βWhen Michael Jackson died in 2009, Wade Robsonβthe former choreographer whose allegations of abuse are at the center of a controversial new documentary, Leaving Neverlandβwrote in tribute to his friend:
βMichael Jackson changed the world and, more personally, my life forever. He is the reason I dance, the reason I make music, and one of the main reasons I believe in the pure goodness of humankind. He has been a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragement and his unconditional love will live inside of me forever. I will miss him immeasurably, but I know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk.β
Robson was twenty-seven years old at the time. Four years earlier, he testified at Jacksonβs 2005 trial (as an adult) that nothing sexual ever happened between them. Prior to the trial Robson hadnβt seen Jackson for years and was under no obligation to be a witness for the defense. He faced a withering cross-examination, understanding the penalty of perjury for lying under oath. But Robson adamantly, confidently, and credibly asserted that nothing sexual ever happened.β
WHAT CHANGED BETWEEN THEN AND NOW ? A FEW THINGS :
β’ In 2011, Robson approached John Branca, co-executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, about directing the new Michael Jackson/Cirque du Soleil production, Immortal. Robson admitted he wanted the job βbadly,β but the Estate ultimately chose someone else for the position.
β’ In 2012, Robson had a nervous breakdown, triggered, he said, by an obsessive quest for success. His career, in his own words, began to βcrumble.β That same year, with Robsonβs career, finances, and marriage in peril, he began shopping a book that claimed he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson. No publisher picked it up.
β’ In 2013, Robson filed a $1.5 billion dollar civil lawsuit/creditorβs claim, along with James Safechuck, who also spent time with Jackson in the late β80s. Safechuck claimed he only realized he may have been abused when Robson filed his lawsuit. That lawsuit was dismissed by a probate court in 2017.
β’ In 2019, the Sundance Film Festival premiered a documentary based entirely on Robson and Safechuckβs allegations. While the documentary is obviously emotionally disturbing given the content, it presents no new evidence or witnesses. The filmβs director, Dan Reed, acknowledged not wanting to interview other key figures because it might complicate or compromise the story he wanted to tell.
It is tempting for the media to tie Jackson into a larger cultural narrative about sexual misconduct. R. Kelly was rightfully taken down by a documentary, and many other high-profile figures have been exposed in recent years, so surely, the logic goes, Michael Jackson must be guilty as well. Yet that is a dangerous leapβparticularly with Americaβs history of unjustly targeting and convicting black menβthat fair-minded people would be wise to consider more carefully before condemning the artist. It is no accident that one of Jacksonβs favorite books (and movies) was To Kill a Mockingbird, a story about a black manβTom Robinsonβdestroyed by false allegations.
The mediaβs largely uncritical, de-contextualized takes out of Sundance seem to have forgotten: no allegations have been more publicly scrutinized than those against Michael Jackson. They elicited a two-year feeding frenzy in the mid-90s and then again in the mid-2000s, when Jackson faced an exhaustive criminal trial. His homes were ransacked in two unannounced raids by law enforcement. Nothing incriminating was found. Jackson was acquitted of all charges in 2005 by a conservative Santa Maria jury. The FBI, likewise, conducted a thorough investigation. Its 300-page file on the pop star, released under the Freedom of Information Act, found no evidence of wrongdoing.
Meanwhile, dozens of individuals who spent time with Jackson as kids continue to assert nothing sexual ever happened. This includes hundreds of sick and terminally ill children such as Bela Farkas (for whom Jackson paid for a life-saving liver transplant) and Ryan White (whom Jackson befriended and supported in his final years battling AIDS); it includes lesser-known figures like Brett Barnes and Frank Cascio; it includes celebrities like Macaulay Culkin, Sean Lennon, Emmanuel Lewis, Alfonso Ribeiro, and Corey Feldman; it includes Jacksonβs nieces and nephews; and it includes his own three children.
The allegations surrounding Jackson largely faded over the past decade for a reason: unlike the Bill Cosby or R. Kelly cases, the more people looked into the Jackson allegations, the more the evidence vindicated him. The prosecutionβs case in 2005 was so absurd Rolling Stoneβs Matt Taibbi described it like this:
β Ostensibly a story about bringing a child molester to justice, the Michael Jackson trial would instead be a kind of homecoming parade of insipid American types: grifters, suckers and no-talent schemers, mired in either outright unemploymentβ¦ or the bogus non-careers of the information age, looking to cash in any way they can. The MC of the proceedings was District Attorney Tom Sneddon, whose metaphorical role in this American reality show was to represent the mean gray heart of the Nixonian Silent Majority β the bitter mediocrity itching to stick it to anyone whoβd ever taken a vacation to Paris. The first month or so of the trial featured perhaps the most compromised collection of prosecution witnesses ever assembled in an American criminal case β almost to a man a group of convicted liars, paid gossip hawkers or worseβ¦β
In the next six weeks, virtually every piece of his case imploded in open court, and the chief drama of the trial quickly turned into a race to see if the DA could manage to put all of his witnesses on the stand without getting any of them removed from the courthouse in manacles.
β’β’β’ WHATβS CHANGED SINCE THEN ? β’β’β’
In Robsonβs case, decades after the alleged incidents took place, he was barbecuing with Michael Jackson and his children. He was asking for tickets to the artistβs memorial. He was participating in tributes. βI still have my mobile phone with his number in it,β Robson wrote in 2009, βI just canβt bare the thought of deleting his messages.β
Then, suddenly, after twenty years, his story changed and with his new claims came a $1.5 billion dollar lawsuit.
As an eccentric, wealthy, African American man, Michael Jackson has always been a target for litigation. During the 1980s and 1990s, dozens of women falsely claimed he was the father of their children. He faced multiple lawsuits falsely claiming he plagiarized various songs. As recently as 2010, a woman named Billie Jean filed a frivolous $600 million paternity lawsuit against Jacksonβs Estate.
As someone who has done an enormous amount of research on the artist, interviewed many people who were close to him, and been granted access to a lot of private information, my assessment is that the evidence simply does not point to Michael Jackson as the βmonsterβ presented in Leaving Neverland. In contrast to Robson and Safechuckβs revised accounts, there is a remarkable consistency to the way people who knew the artist speak of himβwhether friends, family members, collaborators, fellow artists,recording engineers, attorneys, business associates, security guards, former spouses, his own childrenβpeople who knew him in every capacity imaginable. Michael, they say, was gentle, brilliant, sensitive, sometimes naive, sometimes childish, sometimes oblivious to perceptions. But none believe he was a child molester.
A fair documentary would allow those voices to be heard as well. Instead, Leaving Neverland presents a biased, emotionally manipulative hit piece that dismisses the perspectives of hundreds of first-hand witnesses in favor of allegations by two men contradicting their own sworn testimonies.
vaporwave
gracieabrams
prguitarman
andulkaphoto
