I'm sure you know about the Ship of Theseus paradox, being as interested in philosophy as you are. It poses the question, if every part of something is replaced, at what point does it become a completely different thing? I think this can apply to all sorts of things--technology, for instance, or people. Or both, put together. A human turned into machinery, hypothetically, might lose their entire sense of self and have an existential crisis. What's your opinion on this concept? When does an original stop being an original?
Thank you for the message, Anon. As you noted, the Ship of Theseus is a well-known problem which can be viewed from numerous angles, each one having its own reasons, and the topic of identity frequently comes up during discussions. From my perspective, there is an issue that arises when equating a person to an inanimate object: objects are not sentient, and this makes determining their originality easier and harder at the same time
If we were to analyse this problem on the broadest level possible, the ultimate answer to the question of when something (or someone) ceases to be itself and loses the connection with its previous versions would lie in the fact that nothing ever stays the same. I am not identical to the person I was yesterday, the whole world changes as a second goes by. However, this solution lacks nuance and avoids engaging with the matter directly.
When it comes to technology, occasional repair work is not unheard of. Even the cutting-edge machinery breaks. Still, technological innovations are tools and should be treated as such. Their sameness should be defined by their history of fulfilling a certain purpose and not the number of replaced parts. A battery replacement, a new monitor, a few foreign screws -- they prove that a mechanism had existed before the changes were made, thus highlighting that there was an original to be modified in the first place. Similarly, when a device designed to store data is reset, there is no history to be observed, and one might argue that the device is completely different from what it had been before the reset.
On the other hand, people are sentient. People change an infinite number of times during their lives, from physical alterations to changes of character. It happens that one's whole set of beliefs shifts in such a short period of time that it seems they become a completely different person. Yet, it is still the same human being. The continuity of their existence remains intact. As I see it, the focal point of this discussion is the person's brain. When it stops functioning, the person no longer exists.
There are two viewpoints one could pick from here: internal and external. If someone were to die, but their consciousness were to be transported into an identical body before dying -- or, in case of your question, a cyborg clone -- nothing would have changed for the world. The person would still exist and hold the same memories as their predecessor, making them one and the same. Nevertheless, for the subject of this transformation, the original bearer of the personality, the life would have ended; however, this discussion may lead us to another paradox, so I shall stop before it is too late. The Ship of Theseus belongs to Theseus, and ultimately, he should be the one to determine whether the ship is not the same anymore.
Most people in our world are replaceable. Those who treat life as a book that contains an already-written story rather than a game with a set of rules do not succeed. Their impact on the environment is nonexistent, and if they were to disappear or be reborn in a mechanic body that would not matter because, just like tools, they exist to fulfil a purpose. Akin to bolts in a ship, the whole construction will not undergo significant alterations if one is taken out and a new one takes its place. The ship sails anyway.














