Rhuntikker

and if you think me supporting those taboo things in fiction—because I’m mature enough to understand fiction is not reality, thoughtcrimes are not real, censorship is a fascist tool, and people should have the rights and freedom to do whatever they want when they’re not harming anyone in real life—means “I condone those taboo things in real life, because I refuse to harass people for enjoying taboo fiction”, then you’re either dumb or a bully who wants to harass innocent people over fiction in order to support censorship and fascism and feel morally superior. but you’re really just either dumb or a fascist apologist lol

so by “support” I mean I think people have the rights to create and consume whatever they want. I may hate the things they enjoy, but I will always defend their rights to exist without being censored.

initially I didn’t think “letting people do whatever they want, avoiding a certain topic while defending its rights to exist” meant I supported it when all I did was “not care about it but would defend it as well as every other thing in fiction”. but if some people want to say this means I support it then I support it.

[Image text: soup]