it was annoying so I put it here

Hi, we're quoigenicfromhell or QFH and this is our system discourse blog. Started it because the tag made us mad but we didn't want to just dump a bunch of discourse on our main followers who probably just followed for our funny shitpost reblogs and fan art.

Syscourse stance or whatever

We are quoigenic in the sense of 'this is not the right question to be asking, it isn't discoverable, and we just don't really care/it isn't your business'. In some sense we are more closely aligned with endogenic systems because we have funky little ideas about what we are and where we came from, and we've mostly hung out in that space/mixed spaces for 13 years.

Pro-endo in a everyone has the right to define their own existence way. Also in the I think there are many different ways to be plural and rigid lines/definitions are antithetical to how life and people usually operate way.

I am not against purposefully created systems or sysmates, but I believe using the word tulpa is at least in poor taste and depending on how it's approached, racist. I understand there's difficulty in changing the vernacular but believe it would be a good move for the community.

What's your fuckin deal

We are quoigenic, a gateway, and a collective (not system.) We use collective, collective member, headmate, or collectivite to talk about ourselves. Please do not use alters or parts for us.

We are traumatized and have been diagnosed with PTSD; we probably have cPTSD. We've done extensive therapy for it and it is now manageable.

The ableism existed before the diagnosis did, gang. Ableism isn't strictly confined to the DSM, it's based on what society sees as 'crazy', which often has nothing to do with actual mental illness.

We saw a blog saying "I'm [character] for real, I'm super source attached" and it was an anti-endo blog sharing the same source as a newbie of ours who straight up could not imagine a version of himself that just hates a type of person for existing. It made him pretty uncomfortable.

Plurality is for anyone who feels like they are more than one. It is an umbrella term that can conceivably cover anyone. Endogenic, traumagenic, DID, created systems, whatever. It does not specify any kind of particular framework or function.

Plurality does not 'have a small overlap' with DID or medical models, plural was coined and used by a mix of people who were both medically recognized and not, it was intended to cover any and all of these experiences.

You can choose not to identify with plurality if you want to but plurality is not one specific thing functioning one specific way, you can't make it a specific thing without perverting how it was coined, who it has historically been used by, and who it's used by currently.