Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018) | dir. David Yates
YOU ARE THE REASON
Misplaced Lens Cap
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Sade Olutola

blake kathryn
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!
almost home
RMH

tannertan36

oozey mess

ellievsbear
NASA
wallacepolsom
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Today's Document

#extradirty
$LAYYYTER
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Israel

seen from Singapore
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
@pottertrashfan
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018) | dir. David Yates

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
“It’s Christmas, Hermione,” said Harry lazily; he was rereading Flying with the Cannons for the tenth time in an armchair near the fire.
ravenclaw: *pulls out a box*
ravenclaw: we're going to put the things we love in the box.
gryffindor: can i put hufflepuff in the box?
ravenclaw: no.
slytherin: can i put hufflepuff in the box?
ravenclaw: no.
gryffindor: ....can i please—
ravenclaw: no one is putting hufflepuff in the box!
Quality friendship posts I expect on my dash
HARRY POTTER SPELLS (6/8) ↳ Nox - Piertotum Locomotor
Christmas was coming. One morning in mid-December, Hogwarts woke to find itself covered in several feet of snow. The lake froze solid and Weasly twins were punished for bewitching several snowballs so that they followed Quirrell around, bouncing off the back of his turban.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Actual question.
Why are hufflepuffs and slytherins always paired together? All the head canons show hufflepuffs and slytherins as best friends? Where are the Ravenclaw-Hufflepuff friends? The Gryffindor-Hufflepuff friends? The Gryffindor-Slytherin friends? Gryffindor-Ravenclaw? Slytherin-Ravenclaw? SHOW ME THE FRIENDSHIPS!
Johnny Depp will always be my Grindelwald 💚 FU warner bros. 🌵
The Houses as Imposters
Hufflepuff: Didn’t want to kill anybody so just ran around sabotaging the whole time yet still won.
Ravenclaw: Has a plan and never will be suspected even if they don’t know how to play yet.
Slytherin: Found the game first and has lots of practice so is good at it.
Gryffindor: Kills in front of people, thinking they won’t get caught.
My Reaction to “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald”
Back to the Wizarding World and reunited with mah zoo son.
Let’s see how this goes!
Keep reading
I would pull a Wormtail and cut off my own hand to go back to Universal Orlando and spend the day at the Wizarding World of Harry Potter.
Me

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
everybody is pointing out that voldemort was born in 1926 therefore we could see a young tom riddle during the fantastic beasts franchise at hogwarts. but no one is pointing out that hagrid was born in 1928 and attended hogwarts at the same time so it’s also possible for us to get a scene where newt scamander, magizoologist, meets rubeus hagrid, creature enthusiast extraordinare.
Hey, angsty Queenie thoughts
CRIMES OF GRINDELWALD SPOILERS BELOW! PLEASE BEWARE!
Keep reading
A very good inciteful read. Now I get the feeling op doesn’t agree with Queenie’s decisions, but op definitely, like me, possibly understands them.
Unpopular Opinions and a Long Rant on The Crimes of Grindelwald (spoilers ahead)
I’m going to try to go in order here, but mostly this is an I’ve had 24 hours to digest this movie so I can come back and talk about it with a clearer mind. This mostly revolves around Queenie
Queenie doing the thing
I get her now. I understand the anger behind fans, it seemed weird but let's look at this broadly and not under a microscope. I don’t think we’re meant to be sympathetic toward her or agree with her, but be able to see where she is coming from. From what I understand of the story and her character, in general, is she is our window to see how Grindelwald got the following he did. For all intents and purposes, Grindelwald is, at this current time, the Wizarding World’s Hitler. To better explain, and I don’t think you’re stupid or need to be talked down to but I need to explain it this way so everyone can understand, the National Socialist Workers Party, or Nazi Party as we know it today, was meant to be inclusive, it was meant to attract a wide group of people that, at the end of the day, wanted war. It did not matter on who, but the Nazi party was unquestionably founded on the principle that war was needed to establish Germany’s power in Europe. After we see Grindelwald’s rally, we can clearly also see that at Grindelwald’s core, he just wants war. His argument is war for equality, war for superiority, war for power, and Queenie see this as a way out of the old norms of the inability to legally marry a No-Maj, and if that means siding with Grindelwald then that is what she is going to do. Now, I am in absolutely no way apologizing for her actions or siding with her actions, but do I understand where she is coming from? Yes, I do. Queenie has never been one to do things without going to the extreme and this is no exception. When she went to Paris she felt like she lost everyone she loved. Her sister is nowhere to be found, she left the love of her life in a different country, she is overwhelmed in a country where she doesn’t understand the language, the customs, and unable to block out all the voices in her head, so when someone offers her a helping hand and a way out, she takes it. In her mind, Grindelwald and his followers have been the only ones to accept what she wants indiscriminately. Tina, Newt, even Jacob had all been…not against her, but hesitant to help her with what she wants. Queenie’s motivation has been and always will be love. So do I feel sympathetic to Queenie, no I do not, she made very bad choices consistently, but do I understand where she is coming from, absolutely, and most importantly what I think her major purpose of this movie is that she is our window, because, without her, Grindelwald’s rise to power is hard to understand. We see that Grindelwald is in the habit of promising things to people, blanket promises to large groups, but specific individual promises to people like Credence, Queenie, and Leta. He finds their biggest weaknesses, Credence’s existential crisis, Queenie’s need to be able to love without consequences, and Leta’s want to be included and be separated from the labels society put on her as a Slytherin, a Lestrange, and the guilt she carries for killing her own brother. The only difference is Leta saw through the lies and faulty promises of Grindelwald and paid the price. If we look back to the first scene where I think we can all collectively agree she essentially roofied Jacob, but this almost makes sense to her motivation, how she is willing to do anything to not have consequences if she married Jacob. My memory may serve me incorrectly, but I believe that love potions were illegal and this was established in HBP. If I am correct Queenie is already breaking the law that way. But we have Newt and Jacob call her out for enchanting Jacob and that is when she runs away. Already from the get-go, we have established she is willing to go to extreme lengths to get what she wants. Will Jacob and Queenie’s relationship survive this? I have no idea. I hope it does, but I know it would be hard for me to move past a stunt like this if my loved one did that. Now Jacob did forgive her for enchanting him, but he was very hurt at this last decision and mirroring their earlier conversation actually calls her crazy and that was it for Queenie. The girl who probably got called crazy by people at school at Ilvermorny because she could read minds, the girl who got called crazy growing up around No- Majs for the weird stuff that happens around her and her family, the daughter who was so different than Tina had found the last straw. If they were going to treat her this way, but Grindelwald and his followers who would welcome her with open arms then she sure as hell was going to go with the one who promised a world where she could do and get what she wanted. So she would go, kicking and screaming and crying and in the eyes of everyone watching she betrayed them and that is when it finally hits them that this is what she feels she has been driven to do. But what this movie does better than most movies that have come out, in my opinion, is it gives a likable character a major flaw that can’t be justified. Joining a group meant to bring down a large portion of humanity, bad. Breaking the law, bad. Drugging your boyfriend because he didn’t want you to get thrown in prison for marrying a No-Maj, bad. Her introduction in this was meant to show the audience the lengths she would go to. This goes both ways. She is willing to go to jail to marry Jacob because she loves him so much, but she is willing to do anything to make herself happy, even if that means joining a dictatorial faction in the wizarding world. So there is a purpose for her actions so that the last scene doesn’t seem like a random decision. I wish she had more screen time making extreme decisions, both good and bad, to really make this more obvious. As much as I see this being a valid choice for Queenie, I also see how it seems abrupt. You have four major points and they don’t necessarily lead to Grindelwald, but I think it is the most logical choice.
Wizards and Witches can;t get married to a No-Maj?
What? I know we established in the first one that MACUSA thinks backward about muggles and No-Majs, but the founder of Ilvermorny was not only married to a No-Maj, but had kids with him. And not only that, he helped her found the school, named a house, and helped make wands for the students. I’m just a little confused on this. Like why and when would have this even become a law? After the revolution, America had an existential crisis and needed to make a global, or at least Atlantic, identity. At this time is when the first Thanksgiving was used to establish the myth of American culture, as well as Pocohantus and John Smith? If the establishment of the No-Maj United States and MACUSA run along the same timeline I would assume this law would have been considered around the same time as making Thanksgiving and the Native Americans and the Pilgrims a part of the founding of America. Point being, if Isolt and James could get married and found the wizarding school in America, with statues of Isolt and James, I don’t see how this could be a law unless it is some forgotten history. It just seems like this story is an American Wizarding World equivalent of Thanksgiving and would be used to establish the American Wizarding World mythology the same way.
Alison has my favourite line.
I mean my worst line.
I mean I don’t know.
All I know is that when Queenie screams ‘Walk with me!’ to Jacob, with tears in her eyes, thinking that the only way she will ever ever be allowed to loved Jacob is by joining the darkest wizard of their age, touches my heart in places I didn’t even know existed…
Molly Weasley is ready to fight anyone anytime for anyreason
you can’t change my mind

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
so uh
queenie drugged the guy she was dating, took him to another continent, left him there with no knowledge of what had happened or means of getting home, then joined up with the people who’d much like to see him dead
and she’s still meant to be sympathetic to us
what the hell is this writing
I don’t think we’re meant to be sympathetic toward her, but be able to see where she is coming from. From what I understand of the story and her character, in general, is she is our window to see how Grindelwald got the following he did. For all intents and purposes, Grindelwald is, at this current time, the Wizarding World’s Hitler. To better explain, and I don’t think you’re stupid or need to be talked down to but I need to explain it this way so everyone can understand, the National Socialist Workers Party, or Nazi Party as we know it today, was meant to be inclusive, it was meant to attract a wide group of people that, at the end of the day, wanted war. It did not matter on who, but the Nazi party was unquestionably founded on the principle that war was needed to establish Germany’s power in Europe. After we see Grindelwald’s rally, we can clearly also see that at Grindelwald’s core, he just wants war. His argument is war for equality, war for superiority, war for power, and Queenie see this as a way out of the old norms of the inability to legally marry a No-Maj, and if that means siding with Grindelwald then that is what she is going to do. Now, I am in absolutely no way apologizing for her actions or siding with her actions, but do I understand where she is coming from? Yes, I do. Queenie has never been one to do things without going to the extreme and this is no exception. When she went to Paris she felt like she lost everyone she loved. Her sister is nowhere to be found, she left the love of her life in a different country, she is overwhelmed in a country where she doesn’t understand the language, the customs, and unable to block out all the voices in her head, so when someone offers her a helping hand and a way out, she takes it. In her mind, Grindelwald and his followers have been the only ones to accept what she wants indiscriminately. Tina, Newt, even Jacob had all been...not against her, but hesitant to help her with what she wants. Queenie’s motivation has been and always will be love. So do I feel sympathetic to Queenie, no I do not, she made very bad choices consistently, but do I understand where she is coming from, absolutely, and most importantly what I think her major purpose of this movie is that she is our window, because, without her, Grindelwald’s rise to power is hard to understand. We see that Grindelwald is in the habit of promising things to people, blanket promises to large groups, but specific individual promises to people like Credence, Queenie, and Leta. He finds their biggest weaknesses, Credence’s existential crisis, Queenie’s need to be able to love without consequences, and Leta’s want to be included and be separated from the labels society put on her as a Slytherin, a Lestrange, and the guilt she carries for killing her own brother. The only difference is Leta saw through the lies and faulty promises of Grindelwald and paid the price.