for those unfamiliar btw Eriksonâs psychosocial stages of development is a theory that proposes that everyone goes through specific challenges at specific ages, and they have to resolve these crises to live a fulfilling life.
(Eriksons Psychosocial Stages)
This post is interesting because Eriksons system was originally meant to apply to real life relationships, and this proposes that this can also be applicable to fictional characters
Identity vs Role Confusion relates to teenagers having to discover their place in the world. failing to do so results in confusion about said place and an unstable identity. Connecting to kinning for obvious reasons, especially because at that age itâs typical for people to latch on to figures in their life to figure out their own role. Considering that kinning is most common amongst queer, neurodivergent, and gender diverse youth, it is definitely possible that a lack of positive role models/ and or affirmation concerning their identity could lead to basing their identity off of fictional characters instead, especially since fictional characters provide a sense of stability that real people do not. Headcanoning these characters, also, allows children to create an ideal role model that canât disappoint them, as opposed to potentially unsupportive family/friends.
Transitioning then to Intimacy vs Isolation, which is typically seen as needing to find a close relationship (usually assumed to be romantic, though not necessarily) or suffer from isolation and again, a lack of stability. Assuming that the group we are looking at partook in kinning or something similar in the stage before, itâs especially interesting to consider that with a lack of real role models, young adults grow up to be uncertain and untrusting of real relationships. Of course, this is not always the case in selfshipping (shipping oneself with a fictional character), but it is common that these relationships are used for affirmation and a sense of stability that is often not found in interpersonal relationships. (I will use interpersonal relationships as a term to refer specifically to real life relationships) The fact that OP proposes that, for lack of a more scientific word, âimaginaryâ relationships are just as viable to oneâs self discovery and psychosocial development, is one that is very novel.
A lot of time, people that tend to fit into these categories are deemed to be in some way socially inept or âweirdâ/âcringe.â It is a common take to respond to selfshipping by treating it as a mentally ill behavior, and saying that said individuals should âtouch grass.â Instead, like OP says, I believe that these relationships are significantly valuable to development. Many selfshippers are completely satisfied in their relationships, including aromantic and asexual people who are not interested in interpersonal relationships. I believe this can also be extended to objectum people (those who are attracted romantically and/or sexually to inimate objects.) Again, this is something that is typically seen as impossible to be fulfilling.
Basically, What Iâm trying to say is that we need to consider that development and relationships do not always occur in a ânormalâ way. Just like how some people wouldnât be happy in an interpersonal relationship with someone who doesnât fulfill their needs, some peopleâs needs are better fulfilled without actual interpersonal relationships in totality, and that doesnât mean that someoneâs development is lesser or flawed.