OffullyPrivy

ring is passing the surveillance they collect to ice

ring is using these ID features to search for/identify people that ice wants to deport/kidnap/disappear, & using it to spy on Americans in general.

This ad is the company's gross & sneaky attempt to appeal to humans' kindness [ I'll be helping people find their pets!" ]

They are trying to trick more people into buying this tool that will be used as surveillance on people living in the USA

AND~!!!

This post talks about

Fantasy sex toys

Zoophilia

So if thats not your fancy then this post is a pass

So recently I had someone accuse me of being a zoophile

Something that I will say out the gate doesn't hold any merit whatsoever. A lot of the "evidence" they sited, is faulty "they're gross and I dont like them so they're this now". I didn't even want to entertain this person bc any time I do there's always a continuation of their incessant harassment and stalking. Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised they're reading this since nothing escapes their depravity but I digress.

One of the reasons they sited as me being zoophilic was my take on fantasy sex toys and in particular the knotted ones.

I'm always of the mindset of "do no harm and no harm will be done on you" kinda wolf but maturing especially in college when I had to take courses on the psychology attraction and -inevitably- they mentioned paraphilias, I learned a lot of flaws that came with this mindset bc I used to believe that fantasy toys were indicative of some sort of malicious desire.

Come to learn, it's not as black and white.

For one, zoophilia is described as the persistent interest in animals sexually, so it would make sense to say "oh if a toy is vaguely shaped in an animalistic way then its bad" but then I learned about anthropomorphism.

Anthropomorphism is the act of artistic renditions of attributing human aspects to otherwise non-human creatures. Yall aren't strangers to furries, but thats why anthro yiff is not registered as "exploitative material" to law enforcement or the FBI.

Having crushes be it romantic or sexual to anthropomorphic creatures is not zoophilic bc youre attracted to the human aspects of said creature rather than the animalistic traits, something someone who has zoophilia would gravitate towards.

Animals cant consent, beastiality is harmful bc the animal is not intellectually developed to consent- let alone communicate consent. It's psychologically proven they have the mental age of a human 3 year old at best. It's harmful because the illness makes sufferers experience intrusive thoughts in taking control from a less intelligent form of life, making it inherently abusive as thats a power dynamic that cant be compensated for.

Now if this were an anthropomorphic creature who can speak, think like an adult, and is within their ability to consent then that wouldn't be zoophilic bc to have zoophilia you'd have an inclination to take advantage of a life form that CAN'T do that.

"But that doesnt answer the question of why have non-human genitals"

In which i say, you can anthropomorphize that as well.

Im gonna be a bit vulgar here but stay with me, if I put a knot on a human member, thats not an animal peen bc thats been anthropromorphized to look separate from animal accurate parts.

And I can say as someone who has grown up with dogs and works with animals, a lot of the fantasy toys you'd see in some store like spencers arent accurate...like at all.

Just trust me on that and dont go searching for weird shit 💀

So long as they aren't incredibly referencing the real thing or god forbid, live casting/scan casting. AND they're anthropomorphic i see no problem with knotted fantasy toys bc at the end of the day monsters don't fucking exist (and if they did I would gatekeep them from all you monster fuckers and keep them for myself)

A shop i love to buy from, Wandering bard, anthropomorphizes their toys bc they're based on DND monsters. The werewolf one they have is an anthropomorphic creature not accurate to any living creature (and also werewolves dont exist unless you count me but god didnt bless me with a kidney crushing shlong).

Werewolves are man, wolf hybrids. I love werewolves but in the way a furry loves them.

Im not into the twilight werewolves bc those are...Just wolves. I like the vanhesling werewolf bc a muscle bod makes my head dizzy. I love werewolves bc there's something hot about a man who also so happens to be a blood lusting monster by night.

This post was just a build up to tell you how much I love werewolves. Thats it.

But in all seriousness, let's not lessen the definitions of zoophilia and beastiality and why these things are a serious topic and trivialize them by likening them to what is essentially a silicone butter sock.

And to compare the two really distracts away from actual abuse that still is happening till this day (cough cough whats happening at MFF). Like let's please focus on actual harm on animals people are getting away with and stop witchhunting the monster fuckers.

Minors Against Online “Safety”. I feel like messages against censorship “for the children” will be more effective coming from the children it’s claiming to protect.

Here’s the plan: Find your state’s senators and house representatives. Call them, email them, tell them every little way these bills are detrimental, to BOTH children and adults. Most importantly, do it CONSTANTLY. At least once every few days, IF NOT MORE. AND, tell your friends and classmates to do it too. Regardless of political orientation, I can’t imagine any teen taking kindly to the idea of their internet access being limited or completely revoked.

The bills we’re targeting are: KOSA (requires age verification to access many websites), KOSMA (bans people under 13 from using social media) , the SCREEN act (blocks content seen as harmful to minors for ALL audiences), Block BEARD (supposedly protects against foreign piracy), and the Take It Down act(blocks content seen as sexually obscene to ALL audiences), which has already passed but is ridiculously unconstitutional, so maybe we can get the Supreme Court on that.

Some good points that you may want to bring up (if you can think of any others, put them in comments, please!)

- The SCREEN act could limit a teen’s access to Sex Ed, especially for the lgbtq+ community, who don’t always get taught how to stay safe in schools.

- While this might cut down on kids access to negative content, it could also very easily cut down on access to positive content as well. (e.g. , a child becomes suicidal. While they might no longer have access to material encouraging them to commit, they will likely also lose access to material discouraging them as well)

- A lot of the big companies that would have to enforce these policies are subject to data breaches. What would happen if a predator got access to a list of users containing their ages?

- Block BEARD could lead to many non-profit sites being banned in the U.S. (such as AO3, a fanfiction website that has content tagging and filtering systems put in place, that would likely make it difficult for a child to encounter obscene content, if supervised properly by their guardians.)

- The president has specifically stated that he intends to to use the Take It Down Act to censor those who disagree with him. Not only is this a pretty direct violation of the First Amendment, the government has also put policies like this in place before, to undesirable effects (Alien and Sedition Act).

- Neurodivergent kids. Socializing in person can be quite hard for many ND children, but sites like Discord can be an outlet to help them find connection. KOSMA will ban kids under 13 from social media, which is not only somewhat useless in itself, seeing that most big social media sites either require this already or are specifically for children, but also doesn’t account for the possibility of a child using their parent’s account.

- China. China is infamous in the western world for the unbelievable amount of censorship it puts on its citizens online activity, but not even China requires this kind of age verification.

- A child’s parents should be the one in charge of what they deem too inappropriate for their child, not the government. What if abrahamic religion was considered obscene? How would Christian and Jewish and Muslim parents educate their children on their beliefs?

First of little bit about me

Hi, I am Privy. I am a transfem in my 20's. Despite the fact I go by no pronouns, I am actually multigender as I identify as all genders and no genders - But you can call me feminine terms to keep it simple. I have full lack of empathy and can't really experience emotions outside of anger, so I may come of as blunt. Try to keep this in mind. I am also a DID system and have ADHD + few other diagnosis. This blog will be exclusively about my fictionkinity, but feel free to check out my other account @privytothescripture for more overall content or if you're interested in possibly asking questions about pedophilic condition, from someone who studies it, I also have blog for that @pepsiwildcherrim

Like I said on my very first post on this blog: “Don’t give up Don’t ever give up”

The Block Bad Electronic Art and Recording Distributors Act (Block BEARD Act)

And the equally ridiculous and ineffective Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act

Both of these acts seek to force Internet Service Providers to block access to foreign piracy websites. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has said this is ridiculous and ineffective, that site-blocking bills only serve to censor the internet and make it more unsafe for everyone. AND THE'YRE RIGHT!!!

Piracy has existed until the dawn of time. And pirates will find ways around bills like these with no issue. But these bills are still dangerous and essentially pave the way for your ISP to block whatever our government thinks is "Objectionable". These DINOSAURS who dont understand the internet have no BUSINESS creating legislation around it. This is a bald faced attempt to block the internet for users for corporate gain. Wanna know how I know that?

The people that have endorsed the bill

Are all

People

Who

Would benefit from a bill like this. CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES!! TELL THEM YOU DO NOT SUPPORT EITHER OF THESE BILLS! OR KOSA WHILE YOURE AT IT! TELL THEM YOU OPPOSE INTERNET CENSORSHIP IN ALL FORMS!

We will not sit idly by while these GHOULS try and block and censor a free Internet!

“BUT I DONT WANT PEOPLE TO TAKE IT THE WRONG WAY!”

“BUT NOT IN A SEXUAL WAY!”

and what i will say in response is, why are you ashamed of sexuality? why are you ashamed of instinct? why are you ashamed to potentially associate with kink?

it is true there are people who might treat you weirdly if they suspect it’s sexual, but at the end of the day those people likely hate you already for some other reason (ie: if you’re not white, able bodied, or cishet).

provided you are physically safe, should you care about the opinions of others? NO.