Doodly Doo Doo

The Tiger Poem in Classical Maya!

The Tiger He has destroyed his cage Yes Yes The tiger is out By Nael, Age 6

Literal translation:

he-destroyed his-captive-place the-jaguar yes-yes he-came.out the-jaguar his-writing master-Na'el man[of]-6-years

Transliteration:

ʔu-jomow ʔu-baaknal ʔu-balahm xt xt Joyoy ʔu-balahm ʔu-tz'ibaal Aj-Naʔel Aj-6-habiy

Character Transliteration (ALL CAPS are characters that stand for full words, lower case are syllabic):

ʔu-jo-mo-wa ʔu-ba-ki-NAL ʔu-BALAM-la-ma xa-ta-xa-ta jo-JOY-yi ʔu-BALAM-ma ʔu-tz'i-ba-li AJ-na-ʔe-le AJ-6-HAB-bi-ya

[Image shows the poem written in 2 columns of Maya glyph blocks. A diagram shows the reading order (which is complex). All the posts text is also included on the image.

The writing style for the poem is based of the Fancy carved versions used for royal monuments. Kinda equivalent to extra-formal calligraphy. There ARE simpler ways to write!

This vase shows simplified forms of the ‘ʔu’, ‘bi’, ‘jo’, ‘wa’, and ‘ya’ characters from the poem.

The labels/names on this mural are very simplified - I can only recognize ‘ma’ from the poem.

This final vase has ‘ʔu’, ‘la’, ‘ʔAJ’, ‘ma’, and probably ‘ya’, from the poem.

This codex (book) is from quite a bit later than the other examples. It’s even MORE simplified, but I’m not sure how much is a more casual style, and how much is characters changing form over time. ‘Ma’, 'yi’ and 'wa’ are the only characters I can immediately recognize from the poem.

I’ve also seen an example of someone doing math on a cave wall that’s really simplified and sketchy, but I couldn’t find the image.

-

>First, we’ve discovered that about a quarter of all the internet connection in or out of the house were ad related. In a few hours, that’s about 10,000 out of 40,000 processed.

>We also discovered that every link on Twitter was blocked. This was solved by whitelisting the https://t.co domain.

>Once out browsing the Web, everything is loading pretty much instantly. It turns out most of that Page Loading malarkey we’ve been accustomed to is related to sites running auctions to sell Ad space to show you before the page loads. All gone now.

>We then found that the Samsung TV (which I really like) is very fond of yapping all about itself to Samsung HQ. All stopped now. No sign of any breakages in its function, so I’m happy enough with that.

>The primary source of distress came from the habitual Lemmings player in the house, who found they could no longer watch ads to build up their in-app gold. A workaround is being considered for this.

>The next ambition is to advance the Ad blocking so that it seamlessly removed YouTube Ads. This is the subject of ongoing research, and tinkering continues. All in all, a very successful experiment.

>Certainly this exceeds my equivalent childhood project of disassembling and assembling our rotary dial telephone. A project whose only utility was finding out how to make the phone ring when nobody was calling.

>Update: All4 on the telly appears not to have any ads any more. Goodbye Arnold Clarke!

>Lemmings problem now solved.

>Can confirm, after small tests, that RTÉ Player ads are now gone and the player on the phone is now just delivering swift, ad free streams at first click.

>Some queries along the lines of “Are you not stealing the internet?” Firstly, this is my network, so I may set it up as I please (or, you know, my son can do it and I can give him a stupid thumbs up in response). But there is a wider question, based on the ads=internet model.

>I’m afraid I passed the You Wouldn’t Download A Car point back when I first installed ad-blocking plug-ins on a browser. But consider my chatty TV. Individual consumer choice is not the method of addressing pervasive commercial surveillance.

>Should I feel morally obliged not to mute the TV when the ads come on? No, this is a standing tension- a clash of interests. But I think my interest in my family not being under intrusive or covert surveillance at home is superior to the ad company’s wish to profile them.

>Aside: 24 hours of Pi Hole stats suggests that Samsung TVs are very chatty. 14,170 chats a day.

>YouTube blocking seems difficult, as the ads usually come from the same domain as the videos. Haven’t tried it, but all of the content can also be delivered from a no-cookies version of the YouTube domain, which doesn’t have the ads. I have asked my son to poke at that idea.

Because they put on a story about a sympathetic character with deep emotions who is desperate to find hope, her brother the funny character, and a light-hearted prankster whose stated goal was to bring laughter and harmony to all, and then had them killed at the end by a representation of their leader who was absolutely posed and acted as if he were a villain. And because Ozai wins, nobody can point to the play and say “That’s subversion!”

The people who love Ozai and think he can do no wrong will see a story where Ozai wins. The people who actually understand how drama works will realize that this is a tragedy where the villain wins.

(They did turn Zuko into a buffoon, and they played Azula pretty straight, so it’s not as if they wholly despise their royalty or think Zuko’s a great guy for changing sides… but Ozai is absolutely presented in that story as if he’s a villain, except that in the Fire Nation of course “Ozai wins” is required.)

Like… I’ve read propaganda. In stories which serve as propaganda, they don’t make the entire story be about the “villains” except for approximately two minutes at the end when the “hero” appears, they don’t make the “villains” at all sympathetic, and they spend a lot more time making the “hero” seem heroic and wonderful. Ozai comes across as powerful and dominating, but not at all heroic. The avatar and companions come across as fun, entertaining people that you can laugh at but still sympathize with. The whole thing’s kind of a fun comedy until you get to the end and Azula murders Zuko and Ozai murders the avatar. That’s… not propaganda in favor of Ozai. But because Ozai is shown as powerful and dominating and he wins, the Ember Island Players totally have plausible deniability.

And as for how they wrote Zuko, I think that was plausible deniability. The Avatar’s been public enemy #1 for months now, but the crown prince literally just defected. Zuko is probably a very sensitive topic, and the censors would come down hard on any portrayal of him as sympathetic, intelligent, mature, or just generally someone that would make a good Fire Lord. They don’t need to be as careful with Aang, cause he doesn’t really inspire loyalty in the Fire Nation, but pretty much every adult in the Fire Nation would have grown up seeing Iroh as their future ruler, and every kid/teenager expected to eventually be led by Fire Lord Zuko. So yeah, with two former crown prince’s on the run, I’m guessing the Fire Nation censors are desperately trying to prevent a civil war.

This is a new and semi-successful production from acclaimed Earth Kingdom playwright Pu-on Tim 

For example, play Katara is portrayed as having convinced Jet to drown a whole village by crying a bunch and Koizilla Aang in the play is portrayed as smiling cheerfully as she destroys Fire Nation ships.

1. Kids were taken to see this play. And it’s not shown as something unexpected. SOME adult would have given a parent taking their kids to a R-rated play the stinky eye.

Children are also more likely to relate to the goofy characters, sociopathic or not. They don’t care about what a blowing up ships with a smile means for one’s psych, they care that there are SHIPS BEING BLOWN UP!!!! and THAT CHARACTER IS FUNNY!!!

2. They sold merchandise of the enemies. Try to imagine the USA selling Russian flags during the Cold War. MmmmmmnNOPE

We have merch of fictional villains but anyone walking around in a cosplay of an hypothetical famous war criminal would be very weird. A child doing that as one did of Zuko? I don’t think so.

Also the “who is actually being criticized in this story?” debate happened with Animal Farm too! It was banned at both sides of the conflict. And it (botg play and book) have being interpreted as criticism of BOTH sides.

What I mean is:

The Firelord is obviously a tyrant, and therefore evil, but wouldn’t you also be frustrated if the savior was a century late and all news you hear from his group is about them goofing off?

(Also wouldn’t the guy who failed to capture a kid and then went play with his group look like an idiot?)

Because they put on a story about a sympathetic character with deep emotions who is desperate to find hope, her brother the funny character, and a light-hearted prankster whose stated goal was to bring laughter and harmony to all, and then had them killed at the end by a representation of their leader who was absolutely posed and acted as if he were a villain. And because Ozai wins, nobody can point to the play and say “That’s subversion!”

The people who love Ozai and think he can do no wrong will see a story where Ozai wins. The people who actually understand how drama works will realize that this is a tragedy where the villain wins.

(They did turn Zuko into a buffoon, and they played Azula pretty straight, so it’s not as if they wholly despise their royalty or think Zuko’s a great guy for changing sides… but Ozai is absolutely presented in that story as if he’s a villain, except that in the Fire Nation of course “Ozai wins” is required.)

Like… I’ve read propaganda. In stories which serve as propaganda, they don’t make the entire story be about the “villains” except for approximately two minutes at the end when the “hero” appears, they don’t make the “villains” at all sympathetic, and they spend a lot more time making the “hero” seem heroic and wonderful. Ozai comes across as powerful and dominating, but not at all heroic. The avatar and companions come across as fun, entertaining people that you can laugh at but still sympathize with. The whole thing’s kind of a fun comedy until you get to the end and Azula murders Zuko and Ozai murders the avatar. That’s… not propaganda in favor of Ozai. But because Ozai is shown as powerful and dominating and he wins, the Ember Island Players totally have plausible deniability.

And as for how they wrote Zuko, I think that was plausible deniability. The Avatar’s been public enemy #1 for months now, but the crown prince literally just defected. Zuko is probably a very sensitive topic, and the censors would come down hard on any portrayal of him as sympathetic, intelligent, mature, or just generally someone that would make a good Fire Lord. They don’t need to be as careful with Aang, cause he doesn’t really inspire loyalty in the Fire Nation, but pretty much every adult in the Fire Nation would have grown up seeing Iroh as their future ruler, and every kid/teenager expected to eventually be led by Fire Lord Zuko. So yeah, with two former crown prince’s on the run, I’m guessing the Fire Nation censors are desperately trying to prevent a civil war.

This is a new and semi-successful production from acclaimed Earth Kingdom playwright Pu-on Tim 

For example, play Katara is portrayed as having convinced Jet to drown a whole village by crying a bunch and Koizilla Aang in the play is portrayed as smiling cheerfully as she destroys Fire Nation ships.

Phoenix Queen King Ozai

Ozai declaring himself ‘Phoenix King’ is supposed to show how far around the bent Ozai has gone. And my it is far. 

But if you view it in-universe (the show is set in a sino-centric universe) it becomes even weirder. 

Let me explain:

The phoenix is the embodiment of female power i.e. the Empress; not male i.e. the Emperor. That would be the dragon.

The phoenix represents yin, the dragon yang. 

So Phoenix King is kinda an oxymoron. 

What he did is either declaring that he now is Emperor and Empress in one person. Ozai is taking on the yin part of the yin and yang, on top of the yang of 'king’. He is now, by declaring himself phoenix and dragon, 'complete’. Or, and I am not going down that creepy road, one could argue that by making Azula Fire Lord, he is making her the dragon/husband. 

Anyway …

Now I understand that they wanted to run with the 'reborn from ashes’ aspect, but it makes Ozai, in cultural and show context, sound even more insane than he is. 

On a side note: There is a real phoenix crown, traditionally worn by the Empress (compare picture), and there are even similarities between Ozai’s helmet/crown and the real thing e.g. the wings on the sides. 

 Image source: One, two

The phoenix, in Chinese mythology and tradition, has symbolized the Empress and the yin force since the Yuan Dynasty. 

In ancient and modern Chinese culture, they can often be found in the decorations for weddings or royalty, along with dragons. This is because the Chinese considered the dragon and phoenix symbolic of blissful relations between husband and wife, another common yin and yang (Yin is female and yang is male.) metaphor.

If you want to know the myth behind the dragon and the phoenix go here: 

Headcanon: Suki has blue eyes because she is part Water Tribe.

Geographically speaking, Kyoshi Island is located very close to the South Pole, and it’s plausible that Kyoshi Island and Southern Water Tribe had a lot of interaction before the war. 

Kyoshi peninsula was originally settled by Water Tribe people. With the exception of the Kyoshi Warriors, everyone on the island wears blue robes similar to what we see Sokka and Katara wear in warmer climates. And it seems like the majority of people on the island have blue eyes, not just Suki. Plus, it's super close to the Foggy Swamp so maybe that whole area used to have a significant Water Tribe population?

I guess part of me always knew that, because his scar does look a lot like a handprint:

But still, whenever I thought about the agni kai, I’d imagine Ozai standing over his thirteen-year-old son and firing haphazardly like:

But no, I think he brings his hand right up to Zuko’s face. 

Which would explain, you know, this:

At first, I thought that he backhanded Zuko, like Azula does here.

But when I looked up these photos, it hit me (no pun intended) that we’ve probably seen the exact move that Ozai made:

Just at a different angle, because I imagine that he was standing over Zuko, due to the whole symbolism of height differences.

Still, I think he slowly brought his fire-encased hand up to Zuko’s face and held it there, burning him, just like he was about to do with Aang. The difference being that Aang is able to deflect the attack:

Which he was able to do, because he learned from Zuko.

I think my explanation has been a bit dodgy: Ozai was against Azulon’s colonialism, but he was okay with a different sort of colonialism.

Ozai rejected Azulon’s (and Sozin’s) goal of a Fire Nation that encompassed the Earth Kingdom not just as colonies, but as a single unified nation. Ozai was more interested in exploiting the Earth Kingdom for resources and labour. I understand why these two aims might appear practically the same, but I haven’t yet delved into the after effects of the war.

What complicates things is that so much of the Earth Kingdom was destroyed. Basic infrastructure and much of the agricultural base of the Earth Kingdom was incinerated in the flames of war. In order for Azulon’s goal to be realised, the Fire Nation was pouring resources into the Earth Kingdom to bring it up to the standard of the Fire Nation. Ozai “dismantling the colonies” was more specifically withdrawing assets from regions that weren’t yet “functional”, and re-installing military control over functional regions (which had civilian governments of both Fire and Earth natives).

In other words, Ozai was quite happy to set up labour camps where they were easy to set up and leave the rest of the Earth Kingdom to descend into a trash heap. While Azulon has the foresight (or perhaps even compassion) to develop the Earth Kingdom, Ozai was only ever thinking about short term Fire Nation interests.

The only option, in Ozai’s mind, was to wipe out that population. I know it's a cliche at this point, but Ozai's plan really wasn't all that different from Hitler's. Hitler wanted to depopulate Eastern Europe of the Slavic people so Germanic people could move into that land. Of course, it would still be extremely expensive to invest in completely rebuilding the infrastructure of a ruined nation. But with Earth Kingdom citizens out of the way, they at least wouldn’t have to set up martial law everywhere to keep order.

Toph’s ability to see using earthbending is possible in my world – it just doesn’t function as it’s depicted in the show. In the show we see an outwards radiation from her foot, which I think does a good job at telling us that sight is somehow happening. It’s reminiscent of echolocation or sonar, but I don’t this is how it works. The show also suggests that her foot is the thing doing the sensing, and this isn’t how it works in my world either.

The key thing to understand is that “blindbending” is bending something without influencing it. The common understanding of bending associates it with moving stuff, but my understanding of bending is that it’s only about engaging with something. For most benders this engagement does result in movement, but some skilled benders can “feel” the substance without making it move. There are two ways that this can be done. The first is to have a sort of intrinsic connection to the thing you’re bending, to feel it as it’s stationary; this is the more sensitive method. The second is to apply extremely delicate amounts of force on the thing you’re bending, to feel the resistance and discover its properties; this is less sensitive. Regardless of which method an individual uses, most benders who are capable of this are limited to sensing shape. For highly trained individuals they can sense pressure. For a prodigy like Toph, she can sense vibrations and pressure at a minute scale.

Toph is feeling vibrations in the earth – but not with her foot. Her foot is just her physical connection to the earth which allows her bending/spiritual connection to be strong enough to sense minute vibrations. She can sense that someone is walking because of the vibrations in nearby earth. She can tell that someone is standing at a particular location by feeling the pressure that they exert on the ground beneath their feet.

Airbenders can do something similar. In the show it’s said that airbenders shaved their heads to increase their sensitivity to air and I think this isn’t exactly true. Blindbenders don’t have enhanced physical sensation. It might be true that they’re more mindful of the sensations that they do have access to, but their physical bodies aren’t enhanced by their bending. Their sight stems from their bending abilities. An air blindbender sees by feeling displacement of air. Waterbenders can do something similar to airbenders by creating a mist, but the detail of their mental map doesn’t have the same resolution of the airbenders.

There are two other interesting points I’d like to mention. The first is that blindbenders could also be deaf. If they’re capable of sensing minute vibrations, then they can have superhuman hearing. Airbenders and waterbenders can feel the vibrations in the air, while earthbenders can use the ground as a sort of listening device. Moving things create vibrations that could enter into the blindbender’s sphere of influence (the region that their bending extends to). The real question is how far these things can occur for them to still leave a decipherable mark. As distance increases, there’s more and more irrelevant noise that the blindbender would detect. Apparently, consumer long-distance sound recording devices can hear conversations from at least 200 metres away. It seems fair to give prodigy airbenders to hear conversations at least 300 metres distant, considering their listening device is a half-sphere with a radius of about 30 metres rather a microphone with a small dish.

The second is that echolocation and sonar might have their uses. The principles of sonar and echolocation are relatively simple. You create a controlled vibration and then listen for echoes. Plug what you hear into some crazy maths and you can map things. The most practical application I can think of in my world is waterbenders using this to locate schools of fish.

The Air Nomads in the show don’t satisfy my world at all. I’m reinventing the Air Nomads.

In my opinion, the Air Nomads in the show are constructed to be a punching bag for the Fire Nation. The other nations all have their own issues, but the Nomads are painted as some sort of wonderland to be ravaged by the Fire Nation. I want to give the Air Nomads are bit more character.

Basically, the Air Nomads we see in Aang’s flashbacks are just a small sub-section of the air nomad society. I make the distinction between “air nomads”, which is used to describe all peoples of what we might otherwise call the Air Nation, and the “air monks”, which is what we see in the show.

The air monks

The reason that all monks are airbenders is that all air nomad newborns are tested for their ability to airbend (via ancient talismans or whatever you want). If they are airbenders, they are taken by the Temple and raised as monks. This makes the Air Nomads quite odd in that we have a complete separation between benders and non-benders.

Now that I think about it, the show never really explains why the air monks are monks. The monastic life is associated with asceticism as a method for study and devotion. But what are the air monks doing this for? What is it that the monks study and are devoted to?

Tibetan monks and Guru Laghima’s “let go your earthly tether” are obviously Buddhist – but what does this mean in the context of the world of Avatar? One understanding might be that the end goal of enlightenment is to become a spirit, or something of that nature.

Whatever theology the air monks once followed, by the time we join the story through Aang and Roku’s flashbacks, the air monks are entirely focused on airbending. Aang is able to become a master purely through being a prodigy airbender. Individual, theological and perhaps even spiritual development are all secondary to the art of airbending in Aang’s time. What we have to remember is that the monks have apparently been around for over 8000 years. That their culture shifts with time is quite normal, and it’s quite possible that given enough time the monks would have swayed back to Laghima’s culture.

Air bison

Air bison are ridiculous. They can fly with very few caveats.. They can be domesticated. The air nomads had the potential to be commercial and military powerhouses. I can’t help but think of an alternate universe where “everything changed when the Air Nomads attacked”, and they come swooping in like the Mongols but if Mongols could fly.

The main problem I see with the air bison is that the other nations didn’t get in on this air bison business. There must be something that not only prevented the other nations from domesticating air bisons for themselves. Considering what we see in the show, it makes sense that only airbenders have the ability to truly tame and control the bison. Apparently anyone can fly one, but bison are only truly loyal to an airbender.

The air nomads

I guess it’s pretty straight forward. There were nomads, and they were of the “air nation”. Like most real-world nomadic societies, the air nomads were made up of many different and independent nomadic communities. There were pretty much no nomad airbenders because they all went to the prestigious Temple.

The natural question is: how did these nomads maintain a lifestyle in the mountains, especially since the nomads are unable to tame air bison. I think the answer is that air monks were attached to nomadic communities (similar to missionaries). These monks provided their bison to the nomads. It’s not clear to me if the nomads relied on some sort of scavenging or herding, but either way the reliance of the nomads on the monks makes for some interesting dynamics. For example, warring nomads would have to be conscious of the politics within the Temple in order to maintain the support of their attached monks (I don’t think the monks were always pacifist).

I guess I’ll list my issues with how the culture is structured and provide my own headcanon answers.

Issue 1: To begin with, Nomadic Monks aren’t a thing, as far as I know. The concept is pretty contradictory, monks tend to stick pretty close to their temple/monastery and nomads are defined by not sticking around anywhere.

Answer 1: I agree with your idea of distinguishing the Air Monks from the Air Nomads. My theory is that the Air Monks/Nuns are the cultural and political elite of their society. They believe that any sort of family structure is an earthly attachment that impedes enlightenment, so they encourage Air Nomads (their society’s commoners) to give up their airbending children to the monks to be raised communally.

The children are trained by the Air Monks/Nuns to master airbending and understand their culture’s theology. The exceptionally talented or thoughtful children are recruited to be monks themselves, while the unexceptional ones are expected to leave the temples and become Air Nomads by adulthood. I’d like to think, in preparation for nomadic life, air children are granted more freedom to travel and explore on their own as they master more tiers of airbending. Since Aang became a master by age 12, he’s probably had close to adult levels of freedom since he was probably like 10-ish. That’s how he managed to have so many friends all over the world at such a young age.

This also explains why the monks focused so much on teaching the children airbending, rather than providing a Guru Pathik-style spiritual education. If most children are destined to be nomads, their first priority would be teach them survival skills (airbending) rather than theology. Had Aang been allowed to experience a normal Avatar’s journey, he would have had a whole 4 years to better understand the finer points of the Air nation’s belief system before his world adventure.

I’m going to say adulthood for them starts at age 16, because that seems to be the number that Avatar defaults to for any coming-of-age event; the Avatar journey and Northern Water Tribe marriage both happen at that age. Sokka (15), Yue (16), and Zuko (16) really struggle with understanding what it means to become an adult, while all the 14 and under characters don’t seem to give the notion too much thought just yet.

I imagine, before being revealed to be the Avatar, Aang assumed he was on a fast track to high-status monkhood. Hence why Aang identifies as a monk a few times in the series. Of course, a twelve-year-old really has no idea what actually being a monk really entails; in Aang’s child mind, it might just mean “really powerful Airbender with authority.” Then he sees Katara and all thoughts of lifelong celibacy fly out the window.

Issue 2: I straight up just hate the “Air Nomads can all bend because their lifestyle makes them crazy spiritual” excuse. Cause non-benders don’t have it hard enough without the implication that they choose to be spiritually deficient and it’s their fault they don’t have superpowers. Besides that whole mess of unfortunate undertones, why does airbending even have this requirement? It’s not there for any of the other elements; we see plenty of non-spiritual people bend Earth and Fire. If the four elements are supposed to balance each other, then their barriers to entry should be comparable.

Answer 2: The “we’re just that spiritual” explanation is nothing more than Air Monk propaganda told to the children they train. Air Nomads who give birth to non-benders cannot send their children to the Air Temples to be raised because their culture assumes a lack of bending is a reflection of moral/spiritual “failing”. If we assume that everything we know about the Airbenders comes from Aang exclusively, then the show’s rose-tinted portrayal of the Air people makes sense. Aang only grew up around other airbenders, so how was he to know that Air Nation non-benders existed? It would also explain why Aang has such a hard time accepting any sort of industrialization that would improve life for non-benders. He really wasn’t raised to consider the perspective of ordinary people.

As for what happens to non-benders, I think there’s two options. The first, and more common option, is that they’re given up for adoption in another nation. The family structure is not “organic” to Air Nomad culture. Children are expected to be raised by communally by a collective of wise monks/nuns, so your average Air Nomad mother can’t fathom raising a baby all on her own. And “fatherhood” as a social or economic role is simply not a concept in their culture.

However, there’s always going to be Air Nomads that rebel against their culture and form families. These Air Nomads keep their children, both bender and non-bender, and are ostracized by the Air Nation. From the perspective of the Air Nation, they’re being arrogant, selfish, and irresponsible; instead of heeding the advice of their “wiser” elders and giving the children to people more experienced in raising them (Monks/Nuns for airbenders and orphanages for nonbenders), they “feel” they know better and choose to “hoard” their children to appease their own egos. Or course these rebel Air Nomads would argue that giving up a child that you created to be raised by someone else is even more callous, selfish, and irresponsible. It’s up to the audience to determine who they should agree with.

Issue 3: If they’re nomads, what are they following? Mike and Bryan seem to think that a nomad is just a perpetual tourist who goes where ever they want and when ever they want. In reality, nomadic life is all about following your vital resources. If you’re a hunter nomad, you follow migration patterns; if you’re a herding nomad, you have a set grazing territory you travel within; if you’re a trading nomad, you travel to different population centers to sell your wares. So what did the Air Nomads do?

Answer 3: Since they’re all brought up vegetarian, I doubt most Air Nomads would be comfortable being hunters. Especially since butchers are pretty much universally regarded as the lowest caste of people in Asia. Since Air Nomads are constantly in flight, there’s really no animals they could herd. Sky Bison are pair bonding animals that don’t appear to travel in packs.

This leads me to believe that the Air Nomads were a variety of traders and service-types. One service I could see being very common would be transportation. They would utilize their sky bison to help take travelers to where ever they needed to be for a small price. This might explain why everyone in Avatar seems to write and speak in the same language. Their cultures developed in a world where essentially plane-taxis were always readily available to everyone. And if world travel was that accessible to the masses, there might have been a greater push to create a universal language and writing system.

This would make Sozin’s genocide of the Air Nation even more atrocious on a global scale. He essentially made the Fire Nation ships the only means of safe transportation for the other nations. He created a false monopoly.

Other nomadic-ish occupations I could see airbenders taking up:

* Spirit soothers. Essentially capitalizing off the Air Nomad spiritual image to perform exorcisms for homes and villages.

* Merchants. Using their bending and bisons to acquire rare goods for sale in different countries.

* Odd jobs workers. I’m sure access to flight would make them handy for many situations.

The purpose of the Air Temples would be to serve as a sanctuary, hospital, and embassy to the Air Nomads. While they couldn’t stay there too long, all Air Nomads were welcome to seek refuge in the temples if they were exhausted or sick. Of course, they were also expected to make generous “donations”, as well. Air temples were also expected to look after all ill, injured, or pregnant Air Nomads until they were back to peak health. Finally, any crimes committed by an Air Nomad in another nation were to be dealt with by the Air Temples. Punishments for lesser crimes were provided by the Air Temples, usually some form of community service around the temple. More severe were handed over to the prisons of the nation they committed the crimes in.