I think my favorite things in math are all the strange and unusual Spaces. I just want to study weird spaces.
trying on a metaphor
Show & Tell
AnasAbdin
YOU ARE THE REASON
One Nice Bug Per Day

pixel skylines
Jules of Nature

PR's Tumblrdome
Game of Thrones Daily

★
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Discoholic 🪩
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Keni
Three Goblin Art
Monterey Bay Aquarium
taylor price
sheepfilms
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from Germany

seen from India

seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Finland

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
@sevenfactorial
I think my favorite things in math are all the strange and unusual Spaces. I just want to study weird spaces.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
It'll all be okay. You'll be okay. You just have to do more math. Do more math and everything will turn out alright. You'll see. You'll be alright. Chin up. There's math to do. You'll be fine.
trying to do some programming and keep finding myself typing \geq instead of >= . truly no one has it as hard as me
I bet that some IDEs allow you to set up autoreplacement of certain strings as you program. Like, on my phone, I made it so that "\R" gets automatically replaced by ℝ and ":shrug" becomes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I've never tired doing it on any IDEs (or laptop in general), but surely there must be some that make it possible.
Is this worth even looking into? No clue!
Today's number is Apéry's constant
Most famous constants announce themselves immediately. For example, π appears wherever circles show up, e emerges from growth and calculus, and so on. But there's a stranger hiding deep within this infinite series:
ζ(3) = 1 + 1 / 2^3 + 1 / 3^3 + 1 / 4^3 + . . .
The number this sum converges to is called Apéry's constant, and despite looking innocent, it resisted proof for centuries. Mathematicians strongly suspected that it was irrational but nobody could prove it until 1978.
The Zeta Function Apéry's constant comes from one of the most important objects in mathematics: the Riemann zeta function.
For real numbers s > 1,
ζ(s) = ∑_{n=1}^∞ 1 / n^s
(the infinite series of 1 / 1 ^ s + 1 / 2 ^ s + 1 / 3 ^ s + . . . )
At first glance, this is just an infinite sum. But the zeta function secretly connects prime numbers, complex analysis, quantum physics, probability, cryptography, and the distribution of the primes themselves.
Some values are beautifully understood. For example,
ζ(2) = π^2 / 6
ζ(4) = π^4 / 90
In fact, every even positive integer produces a formula involving powers of π. But the odd inputs are another story.
Nobody knows a comparably elegant formula for
ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), . . .
These numbers are mysterious, and ζ(3) became the first "battleground".
Roger Apéry's Bombshell
Numerically, Apéry's constant equals approximately
1.202056903159694...
The question sounds deceptively simple: Is this number rational? For over 200 years, nobody knew. That's remarkable because Euler had solved the analogous problem for ζ(2) in the 1700s.
In 1978, French Mathematician Roger Apéry announced that ζ(3) was irrational in a lecture. The announcement was met with criticism in part because Apéry was relatively unknown at the time. He also gave the lecture in French, made jokes throughout, and omitted several key explanations needed to follow the proof..
For example, there was an equation at the beginning of his lecture that no one knew but formed the core of his proof. When asked where this equation came from, Apéry is said to have answered "They grow in my garden," which was said to have caused many in the audience to stand up and leave the room.
However, someone in attendance had an electronic calculator (uncommon at the time) and with a short program, checked Apéry's equation and found it correct.
The equation in question is below, which was an unknown series representation of ζ(3) at the time:
With this expression, he was able to use a condition for irrationality that German mathematician Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet had derived in the 19th century. It states that a number χ is irrational if there are an infinite number of integers p and q, so that the following inequality is satisfied:
Here, c and δ denote constant values. Although the formula looks complicated, it basically means that χ can be approximated by fractions, but there is no fractional number that corresponds to χ exactly. Apéry succeeded in deriving this inequality for ζ(3), and thus the number is irrational.
In simpler terms, Apéry's proof constructed two sequences of integers:
a_n and b_n
such that
a_n / b_n
approximate ζ(3) far too well for a rational number.
This is the key philosophical idea. If a number is rational, there are limits to how accurately fractions can approximate it without eventually becoming exact. Apéry built approximations that violated those limits.
The machinery involved strange recursive sequences and combinatorial identities that seemed to come out of nowhere.
Even now, many mathematicians describe the proof as "magical".
To honor his work, the value of ζ(3) now bears his name and is known as Apéry's constant. This doesn't answer all of the questions associated with the number, however. We are still looking for a clear numerical value for ζ(3) that can be expressed with known constants, much in the same way ζ(2) is.
But regardless, Apéry's constant feels like an accident. It emerges from a simple series, has no known simple closed form, and required centuries to understand even partially. And yet it keeps appearing across math and physics like a recurring character in a story nobody fully understands.
Not every important mathematical object arrives polished and symmetrical. But that's part of what makes ζ(3) beautiful.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Max Bill's Gelbes Feld
Cover art for this article by Barry Cipra in this month's Notices. Gelbes Feld = Yellow Field, and the original Max Bill piece is a magic square.
The math in the article is about pipifying odd magic squares.
But then my eye was caught by something else: The way the 4 appears in the lower right-hand corner is not the way it’s typically represented by pips on a die or domino. The “normal” way to display a 4 is with dots in the four corners, not at the four midpoints. That artistic choice bothered me. Until a possible explanation jumped out: Bill had arranged things so that there are exactly 5 pips across each row, down each column, and along the two main diagonals of his array. I’ll use the term “pipification” to describe such a representation of numbers in an 𝑛 × 𝑛 magic square using pips in an 𝑛 × 𝑛 grid within each of the 𝑛2 cells in the square, arranged so that there are the same number of pips in each row, column, and diagonal; see Figure 3.
Count the pips!
Made me make this...
we're proud to present our collaboration with famous constant pi! presenting: 31415926535897932384626433832795028841.
And 31
shush that’s the paid add-on we haven’t released that yet please don’t leak it
And 3
STOP YOU MUST PAY ME FIRST
Sorry :[
Here! $314159 <- prime number
evil >:( you were probably sent by Euler, my arch rival, to destroy me. if only there was a way to know you two were affiliated…
Is he your arch rival because he summed your reciprocals? Or for his work on antiprimes?
I wish I was affiliated with Leonhard Euler, sadly I'm not :/
In Copenhagen you can visit The Round Tower. It used to be an astronomical observatory until light pollution and the vibrations from increased traffic in the streets made it useless for its original purpose.
Today it’s mostly famous for what it looks like on the inside.
It has an equestrian staircase though it’s so smooth it’s really just a gentle slope more than a staircase. It was build like that so our lazy bum king could ride his horse all the way to the top (king not in photo)
And naturally people have also driven cars up the tower
And held a bike race
For a while it was just sort of abandoned by the authorities and became a spiraling marketplace
But today it has been restored and become a tourist spot as well as a popular destination for school trips. And yes, you can still watch the cosmos at the top.
Link / Link
Recently, I was texting a friend to make plans for going to a pride festival. At some point, I opened up my email to find that I FINALLY got my summer work contract, which we use docusign for. Since this friend is working on the same project:

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Please recommend your fav youtube or other channels explaining cool maths, and books, it would help me so much. I got *extremely* smart kids but I am not gifted in maths myself so I hope to throw stuff at them and see what sticks. In the sense of, 6yo going to university to find calculus is too easy. At the moment fractiles, hilbert curves, and square stacking problems are interesting but in 2 weeks, who knows. Nothing is too tough :)
Hi! That sounds like a very exciting parenting challenge. I have a whole bunch of channels I follow, see if there's any here you'd enjoy :)
suckerpinch - Tom 7 is a certified Computer Science Guy, and on his YouTube channel he makes these lovely videos on his weird programming projects, supplemented with silly drawings.
Sheafification of g - This channel has rapidfire irreverent presentations of math subjects, usually about category theory and its applications to logic and functional programming. This is probably my favourite math channel on YouTube right now, and it's the most similar to my own style of writing posts.
Sebastian Lague - He's an indie game developer who in recent years has found his stride making extremely well-presented videos on his own small exploratory projects called "Coding Adventures", usually on one specific technique in gamedev or computer graphics.
3blue1brown - I think everyone knows this channel, but it nevers hurts to include. Beautifully animated videos on all sorts of math subjects.
Numberphile - Very well known. Relatively short videos of mathematicians as they explain math subjects, oftentimes number theory, by writing with black markers on big sheets of brown paper. I don't watch all their videos but many of them are very interesting.
The Gray Cuber - Short animated videos on a variety of math subjects, usually either group theory or funny things you can do with numbers. In the past year or so he's really leaned into a very silly presentational style which does make me chuckle, and he has a knack for finding interesting ideas to really play around with.
Joseph Newton - Very lovely explainers on what I think are really interesting math subjects. Plus I like his voice.
optozorax - In my opinion one of the most exciting programming/math/physics projects currently on YouTube. They're investigating ways of modelling portals (like from the video game Portal), and how to make sense of what happens when they move or accelerate, or when they affect gravity, or pass through one another. Really really cool original work, including interactive web demos.
Mathemaniac - Animated explainers on math and physics, aiming to leverage visuals to create new intuition. I'm especially excited about his current series on differential forms.
Zundamon's Theorem - Two text-to-speech characters talk about math subjects in a sort of Socratic dialogue. Usually the subjects are interesting ways of looking at or generalizing familiar concepts from school mathematics.
Michael Penn - Presentations on lots of different math subjects, though oftentime he's running through either a long calculation or a proof of a single statement. Usually number theory or calculus, and always just him in front of a chalkboard talking to the camera. And that's a good place to stop.
webgoatguy - Cute short videos, working through solving elementary (meaning 'not a lot of theory necessary') problems while scribbling in a drawing program.
jacobneu - Animated explainers in a nice style, about topics related to homotopy type theory.
2swap - Animated explainers! These ones have some really stunning visualizations that help solve the presented problems. Also they're really into Connect 4 so there's a bunch of videos on that.
PolyaMath - Guess what, it's more animated explainers. Mostly about solving certain interesting puzzles, often about geometry.
Dropped my fucking heart emoticon
∠2
oh my GOD i hope no one realizes i have multiple facets
oh thank god…
So let me get this straight. When you code you actually have to write code and understand coding to code??
no actually you just copy paste other’s code and hope it works
One of my long distance best friends (we talk like, constantly) apparently did not realize that I've actually had two officemates since Aug. Which. Okay kinda makes sense tbh.
One of them is a close friend and is often around for both academic and non-academic shenaniganary that I'll tell my long distance friends about.
Otoh, I am friendly with the other one, but he doesn't spend a lot of time in the office since he has young kids. So he's basically never in stories I tell my friends. (I have absolutely mentioned him before though. Without a doubt but nothing very substantial and this best friend is a bit forgetful. And quite adhd.)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
When I was in grade school I used to send emails to biologists and zoologists asking them questions to get answers to include in school projects I was working on, and would cry when they did not respond because I thought I was stupid for thinking that some random kid would ever be deserving of a response from someone who does something as smart and cool and important as *checks notes* studies frog fungus.
Now, at 29, I’m lowkey having a panic attack because my academic email is filled with middle schoolers wanting me to answer their questions about pygmy raccoons and I keep putting off answering them because I’m so overwhelmed with all the other raccoon stuff I have to do.
Anyway, greatest apologies to any scientist I ever emailed as a child and also an adult.
I know your research is really important and I appreciate all you are doing but this is so fucking funny
average first sentence of a math wikipedia page:
A snorkle basis is a particular sort of set that has some properties and is generally "nice" (in a rigorous sense) and can do many things and is very practical.