regarding the â#NotAllHistorians erase queer history and you tumblr rubes are just uneducated children who donât understand the Complexity of historyâ posts going around:
when your history has been and is still constantly erased under the guise of âwe canât know for sure [so it doesnât count], âwe canât apply modern terminology to the past,â and âtheyâre just friends,â itâs entirely reasonable not to trust or assume good faith from authorities who insist on using this type of language.
is that fair to the field of history? not really. but if you want to change that, punch UP instead of complaining about your queer students. cis & straight historians who teach especially need to remember this: you are in a position of power over vulnerable young people, and the full weight of an oppressive culture lies at your back, ready to crush them, and ready to bias you against people like them, even unconsciously. there is a reason that your students feel that no one is going to fight for them, and if you want them to trust you, you have to demonstrate that you are actually trustworthy.
history is not only (if it ever was) about the search for âobjectiveâ truth. it is highly political, and when you use the language of oppressors, you reinforce the dominant culture and will be considered its ally by both queer and non-queer people in lieu of other context.
(p.s.: many of the people who complain about queer erasure in academia are queer academics ourselves; donât assume that anyone you disagree with must be an amateur. i have no idea how some of you havenât encountered the conservative elements of your fieldâyouâre either very lucky, or you have encountered them, and are acting like they donât exist and arenât damaging to their students and public conceptions of history alike.)