Preaching to the Void

By tying rent to the minimum wage, you are essentially making it impossible to build or sell housing that's worth above a certain amount. Depending on location, this could mean not being able to afford to build anything at all.

Tying minimum wage to (what I assume to be) the median price of housing is a much more natural solution. The majority of housing (because it's the median) will still be affordable, and there will still be housing to either side of the median for those who want more or less.

You Bootstrap fucks will bend over backwards to defend owners' "right" to depress wages because "that's what your labor is worth" and "if you want more, work harder". You refuse to raise the minimum wage because somehow the label of "unskilled labor" means that you don't need to earn enough to stay alive. And then you have the audacity to turn around and tell us that needing help to buy food makes us the problem.

Dishes of candy at an office/during Halloween, free samples, and free donuts back when I worked at a place with free donuts set out in the break room every weekend, are a free things that come to mind.

Some people reason as if the only motivation behind hoarding is greed, but that's not it at all. In reality, people will scarcly ever take more than they can utilize. It's common sense: who would want to have six jerry cans of gas taking up space in their house just for the sake of taking up space? Who would want to take more food than they can eat so that the extra can go bad? Who would want to have bottles of medicine they'll never take clogging up their cupboard just to have them there?