Untitled

From the Empress

Poor Poh Ling Yeow is now a member of the Sussex Survivors Club. You know what is being reported is the softened version of events and that her behavior was actually even worse. Fuck her and fuck everyone who keeps giving these two assholes chance after chance to go around acting like a couple of twats all the time. Someone needs to tell them to just go the fuck away already and take all of their misery and chaos with them.

Well it only happens ONCE just once is more than enough of them dealing with her and her bullshit.

She had no objection to them making a meal fit for a Duchess.

PS: The same thing happened with the funding for the Canadian IG. Charles met with Trudeau and the very next day Trudeau pledged close to $30 million for IG.

He knows he has only one chance while Charles is still King.

I really want to know if William is ready for the cluster-F which will follow.

Can I say something really controversial? Especially coming from a William stan like me? I am this close to losing my patience with William. There is too much at stake for him to allow his father to destroy the monarchy while he sits on the sidelines. This problem is bigger than Charles and Harry at this point and ignoring it not going to make it go away.

Yes I realize how absurd I sound, given that William has zero authority to do anything. But maybe he needs to play dirty too, maybe he should break this dam of silence, starting with the surrogacy and bullying cover up.

The billion dollar question is, why has Charles conspired with the Sussexes in a lie of this magnitude?

Hi Nonny,

Hi Celta, I just wanted to give you an idea of just how truly insane the PR has been from Harry in the few days before his ruling on Tuesday. Chris Ship tweeted that “BREAKING: As we reported earlier this week, Harry is serious that the threats against him in the UK are so credible that he will not travel to London with Meghan and their children, Archie and Lilibet. They might however join him for UK events outside of London” (e.g. Birmingham). Closer Magazine reported that Prince Harry “believes he should be treated the way the Prince and Princess of Wales are when they travel overseas” and “wants the full royal treatment because, in his mind, he’s still a prince.” And then the Daily Mail had this headline: “Truth behind Harry and Meghan’s return to Britain: Why he sensationally could go back to being a ‘working royal’, role of their children and the secret Europe holiday with a wealthy friend…” That’s just a sampling of all the crazy headlines in addition to Harry’s self-paid private security report that was leaked to ITV. I think Harry was throwing the nuclear mother-of-all tantrums to try to get his security reinstated after it was publicized a week ago that RAVEC denied him 24/7 security and that the arrangement since Megxit (a.k.a. case-by-case basis) would remain in place.  Harry was never told NO growing up and I do fault both of his parents for spoiling him rotten instead of holding him to account as a child. Because you only had to look at the video of Harry giving his 6 minute speech at the Invictus Games committee to see how chastened he was after he had to concede he wasn’t going to get his security reinstated and that the ruling by Judge Nicklin declared that Harry’s legal team lost their case.  Neil Sean has continued to hear that Harry is considering appealing again for his security to be reinstated. I have no doubt his legal team that just lost the class action media lawsuit against the Daily Mail will also try to appeal in order to not pay over £50 million pounds to the Daily Mail. It’s been a wild ride this past week in Royal Watching, lol!

*

Hi TeaWithBooks,

It definitely was a wild ride, and Harry had all his entitled brattishness and emotional blackmail on full display.

I agree that Harry was throwing a tantrum to try and get the security he wanted for himself, which progressed to another tantrum over his court case loss (as per the statement he put out), and then emotional blackmail that he was having a ‘breakdown’ to get the one thing he has been after for ages - a meeting with his father.

Here’s Shauna from Vintage Reads last night Aussie time. She’s well researched and names her sources. At the 28:10 mark Meghan has started briefing against the palace through her online sources Penske Media and Stylecaster. She’s complaining it has been reported that she’s blackmailing the King and he’s blocked her from taking photos with him. I assume of the king with the invisikids. Mainstream has totally missed it thus far. Shauna is of the opinion now that based on what she can verify only Harry saw the Charles. When you play with pigs you’re gonna get mud soaked. It’s interesting that Mad World has always seen in her cards Meghan finessing something with Charles and the invisikids. She may even right now still be working on it, hence her unusual silence through the usual sources. Isn’t it refreshing how quiet it is when the PR guns are silent? Dont get used to it though.

https://www.youtube.com/live/bVmM5Z5b0KU?si=D4FlIygb3Exu0EUE

Hi AnonymousRetired,

Thank you for this. I've heard a lot of good things about Shauna and her you tube channel. I haven't heard about Meghan being accused of blackmailing The King, but I have heard that some of the conditions of the meeting were no phones (they had to surrender them before they went in) and no photos/photographer with the Harkles. The only photos were by a palace-approved photographer and they belong to the palace, not to the Harkles. Meghan's complaints support those rumours, as does the absence of any photos on her social media or 'leaked' to the press.

I can't think of a reason why The King would put out an official statement saying he met with Harry, Meghan and the kids if he only met with Harry. I'm not saying that it is not possible, just that I can't think of a reason for The King to lie about it in an official palace statement.

I am enjoying the PR silence, as brief as it may be.

Link in ask:

First time I've asked and ask, but have you seen this?

Regarding all this, I lean towards Neil Sean’s version of that meeting (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5owXkKP3mXk) because Kinsey Schofield and Tom Bower have partially confirmed it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIJDVqQ9HU0&t=111s), and other reporters have also been confirming parts of it.

King Charles III had no intention of meeting with Harry. He didn’t want to do it, but then Harry broke down—due to the court ruling, the “pill” story, and because, as Tom Bower puts it, his reputation was ruined. Bower calls it “suicide,” and I agree. So, the King agreed to see Harry.

Harry showed up with TW and the children, hoping to launch a “grand family reunion” narrative… but it is now coming to light that this wasn’t the case. It lasted no more than an hour; the King had an engagement that morning and arrived at Highgrove around 3:30 or 4:00 PM—roughly the same time Harry arrived—and by 5:00 or 6:00 PM, it was all over. Why? Because the Harkles were staying at Althorp—where Harry was seen leaving on Saturday—and the drive between Highgrove and Althorp takes two hours. So, it was essentially a tea-time meeting that took place because the King was concerned after several people saw Harry breaking down.

Why Highgrove? Because, as Sean recounted, KC3 has a small staff, and they are extremely loyal. If anything leaks—even the slightest detail—it will be immediately obvious where it came from. Harry and TW will try to sell a story, but the facts are that Harry lied the whole time, never actually needed the security, and was just throwing a tantrum; and no matter how hard Harry or TW try, nothing is going to save them now.

Even Bower says the situation is worse than what he wrote in *Revenge* and *Betrayal*. Man, I’ve had such a fun week with all this! 🤭🤭🤭

———————–