only option in whatever region you’re in or for whatever other reason, you could still ask the meeting organizer before joining. A lot of religious people and institutions seem to be getting more on board with the LGBT community and are more welcoming to LGBT people, especially if they live in a place that’s culturally on board with LGBT right, people, culture, etc. (Like, a Muslim in California will probably be a lot cooler with a gay person than a Muslim in Saudi Arabia.). There’s a church in my town that invites LGBT individuals in and flies rainbow flags to make it clear where they stand. I work for a company that’s had scandals regarding the treatment of LGBT people in the past (hey, I just work there in a very insignificant position in a local chapter that has no influence on how the bigger picture is run because I need a job to make money. As soon as I can bounce I will.), but the people at the local level are chill. At my orientation into the new job, my boss was explaining a concept to me and said “so say if your girlfriend, or boyfriend…”, telling me outright he was chill with LGBT people and open about it, not doing some rainbow flag on his desk to subtly cue us gays in that he’s an ally kind of crap. I actually really appreciated it. Tl;dr: People are individuals and you won’t know if they won’t like you until you find out. If you have to use AA, you might want to check if the meeting organizer is cool with gay people and that you have nothing to worry about.
Whilst not specific to lgbt people I have some experience of atheist family members trying to use AA and like… it’s not really great if you dont believe in god. It’s not just vaguely founded on religion, it’s like all about using faith in god to help your recovery and not a lot else. It might be better than nothing if your an atheist (possibly even religious but not Christian I’m not sure how specific it gets) but honestly it is mostly about religion.
Fair enough. I’m not familiar with them, so additional information is welcome. If they are that religious, then yeah I would advise people to look for an alternative if that doesn’t suit them.
this might be a hard pill to swallow for college students but getting drunk all the time isnt a personality trait it’s alcoholism
Here’s another pill: companies and ad teams know that your 20s are extremely stressful and they purposely target you because they don’t care about making us all alcoholics as much as they care about profiting off of us.
cooler pill that I’d wish I’d known about when I was younger: if you’re struggling with alcohol, AA isn’t your only option. AA can be a bit dogmatic and sometimes hostile to certain communities, especially the LGBT.
there’s a group called SMART Recovery that has free meetings just like AA, but it’s all science-based and secular.
and here’s the thing for college students: unlike with AA, it’s okay if your goal is moderation and not abstinence. no one is going to make you feel like a bad guy for being young and just wanting help getting healthier, but perhaps not wanting to commit to being totally abstinent. google SMART Recovery, guys. they’re awesome. :)
Reblog for non-religious version of AA
Just be careful to avoid these groups. The Church of Scientology loves to use substance abuse support groups as a front.
I didn’t know AA was religious. Still, I might add: if AA is your only option in whatever region you’re in or for whatever other reason, you could still ask the meeting organizer before joining. A lot of religious people and institutions seem to be getting more on board with the LGBT community and are more welcoming to LGBT people, especially if they live in a place that’s culturally on board with LGBT right, people, culture, etc. (Like, a Muslim in California will probably be a lot cooler with a gay person than a Muslim in Saudi Arabia.). There’s a church in my town that invites LGBT individuals in and flies rainbow flags to make it clear where they stand. I work for a company that’s had scandals regarding the treatment of LGBT people in the past (hey, I just work there in a very insignificant position in a local chapter that has no influence on how the bigger picture is run because I need a job to make money. As soon as I can bounce I will.), but the people at the local level are chill. At my orientation into the new job, my boss was explaining a concept to me and said “so say if your girlfriend, or boyfriend...”, telling me outright he was chill with LGBT people and open about it, not doing some rainbow flag on his desk to subtly cue us gays in that he’s an ally kind of crap. I actually really appreciated it. Tl;dr: People are individuals and you won’t know if they won’t like you until you find out. If you have to use AA, you might want to check if the meeting organizer is cool with gay people and that you have nothing to worry about.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Listening to cr1tical talk about how awesome Beyond Meat is and how he doesn’t eat read meat anymore is just so hilarious.
Goddamn, living in LA just rots your brain, huh.
Why do you hate on people’s choice of estrogen intake method, arent you supposed to be promoting it?
I may be a tranny, but I’m not completely insane, I wouldn’t wish this life on my worst enemy.
What’s wrong with not eating red meat?
I mean, I do, but what’s wrong with not doing it?
Because there’s nothing wrong with eating red meat
And in some regions it’s a lot more sustainable to raise cows than chickens
It’s this trendy “eco-aware” bullshit, it has little to no actual scientific backing
He doesn’t do it because he’s done research and wants to impact the planet
He does it because he’s Californian and it’s peer pressure
Hot take: Beyond Meat isn’t bad. It’s fine. I had one before it was even a thing when it showed up at a burger joint near me that makes good sandwiches. I’m not veggie burger or eco burger adverse inherently, so I figured trying it once wouldn’t hurt. It’s fine. It tastes good imo. but, and this is the big but, it doesn’t taste just like beef. It is different. I could see myself having it again if I were in the mood, but I would be choosing between two different sandwiches the same way I could choose a burger or chicken sandwich, I’d be choosing a meat or beyond burger. Honestly, I think somebody could totally give up meat burgers for them, and that’s their prerogative to do so, but I won’t, and that’s also fine. And honestly jeez, not everything is a leftist plot either. You could technically take my pseudo review above as a glowing go ahead to forego meat burgers, and I’m not influenced by the soyboy cuck hivemind so far as I know. I honestly couldn’t give a shit if more people ate beyond burgers or not. If it helps people sleep at night or they genuinely like it more than beef burgers, that’s okay. I sleep. Wake me up when they give people cancer or tie their stomachs into knots and bore holes through the lining or make men’s testicles explode, then I’ll gladly call out some bullshit if dumbos are still promoting it.
GOD, yes, MAKE a game with a “murder is bad” message! By all means! But give me a pacifist run option! Make it hard as balls, but don’t FORCE me to become a murderer and then somehow make this my fault!
“If you don’t want to use white phosphorous on civilians, the only option is to completely stop playing the game you payed 30 bucks for.“
Yeah that was dumb. But to be fair tho in spec ops there was supposed to be a sense that the character was not 100% in control by the player and started doing stuff that the player wouldn’t necessarily want. It’s not saying you the player are bad but the intervention is bad.
The devs literally said the moral option was to stop playing at that point.
What about messages like “murder is inevitable” or “murder is good, actually”?
Honestly, that could be an interesting narrative, but someone attempting it would have to do it tastefully lest they botch the message and piss a lot of people off. Maybe have a game where there’s a villain who’s a real smashing bastard, but you don’t have to kill him, you’re given the possibility, the idea. the motivation, the incentive, etc., to not kill based on some moral high ground, a Batman V. Joker type of thing, if you will. You can get to the end and navigate the final encounter without killing, but maybe the end scene shows you that many more people were hurt or killed or enslaved or something as a direct result of you not killing, maybe you thought you dealt with him by throwing him in jail or something but he escapes and finds some other place to be a horrible dick to. In the end you realize the good option might’ve been to get over any perceived moral high ground and shoot the bastard dead. Death is inevitable and honesty there are some small amount of people who would be better off dead, even if it’s not always nice to say as much. Only problem I see is how you’d send this message narratively without giving the player a message of “You should kill objectively bad people”. I believe most people would be smart enough not to take that away from such a story, but it would only take 1 extremist of any political belief or orientation to take that kind ofmessage away to do some real harm in reality.
Anyone who points out the orange lady has two right feet will be bANNED. she lost her foot in an accident and got a foot transplant from her twin sister who sadly passed away of an unrelated illness at the same time (please don't ask, it's too emotional to discuss). Thank you for your time
@warmcoals
why did adam ellis get marked nsfw lmao
Pissbabies got assmad that he drew sonic banging a Pikachu and mass reported him.
How to Questions about Defunding Police:
“If we don’t have police, how do we stop crimes?”
A lack of police does not mean that crime runs rampant. A majority of police duties are actually surrounding things that we would not consider worthy of jail time such as homelessness. For actual crimes, law enforcement is still something that exists in a world with defunded police. It means that law enforcement is no longer responsible for all of public safety. The “police” would instead consist of a variety of teams including our classic conception of police, but primarily including other types of response teams such as mental health workers.
“What is a social worker going to do in a robbery?”
Once again, it’s about responding appropriately. The robbery wouldn’t happen in the first place, because a friend or family member of the future robber would notice that the individual is severely down on their luck or acting in ways that would indicate a robbery (such as leaving late at night), and would be able to call a social worker. The social worker would connect the individual with services that would now have the funding to provide the things the individual needed.
“What will police do without equipment?”
The truth is, officers never needed to be this heavily armed. Most police stations are so heavily militarized that citizens can expect a military-type force at situations that only require a small intervention. If a situation literally requires the strength of the military behind it, it’s clearly not a local law enforcement situation.
“Politicians would never vote for that!”
But citizens would. Clearly there are people who firmly believe in this idea, and it’s inevitable that some of them will run for office. Vote for them.
“White people get killed by cops too.”
The fact that you only bring this up in the context of people of color getting killed by police is telling.
We’ll see. If this goes well it goes well if not well sucks to be you
Once again, it’s about responding appropriately. The robbery wouldn’t happen in the first place, because a friend or family member of the future robber would notice that the individual is severely down on their luck or acting in ways that would indicate a robbery (such as leaving late at night), and would be able to call a social worker. The social worker would connect the individual with services that would now have the funding to provide the things the individual needed.
Yeah, that’s pretty dumb. methods of law enforcement have existed before police, and I’m interested and hopeful this goes well for Minneapolis, and hell I do think the police institution is rotten to the core and I’m open to see a new way work, but we’ll still need some sort of plan for when somebody does do a bad thing. It’ll be awesome if we cut down on the amount of people who want to do a crime, but people who get driven to do a crime anyway isn’t a failure of a system inherently, nor is needing a plan when somebody commits a crime a failure of law enforcement. It sounds like Minneapolis already has plans for their law enforcement without police, but Rome isn’t built in a day and I hope they can handle a situation well when they have to deal with the first robber or shooter they can’t save.
I need for everyone here in these notes to understand that I did not write this to appeal as a fucking plan. I wrote this to explain the philosophy behind defunding the police. I had a line in there about how yknow, if you have a shooter, you respond with officers in the current way we think of them. But I didn’t think it was necessary, because I thought it was inherent. I thought the way I phrased it was clear. It means limiting the number of police we have as we know it. Limiting them far more. It was meant to go along with other information I have seen for people who believe in defunding the police and aren’t sure how to explain the philosophy. It wasn’t meant to solve crime.
It’s also important to note that I did say a majority of crimes are due to a failure of system. Because the reality is that crime rates are much higher in areas where the system does not work.
also @skeptic-gray I hope you understand that this response is not directly to your post, but I have a lot of people in my notes and I can’t respond to everyone. I just decided to respond to the person with the most sense.
You know what, fair enough. As I said myself, I’m not inherently against the idea, and you’re right there’s a lot of misinformation, and thus people trying to explain what defund the police actually means. I guess I did respond to somebody focusing on one part to discredit the whole, but then as you said I tried to respond it turn with a concern, but with a nuanced, realistic take on the idea. I think the one part there did come off a little wishful thinking-esque, but that’s since since as you said you were basically just describing an idea, and I already encourage pople describing an idea they believe it to have high hopes for it.
How to Questions about Defunding Police:
“If we don’t have police, how do we stop crimes?”
A lack of police does not mean that crime runs rampant. A majority of police duties are actually surrounding things that we would not consider worthy of jail time such as homelessness. For actual crimes, law enforcement is still something that exists in a world with defunded police. It means that law enforcement is no longer responsible for all of public safety. The “police” would instead consist of a variety of teams including our classic conception of police, but primarily including other types of response teams such as mental health workers.
“What is a social worker going to do in a robbery?”
Once again, it’s about responding appropriately. The robbery wouldn’t happen in the first place, because a friend or family member of the future robber would notice that the individual is severely down on their luck or acting in ways that would indicate a robbery (such as leaving late at night), and would be able to call a social worker. The social worker would connect the individual with services that would now have the funding to provide the things the individual needed.
“What will police do without equipment?”
The truth is, officers never needed to be this heavily armed. Most police stations are so heavily militarized that citizens can expect a military-type force at situations that only require a small intervention. If a situation literally requires the strength of the military behind it, it’s clearly not a local law enforcement situation.
“Politicians would never vote for that!”
But citizens would. Clearly there are people who firmly believe in this idea, and it’s inevitable that some of them will run for office. Vote for them.
“White people get killed by cops too.”
The fact that you only bring this up in the context of people of color getting killed by police is telling.
We’ll see. If this goes well it goes well if not well sucks to be you
Once again, it’s about responding appropriately. The robbery wouldn’t happen in the first place, because a friend or family member of the future robber would notice that the individual is severely down on their luck or acting in ways that would indicate a robbery (such as leaving late at night), and would be able to call a social worker. The social worker would connect the individual with services that would now have the funding to provide the things the individual needed.
Yeah, that’s pretty dumb. methods of law enforcement have existed before police, and I’m interested and hopeful this goes well for Minneapolis, and hell I do think the police institution is rotten to the core and I’m open to see a new way work, but we’ll still need some sort of plan for when somebody does do a bad thing. It’ll be awesome if we cut down on the amount of people who want to do a crime, but people who get driven to do a crime anyway isn’t a failure of a system inherently, nor is needing a plan when somebody commits a crime a failure of law enforcement. It sounds like Minneapolis already has plans for their law enforcement without police, but Rome isn’t built in a day and I hope they can handle a situation well when they have to deal with the first robber or shooter they can’t save.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
holy shit
finally someone let me outta my bag
N O W
holy shit
original thread by @pukicho and several other users
I always love seeing this comic because it interprets Tumblr as a gigantic theater ruled by absolute chaos where sometimes somebody just stands up on their chair and shouts and we all pay attention
if anyone want to indulge in some more internet nostalgia, there’s a preservation project called bluemaxima’s flashpoint which has archived thousands of old flash/shockwave games and made it possible to install them from a single launcher (which will still work after flash is discontinued)
here’s a trailer explaining the project
and here’s a link to the official website
It might seem weird, at first, to think of this as an endeavor of cultural preservation, but that is exactly what it is.
I liked Doooors.
My childhood is in there. And I def remember that Cartoon Network resort thing.
Holy fuck I remember that shitty Cartoon Network website game in the picture.
i really hope that no protesters/rioters know that grabbing the bottom of a police officers riot shield and flipping it up will push the officer on his back, rendering him immobile due to the weight of his riot gear :(( that would be an awful thing to know and terrible information to spread :((((
on another note, i really hope protesters/rioters don’t find out that you can buy plywood from home depot from 9-30$ and make your signs out of that, and use it to deflect and shield yourself from rubber bullets :((( noooo don’t do that :(((
yknow I really hope it doesn't catch on that paintballs and paint balloons can impair vision through face shields and make equipment slick :( it'd really be soo bad :(((
I hope all of you guys realize that there are usually 20 other officers around that will shoot your stupid ass for attempting something like this.
To be fair, you know a protest doesnt consist of 1 person, right? But hundreds, if not thousands?
None of whom seem to carry a gun.
I was at a BLM protest today. We played music, danced, ate food, and had fun. The organizers of the event made calls over a loud mic whenever there was even a suggestion that someone might be trying to start some violence. The organizers at the event I was at would hate these guys.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm slowly starting to understand how to play this nonsense
Ayo, you got a Switch and Smash?
Spread this like wild fire to hell and back. This is infuriating. If you’re in America and you didn’t care about the protests before, ask yourself where you’ll be if this becomes your neighborhood.