Inflicting the products of my fixation on Snape, Occlumency, Voldemort, Death Eaters, and general angst on Tumblr. oh I guess I also blog a lot about Israel and Jew stuff now?
But Harryâs anger at Snape continued to pound through his veins like venom. Let go of his anger? He could as easily detach his legs. . . .
This is the first Occlumency lesson. Harry is right, of course. Feelings donât go away because you want them to. To let go of them when theyâve not been addressed or validated can be as hard as detaching a leg. And yet, itâs what Dumbledore asked Snape to do, and itâs what Snape had to do to survive the first war as Dumbledoreâs spy. You have to ask yourself⌠how?
Trapped animals chew off their own legs to escape. Itâs a sacrifice they make to survive.
If thereâs one thing in a fic that turns me off it, itâs the idea that Occlumency shields are a thing, that Severus was so gifted at it because heâs got some power like Second Sight or being a metamorphagus. I always preferred to think of Occlumency and Legilimency as skills that can be learned, even if some have more aptitude for it than others.
Severus entered Hogwarts with the kind of life experience that primed him for developing these skills, and left it with even more. Occlumency is magical dissociation, a post-traumatic coping mechanism, and Severus has C/PTSD. More under the cut; tw: just general angst.
To survive, he would have had to develop a knack for telling how explosive and unpredictable people feel. Over his life, he faced at least two egregious examples of what Pete Walker, author of âComplex PTSDâ calls âthe Charming Bullyâ.
Especially devolved fight types can become sociopathic. Sociopathy can range along a continuum that stretches from corrupt politician to vicious criminal. A particularly nasty sociopath, who I call the charming bully, probably falls somewhere around the middle of this continuum. The charming bully behaves in a friendly manner some of the time. He can even occasionally listen and be helpful in small amounts, but he still uses his contempt to overpower and control others. This type typically relies on scapegoats for the dumping of his vitriol. These unfortunate scapegoats are typically weaker than him. [âŚ] He generally spares his favorites from this behavior, unless they get out of line. If the charming bully is charismatic enough, those close to him will often fail to register the unconscionable meanness of his scapegoating. The bullyâs favorites often slip into denial, relieved that they are not the target. Especially charismatic bullies may even be admired and seen as great.
These would be James Potter and Tom Riddle, who are distantly related, I might add. Harry inherited the tendency to default to the fight response, but since he grew up the scapegoat and not the golden child, he never becomes quite as appalling, and after all, a fight response is normal when they are after you. Even so, Harry, who has both James and Voldemort inside him, triggers Severus to no end. Itâs not a coincidence that the memories Harry sees when he is with him are largely horrible, and vice versa. There had to be happy or at least neutral or even boring moments, but these two detest each other, and they know they detest each other. Negative emotions and associated memories are so close to the surface they canât be contained. This is the purpose of the Pensieve in this context - to contain the emotions. Since Severus knew what was in there when he pulled Harry out, my theory is that you donât suddenly forget the memories you placed there, but rather you make them less fraught with emotions.
âGet up!â said Snape sharply. âGet up! You are not trying, you are making no effort, you are allowing me access to memories you fear, handing me weapons!â
Harry stood up again, his heart thumping wildly as though he had really just seen Cedric dead in the graveyard. Snape looked paler than usual, and angrier, though not nearly as angry as Harry was. âI â am â making â an â effort,â he said through clenched teeth.
âI told you to empty yourself of emotion!â
âYeah? Well, Iâm finding that hard at the moment,â Harry snarled.
âThen you will find yourself easy prey for the Dark Lord!â said Snape savagely. âFools who wear their hearts proudly on their sleeves, who cannot control their emotions, who wallow in sad memories and allow themselves to be provoked this easily â weak people, in other words â they stand no chance against his powers! He will penetrate your mind with absurd ease, Potter!â
A lot to unpack here.
âMemories you fear,â âweaponsâ, âeasy preyâ.
Fearing your own memories, viewing your own lived experiences as weapons to be used against you, being easy prey⌠Severus could not be speaking louder of himself here. He is the one whose mind had been penetrated with absurd ease, he is the one who handed weapons to Voldemort, and he is the one who had to do the psychological equivalent of detaching his own leg â again and again â to survive.
Iâll argue that Severus developed a fawn response and a flight response, as fighting had never really worked out for him if it was possible at all. He had at least two more people Iâd describe as bullies in his life, Tobias and Lucius.
Again from Pete Walker:
These [fawn] response patterns are so deeply set in the psyche, that as adults, many codependents automatically respond to threat like dogs, symbolically rolling over on their backs, wagging their tails, hoping for a little mercy and an occasional scrap. Websterâs second entry for fawn is: âto show friendliness by licking hands, wagging its tail, etc.: said of a dog.â I find it tragic that some codependents are as loyal as dogs to even the worst âmastersâ.
Remember what Sirius called him? Luciusâs lapdog. Bellatrix called him Dumbledoreâs pet, Dumbledore said he dangles on Voldemortâs arm, the narrative compares Snape to a rabbit in SWM and Harry compares the Half Blood Prince to a beloved pet who had gone feral (yes, this does mean a lot to me on a personal level, yes my username is not a coincidence).
His unconscious fawn response might have been his undoing, drawn as he was to figures like Lucius and Voldemort. As an adult, I think he utilized the skills he had developed to survive in order to stitch these people up, and involuntary dissociation and fawning became Occlumency, which to me, is his signature magic. Harry needed only to banish Voldemort from his mind; Severus could not settle for this. He had to give Voldemort something, and knowing how to fawn meant knowing what to give him and how to draw himself in such a light that Voldemort would believe it. We see how he wanted to be seen by the Death Eaters: a self-serving coward who sought to hide behind Dumbledoreâs apron, playing his pet. But thatâs Pettigrew, not Snape. Imagine the self-immolation, the self-violation, it must have taken to convince everyone that youâre an ersatz Wormtail! Snape is a man and a prince, and the text recognizes this as Harry calls him, in the end, Dumbledoreâs man, the bravest man, and as that chapter is called âThe Princeâs Taleâ. Voldemort thought Snape was nothing more than a âgood and faithful servant,â and that his last words were âMy Lordâ.
But Severus had an unequaled gift for Occlumency, specifically against Voldemort, because Voldemort could not legilimens what he couldnât feel; and he couldnât feel love, grief, guilt, and remorse. This was Severusâs secret weapon, which would not have worked against Harry - who can feel these things, and who is also Lilyâs son. I can prove it. The first time Harry gets the hang of Occlumency is after Dobby dies:
His scar burned, but he was master of the pain; he felt it, yet was apart from it. He had learned control at last, learned to shut his mind to Voldemort, the very thing Dumbledore had wanted him to learn from Snape. Just as Voldemort had not been able to possess Harry while Harry was consumed with grief for Sirius, so his thoughts could not penetrate Harry now, while he mourned Dobby. Grief, it seemed, drove Voldemort out . . . though Dumbledore, of course, would have said that it was love. . . .
Harry learned to dissociate, though fortunately in a healthier way than many of us ever get to.
Of course, Snape was a good and faithful servant⌠to Dumbledore, which brings us to the flight response. The chapter wherein he escapes after killing Dumbledore is called âFlight of the Princeâ. He should be fighting, he had just proven that he can cast a killing curse, and yet he flees. He can literally fly, in fact: He, Lily, and Voldemort are the only ones we see pulling this off.
As a child, we see this too: He copes with his home situation by reminding himself âit wonât be long and Iâll be gone.â He is thrilled when he imagines Hogwarts, his escape; he follows Lily out of the carriage instead of confronting James and Sirius head-on (which might have saved them all a lot of pain eventually). But this doesnât work out, we see that in terrifying detail. The next attempt at an escape is joining the Death Eaters, but this too doesnât work out.
He canât flee anymore.
âSeverus, you cannot pretend this isnât happening!â Karkaroffâs voice sounded anxious and hushed, as though keen not to be overheard. âItâs been getting clearer and clearer for months. I am becoming seriously concerned, I canât deny it ââ
âThen flee,â said Snapeâs voice curtly. âFlee â I will make your excuses. I, however, am remaining at Hogwarts.â
Shortly thereafter:
âSeverus,â said Dumbledore, turning to Snape, âyou know what I must ask you to do. If you are ready . . . if you are prepared . . .â
âI am,â said Snape.
He looked slightly paler than usual, and his cold, black eyes glittered strangely.
He was ready, and he was prepared. He didnât fly; he walked toward what might well have been his end with open eyes, armed only with the strength of his mind. Before Voldemort killed him, he looked pale, again, and terrified.
âI sought a third wand, Severus. The Elder Wand, the Wand of Destiny, the Deathstick. I took it from its previous master. I took it from the grave of Albus Dumbledore.â
And now Snape looked at Voldemort, and Snapeâs face was like a death mask. It was marble white and so still that when he spoke, it was a shock to see that anyone lived behind the blank eyes.
I ask myself if this was the moment he realized he had been betrayed, that by giving Dumbledore a painless death he had secured his own. Maybe he wasnât pale because he was scared; maybe he was pale because he was shocked. He was at his absolute limit, Occluding with all his might when he could have easily saved himself. The dam is about to break. All the memories he feared, all the weapons, the entire content of his heart is about to spill through - literally.
He fawned for Voldemort, the worst of all possible masters, but in the end, he was Voldemortâs undoing. All the ways in which he was weak and powerless against Tobias, James, Lucius, et al., proved to be part of goodness and source of his power. It doesnât surprise me in the least that Snape is so loved. Iâve never actually seen such love for any other fictional character. He represents a kind of courage that many of us need to get by, lest we simply become evil or give the fuck up (âI wish I was deadâ). A kind of courage rarely celebrated. The more time Iâve spent in the fandom in general and in the Snapedom in particular, the more I am convinced of this.
Reblog to add: we only see Draco occlude, but at a very traumatic time in his life when he is about to break (and does), and his teacher is Bella, who survived Azkaban. I always believed some form of Occlumency is what Severus was talking about as a better way to resist dementors, and I think Sirius used something similar too, perhaps unconsciously, by obsessing over his own innocence, thus surviving the place as well. (Thanks @dementedlollipop for the insight here)
Not to make too fine of a point of it, but I wonder how much of a fawn response we see in the relationship between Severus and Lily, and in the hilltop conversation with Dumbledore, where he shrinks at Dumbledore's disapproval and immediately promises to give anything. This is why it really is a stellar character moment when he actually resists and argues with Dumbledore, and disobeys him. He wasn't just a follower, and had his own code.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
After 3 months of my internet being cut off by IRGC, 2 days ago I finally came online and I've been crying since for my people, for them having their simplest of rights being taken away from them.
These past 3 months so many innocent people got executed for the reason of them being against this Islamic regim (IRGC), and in any case you haven't heard, more than 43,000 people got killed in only 2 days :) and rarely anybody talked about them. And since those days more people have been killed, raped and tortured for speaking up about the truth of IRGC. No, the majority of Iranians don't want this regim, we are barely surviving under this dictatorship as human beings (you can't imagine how hard it is for people in the minority groups). Also about the tragedy of Minab's school, even the cause of that was this regim for we, Iranians, are grieving their death. Death to this regim.
It is so cruel that my people get to live like this. When I came online and I saw so many updates from my favorite games and fandoms I felt like I couldn't breath, for I wanted to live a normal life, my people want the same but here we are trying out different VPNs to see which one works.
Even with our internet back, we won't stop talking about the evil actions (and evil existence) of Iran's Islamic regim.
no country where it's legal to hit children should be allowed input on anything internationally. the UN, WHO, World Bank, whatever should be allowed to just go "interesting opinion but you think 'they're small' is a reason not to protect someone from assault so overruled"
no country where it's legal to hit children should be allowed input on anything internationally. the UN, WHO, World Bank, whatever should be allowed to just go "interesting opinion but you think 'they're small' is a reason not to protect someone from assault so overruled"
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
so hard to be sex positive in a "women and even men should be able to healthily masturbate and enjoy physical pleasure" kinda way while also being very very anti sex industry is hard sometimes.
Ahh but porn has always existed!! Look at cave paintings! Okay. Masturbate to cave paintings. I really want you to masturbate to cave paintings. If it's the same thing, you should have no issues masturbating to cave paintings. I'm dead serious when I say I have no issues with anybody masturbating to cave paintings, or even written smut or anything that doesn't rely on the rape of real people and profiting off of it. I'd be fine with hentai if so much of it didn't try to up the shock factor as much as possible to get people hooked on various fetishes.
People have masturbated forever, and they didn't need HD violent videos to do so. You can do it with your mind, or a nice lil story, I promise. Make your own horny cave painting, idgaf
This is exactly the distinction that gets lost in the "discourse." Being anti-industry isn't about being anti-pleasure or anti-human nature; itâs about being anti-commodity.
âThe "itâs always existed" argument is such a lazy reach. There is a massive structural chasm between a cave painting and a multi-billion dollar tech industry that uses predatory algorithms to keep people scrolling through increasingly extreme content. One is a human expression; the other is a profit-driven machine that relies on the financial desperation of real people.
âYou can be 100% in favor of people having healthy, liberated sex lives while still recognizing that a massive, unregulated industry built on the extraction of labor from vulnerable populations is a net negative for society.
Promoting imagination or ethical, non-human-based media isn't "puritanical" it's just asking for a world where someone's survival isn't tied to being recorded for a stranger's subscription fee.
Let us be clear, sweetie: Severus Snape is not some angry little man on a forum crying because no witch would date him. No, no. Severus Snape is a man who once held love in his hand, fumbled itâdropped itâand then decided he should never touch anything that delicate, again.
He didnât become celibate out of bitterness. He became celibate out of penance. The man took his heartbreak and turned it into a lifelong funeral march with no coffin, no flowers, just black robes and regret.
You think he couldnât find someone else? Please. Heâs tall, mysterious, clearly got cheekbones sculpted by rage and repression. He could absolutely ruin the right personâin the best way. But does he flirt? Does he date? No, darling. He broods. With purpose.
Because Severus Snape isnât single. Heâs emotionally widowed. Lily Evans didnât just dieâshe became the ghost he takes to bed every night. And he? He became her silent mourner, carried grief like someone who never got the chance to be anything to her. Never kissed her. Never claimed her. But oh, he remembers her like a vow.
This man wears grief like couture.
No one else gets close. Not because theyâre unworthyâbut because he refuses to let himself be chosen again. Itâs giving martyrdom. Itâs giving âI could destroy you with how much I feel but I wonât.â Itâs giving âtouch me and I might unravel in front of the tapestry.â
He doesnât need pity. He needs a mirror that tells him, âShe never loved you. But you loved her. And you helped seal her fate.
It wasnât rejection that broke youâit was living with the belief that you had no right to be loved after what it cost.â
But until that day?
Snape remains the widow of the living.
Alone. Unkissed. Unhealed.
And absolutely unforgettable.
â
Related Post: The Virgin Theory: Severus Snape, and the Sanctity of Unlived Intimacy
"Opposing genocide isn't antisemitic," while technically being a true statement, implies that you have said "I oppose genocide" to which Jews have said "That is antisemitic." It is making a link between Jewish concern about antisemitism and support for genocide. Regardless of whether you think Israel's conduct in the Gaza Strip meets the threshold for genocide, you are implicitly encouraging your peers to connect Jews/Judaism with genocide. So, antisemitic
Labeling a war - rife with war crimes as this one might have been - a genocide, despite the fact that the population in question is now roughly the same size as before the so-called genocide - is not "opposing genocide". If it has any effect on genocides, it's in that it distracts from them.
If not antisemitism, then I have no idea what could motivate such behavior, and I don't care. Also, a willingness to accept negative claims about Group X without criticism is a form of prejudice, and dismissal of concerns about how such claims might affect members of said group is also a form of prejudice. The commonly accepted term for anti-Jewish prejudice is "antisemitism," and if the shoe fits, wear it.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Youâre watching a YouTuber that discusses online radicalization, at some point they get radicalized in the opposite direction. You sigh and move on. Youâre watching a YouTuber that discusses online radicalization. At some point they get radicalized in the opposite direction. They show no self awareness that this has happened. You move on. Youâre watching a YouTuber that discusses online radicalization. They have excellent insight into how distrust and misinformation lead to conspiratorial thinking and how the internet as we know it today is designed to feed these impulses. At some point they get radicalized themselves. Youâre watching a YouTuber.
In his last video on Creationism, he went on this lovely little rant:
"Religious fanaticism is such a driving force of like, all of the big, terrible words, you know? Like we're literally watching it right fucking now. I don't know what are we on? Are we on year fucking like 80 of, you know, genocide in Palestine? Are they doing that because of fucking evolution? No, it's not because of the faith. It's because they're a fucking evil empire, dude. Do you think the conquistadors did it because they were Christian? They thought they were doing it because they were Christian, but it was because there was an evil empire telling them that those people were the fucking savages. So they sent them to fucking do horrible shit. And then they did the horrible shit."
So my take is that this will always happen when people make their living as commentators and opinion makers, online, where they need to come up with something new to say far too often to know what they're talking about, and where audience capture will invariably get to them.
When people get paid to do an activity, one day the pressure will be on to do that activity when funds are tight (they're always tight). This is true of "developing opinions" and of "sex work" and of all of it.
And we download our opinions wholesale from these people. And this is exactly what the discourse looks like. I sincerely think it's better to not have Opinions About Things than to get ours from people who monetize theirs, with no disrespect to content creators, who are ultimately doing their job to the best of their ability.
severus had a choice. yes, he deserves sympathy and yes, i hate regulus black, barty crouch jr and evan rosier- im not defending him. but severus could have fled britain or lived as a muggle or just not joined??
The thing with snape is that he had no support system in the muggle world nor the wizarding world, and any value the pure-bloods saw in him cuz of his genius was post probably lost after he got flashed and humiliated in front the whole school, I say he doesnât have a choice because the choice was social suicide and being in poverty or joining a cult, one which excepted him and actually saw potential in him.
I doubt he had the money to go anywhere outside Britain, and while going to the muggle world might work it also means he has to hide his magic-the one thing in his life that actually makes him happy, having to throw away the one thing in life that actually gives you any power is hardly a choice
That anon is probably too far gone down the anti Snape pipeline at this point. "Just flee the country durr"
Yeah it would've been better for Snape to do that. It's so easy for people like anon and me to say that. I have no kids (tbf neither did Snape), no debts, no rich older men grooming me, no cult with its hooks in me, no shattered sense of self, no former best friend who left me and I feel crushed by guilt about it, no dreams of fixing the above by becoming awesome and powerful, no being stuck in the mindset that being awesome and powerful will somehow solve my life.
I can liquidate my pocket money grade savings and fuck off to parts unknown whenever I want, because I've got all these nifty things called privileges that Snape never had.
When we talk about Occlumency lessons and the memories Snape deposits in the Pensieve, I think most people (myself included) assume that Snape only puts three memories in there. But what if he puts three sets of memories in? As in, each strand of memory he pulls away contains a cluster of memories around a particular subject or train of thought.
Here how itâs described in the book:
Snape pulled out his wand from an inside pocket of his robes and Harry tensed in his chair, but Snape merely raised the wand to his temple and placed its tip into the greasy roots of his hair. When he withdrew it, some silvery substance came away, stretching from temple to wand like a thick gossamer strand, which broke as he pulled the wand away from it and fell gracefully into the Pensieve, where it swirled silvery-white, neither gas nor liquid. Twice more, Snape raised the wand to his temple and deposited the silvery substance into the stone basin, then, without offering any explanation of his behaviour, he picked up the Pensieve carefully, removed it to a shelf out of their way and returned to face Harry with his wand held at the ready.
-Order of the Phoenix, Ch. 24
Snape extracts three strands of memory, but we donât know what they contain. Theyâre described only as a âsilvery substance⌠stretching from temple to wand like a thick gossamer strand.â In comparison, hereâs how the memories Snape gives to harry at the end of DH are described:
Something more than blood was leaking from Snape. Silvery blue, neither gas nor liquid, it gushed from his mouth and his ears and his eyes, and Harry knew what it was, but did not know what to do - A flask, conjured from thin air, was thrust into his shaking hands by Hermione. Harry lifted the silvery substance into it with his wand.
-Deathly Hallows, Ch. 32
Again, the memories are described as a silvery substance. Thereâs no mention of it coming out in bits and pieces, as if separate memories came out individually, but as a single amorphous substance which can be deposited into a flask by lifting it and placing it inside.
The stone Pensieve lay in the cabinet where it had always been: Harry heaved it on to the desk and poured Snapeâs memories into the wide basin with its runic markings around the edge.
-Deathly Hallows, Ch. 33
Here too, where Harry empty those memories into the Pensieve, they seem to be described as a single substance â we know that the flask Harry empties held numerous memories from Snape in it, but they donât seem to be separated in any way. Theyâre extracted, bottled, and put into the pensieve in the same way a single strand of memory would be. It seems very possible that Snape could have pulled away a single strand of that non-gas, non-liquid substance at the start of Occlumency lessons, yet it contained numerous memories instead of just one.
The way extracting and storing memories seems to be complex. In Half-Blood Prince, Dumbledore has the memories heâs collected stored and organized in individual crystal bottles. This implies that memories can be extracted both one at a time and also en masse, the way thoughts work - sometimes we think of a single experience, and sometimes we go through multiple memories simultaneously, jumping back and forth between each one. The Pensieve also holds multiple memories simultaneously, as we see in Goblet of Fire when Harry first falls into it and experiences several of Dumbledoreâs memories. Those memories all follow the same theme - various Death Eater hearings after Voldemortâs fall.
While itâs implied that the Pensieve shows memories in chronological order, we donât know if a person viewing them is necessarily seeing the earliest one in a set. Itâs possible that a practiced Pensieve user, or one who enters the Pensieve with deliberate intent to view a series of memories, is more likely to view those memories starting with the earliest one. When Harry went into the Pensieve and saw Dumbledoreâs memories in Goblet of Fire, he was cautious and curious. We nevertheless have no way of knowing if there were earlier memories he didnât see, or even if those memories were chronological order, but they seem to be. In contrast, when he goes into the Pensieve in OotP to view Snapeâs memories, heâs being reckless and thoughtless. â heâs just had a fight with Cho, heâs been angry for months, and he takes it out on Snape by invading his privacy. Itâs very possible that this attitude and approach to someone elseâs memories affects how theyâre viewed, and that he drops into the middle of a series of thoughts and SWM is just where he happens to land. Maybe itâs exactly because he feels this way that he does, because his own feelings of frustration and rejection connect with those in Snapeâs memory.
Itâs also possible that the order memories can be viewed in is determined by how theyâre extracted and saved â in which case, if Snape was just dumping groups of memories into the Pensieve during Occlumency lessons, their order may not have been chronological, or there may not have been any order to them at all, as opposed to when he gave Harry the memories that we see in the Princeâs Tale, which may have been in chronological order because his life was flashing before his eyes as he was dying. Therefore itâs also possible that Harry dropped into SWM in OotP because Snape extracted a group of memories and the most triggering one was at the forefront. But if Harry hadnât been interrupted, perhaps the memory would have shifted into other ones of Lily - Snapeâs apology to her, their childhood memories, etc.
There seem to be multiple possibilities for how extracting memories and viewing them in a Pensieve works. When Harry sees Snapeâs memories in The Princeâs Tale he sees the same one he saw in Snapeâs Worst Memory. Itâs possible that when he first sees it in OotP he just happens to fall into that part of a longer timeline of memories, or that he falls into a cluster of memories of which that is the most prominent one. All we know is that Snape put at least three memories into the Pensieve, but Harry saw this particular one. Itâs possible that it wasnât just three memories Snape put in there but three sets of memories. If thatâs the case, itâs also likely that these sets are organized differently than what we see in The Princeâs Tale. If his motivation in extracting memories was to hide them from Harry in OotP (and by proxy, from Voldemort), and if in that moment he was in a measured and controlled emotional state, it would affect his choice of what memories to share. Perhaps these are a more robust set focused entirely on Lily, and presumably other areas of his life he doesnât want Harry to have access to, whereas the set of memories he gives Harry in DH are about conveying Dumbledoreâs message that Harry has to die and giving it context (to which Snape and Lilyâs friendship is integral).
Obviously this is all conjecture and there isnât much textual evidence to go on. Memories and the Pensieve have been a grey area of canon at best. Nevertheless I find the idea very compelling, that if Snape could hand over a whole series of memories as one unit in DH, it should be possible to extract them in groups as well as individual ones. In which case the question isnât what specific memories other than SWM did Snape put in the Pensieve during Occlumency lessons, but what sets of memories? SWM may have belonged to a larger set of memories of Lily. Perhaps the other two sets have to do with his history as a Death Eater and might include his work as a spy, and his memories of childhood abuse that are personal and make him feel vulnerable? All Harry sees when he breaks into Snapeâs mind is his father shouting at his mother. The extra-textual information given on Pottermore and approved by the author (boo,hiss) says that Snapeâs father used to beat him with a belt⌠if Harry broke into his mind and saw the most vivid memories, would they be of Snapeâs father shouting or of him being whipped? Wouldnât it be the latter? Unless⌠it wasnât accessible because it had been put in the Pensieve for safekeeping.
Itâs possible itâs groups of memories, and an interesting idea, but I still think based on the evidence we have, itâs likely three distinct individual memories. Because Snape isnât the only person we see extract their memories in canon; Slughorn does too.
Then, very slowly, Slughorn put his hand in his pocket and pulled out his wand. He put his other hand inside his cloak and took out a small, empty bottle. Still looking into Harryâs eyes, Slughorn touched the tip of his wand to his temple and withdrew it, so that a long, silver thread of memory came away too, clinging to the wand tip. Longer and longer the memory stretched until it broke and swung, silvery bright, from the wand. Slughorn lowered it into the bottle where it coiled, then spread, swirling like gas. He corked the bottle with a trembling hand and then passed it across the table to Harry.
Itâs described very similarly to how Snape removes his memories in OotP, in that itâs a long silvery strand. But unlike with Snapeâs, we know that Slughorn only gives Harry one memoryâthe one of him telling Tom about Horcruxesâbecause we view it shortly after.
Also, just the fact Snape pulled out three distinct strands. If one can pull out groups of memories at a time, and the only purpose of removing them was presumably to reduce the chance of Harry seeing them, why not just remove them all at once in a group instead of three times? It would be more efficient.
In DH when Snape is dying, my impression was theyâre coming out all together in one mass because heâs doing it with more desperate, instinctual magic instead of deliberately with his wandâlike heâs literally bleeding his memories as he dies, not really consciously selecting them. Itâs the only time we see groups of memories like this; the rest are all distinct, singular memories.
Sadly we get no evidence from Dumbledoreâs memories in HPB, which are oddly kept in bottles instead of him just pulling them out of his head at the time, as it might have given us more insight into the way they work (and I donât understand why heâd go to the trouble of bottling them up in the first place. Iâd say he was worried about dying before showing them to Harry, but he showed zero urgency about meeting with Harry in HPB, waiting several weeks between the first and second appointments. AnywayâŚ).
The biggest question to me has always been why Snape removed the memories in the first place, besides needing to for plot reasons, because from all three characters, we can see removing a memory doesnât make you forget it. Snape knows to be pissed about what Harry saw; Slughorn laments what Harry will see after removing the memory; and Dumbledore knows what memories are in the bottles well enough to talk about them. Definitely a very large grey area!
Good point, I forgot about Slughorn! Though itâs interesting that his memory is described as long, while Snapeâs is described as thick. I think Slughornâs is long because heâs hesitant and barely willing, but thereâs no description beyond that. Snapeâs memory is described as a thick strand, and that he repeated the act, which implies all three strands he pulls from his head are thick. Itâs possible this insinuates multiple memories grouped together, and itâs also possible the implication is that what he pulls from his head is more substantial and leaves less behind so itâs harder for anyone to get at it should they invade his mind.
*We may be reading way too much into something that the author might not have thought through all that much, but Iâve got to get my kicks somehow, I donât know about you.*
Re: your point about Dumbledore, one of the reasons he keeps the memories in individual bottles is that they arenât all his. He tells Harry that he got them from various sources - one of them is from Ogden, the Ministry official who visited the Gaunts, one is from Morfin himself, and one is from the house elf of that witch Voldemort takes Hufflepuffâs cup from. Dumbledore is thorough, and instead of relying on his own memory of conversations with these people, he gets their firsthand memory - on several occasions through great effort, because Voldemort went to such lengths to modify their memories. Something Iâve always wondered about is whether itâs possible to place someone elseâs memory into your own head, the way we see these wizards do when they place their own memories back in.
Re: your point about Snape and why he removes the memories, Iâve always wondered if this was sloppy writing, or if the magic around memories is more varied than we see elsewhere. Or maybe itâs unique to Snape⌠heâs one of the best legilimens in the books if not the best, since heâs able to fool Voldemort completely. Itâs possible heâs figured out a way to extract memories that diminishes their presence in oneâs mind, or maybe itâs easier to compartmentalize and close oneâs mind to protect certain thoughts if theyâve also been extracted. The language used in the books is âextractâ not âcopyâ which implies that even if something is left behind, it might be diminished or partial. Then again, the memories are described similarly to ghosts - white and physical but not tangible. So maybe the extracted memories are imprints, like ghosts are.
I do still like the theory that the reason Snape extracts memories three times, even if theyâre clusters and not individual memories, is because the process of extracting them and the way the pensieve works reflect how thoughts work in a personâs brain. Some people can only entertain a single thought, while others are able to mentally multi-task. Even most people who can do the latter canât think disparate thoughts easily, though. What I mean is, if you think about your childhood besty you can remember a bunch of things about them in quick succession, but youâd have a hard time mixing in memories of the job you had in your mid-20s or what you cooked for dinner every night last week simultaneously. However, if you werenât thinking about something else you could probably rifle through various memories of that job even if it spanned several years, or you can probably easily think through dinner last week in one go, itâs just harder to do both at the same time. Itâs not hard to group memories like that for most people, but if you had to concentrate on all three kinds at once it would take a lot more energy and focus. It can potentially be done, but why would you try, when itâs so much easier to go categorically, the way the brain works?
Finished the fic about Sev's second summer break!!!!
https://archiveofourown.org/works/31885153
I just looked, and I've been at it very intermittently since 2021. Whew! Fleshing out and exploring (one version of how) the Princes, the Snape family, Cokeworth, and a whole bunch of other factors might have shaped history never got simple, but it never got boring either - I hope reading it will be as enjoyable (?) as writing it. Eeep!
Are we talking about the same fucking guy?? Like Snape as in Severus Tobias Snape???????????? This dude was doing fucking OVERTIME protecting harry from corrupt fucking adults either attempting to harm or manipulate him why the fuck would he of all people take advantage of him like that
if someone so as much as STARED at harry in a creepy way, girl version or not, and snape was presentâŚthat pdf would be fucking OBLITERATED, SILENCED, TORN APART, RAVAGED!!!!!! he would literally torture that dude????? if they even thought about trying something in his vicinity or not snape would be there with a fucking battle axe đŤŠ
the dude was literally putting his life on the line for him and if you donât think heâd absolutely massacre some offender over him then your crazy..even crazier if you think heâd be the one doing such a thing
âbbbbb-but he liked his momđĽşâ Who the fuck came up with the logic that if you like someone romantically then youâll turn into a predator??? actually fucking braindead and such a disgusting, pathetic, HARMFUL, and biased claim to make like how does one come to this conclusion
NO PROOF THAT HED EVER BE SO FUCKING DISGUSTING!! NONE!!!!
i feel like this should go unsaid like???
and this also extends to the rest of his students too. like yeah he may be an asshole but if some offender tried some shit with ANY of them theyâd meet a very painful fate. Like those are HIS STUDENTS. HIS KIDS. fuck are you talking about???đđđđ Yeah he was a bully for a teacher but he always showed up when they were in danger, heâd be the last person to harm them like that????????
anyways hereâs high cortisol snape making sure his bumass kids donât die of hypothermia!! fav scene from this game no i havenât played it for longer than ten minutes
âmy dad thinks my mom is hot so he must be sexually interested in meâ <- does putting it that way show you how stupid this is???
and YES. My guy loves his students. Heâs always pissed at them because theyâre in his classroom messing around with stuff that could ACTUALLY KILL THEM. But we see time and time again in the books that heâs more than willing to put his life on the line for the kids heâs in charge of.
I have no doubt that Snape would commit great violence if a predator was around. Like even if he WAS an asshole that hated his students through and through, most adults are naturally inclined to attack those who hurt kids. Like the meanest, nastiest adult would still probably beat a predator to a pulp if they caught them touching kids.
so even if Snape truly was just The Worst, I still find it hard to believe he wouldnât break somebodyâs teeth over something like this. Even the thought of someone hurting kids like that is enough to make someone who is in a perpetual state of irritation and mild anger over said kids want to protect them. Itâs practically instinctual.
As for the Hogwarts Mystery screengrab omgggg I love that game. I picked Slytherin just because I knew that would mean could possibly get scenes with Snape being just my head of house. I needed to see him in his natural state. And itâs great. I canât wait to get to this scene. I have so many screenshots
OH MY GOD YOURE SO RIGHT ABOUT THE FREUD SHIT?? like genuinely you have to be just as deranged to come to such a conclusion about snapes character.
the second thing you wrote reminded me of that one fanart where snapes pinching harryâs ear and telling him off for almost dying like eight hundred times.
snape would be set to azkaban for what heâs to to a fucking pred if they were in the vicinity of any of his damn students. I agree with you, hating child predators is like one of the only thing *most* of humanity can unite over. I donât gaf how ugly snape can be, you WILL catch him with a wand in hand if such a dangerous person was present.
i love scavenging the internet for snape centered hogwarts mystery screenshots. âitâs coldâ ââŚobviouslyâ SNAPE 𫩠FUCKING CHUD I LOVE THIS BUM TEACHER IDC HES SO FUCKING FUNNY THAT CUNT
Harry is already a boy who looks like the boy who sexually humiliated Snape. If Snape had the inclination, well, he already had the motive to take advantage of Harry or hurt him in that way.
Basically people enjoy triggering real life victims of real life abuse for the sake of a point they made up and has no basis whatever.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I started using Head and Shoulders ten years ago for itchy scalp and dandruff, and then for ten years I have not had itchy scalp and dandruff, so I thought âwhy do I still buy shampoo to combat itchy scalp and dandruff when I do not have itchy scalp and dandruff,â so I stopped buying the shampoo for itchy scalp and dandruff and can you guess I have now? Can you predict what currently afflicts me? Itâs alright if you canât because apparently I fuckin couldnât either
Cutting something out of your life because you think you donât need it any more only to realize that it was in fact working as intended and preventing a problem that will return should you stop doing this is a good experiment to run periodically with something small like dandruff shampoo, lest you start to think it would be a good idea to do this with like letâs say public health and the social safety net and vaccines
I had a liver transplant when I was 14 and like six months later I was chatting with my surgeon and he said âthereâs gonna come a time, probably when youâre a teenager, where youâre gonna think, âI feel great, why am I still taking all this medication? I havenât needed it in years.â and youâre gonna want to stop taking all this medication. Guess whatâs gonna happen then? Youâre gonna go into rejection and your liver is gonna start failing, and youâre gonna be dying again, and weâre gonna have to find you another liver. So donât do that.â And I said âwhy the fuck would anyone do that?â and he said âpeople are stupid.â
every once in a while when I get annoyed by a pharmacy or donât wanna get out of bed to do my drugs I think âugh, this is dumb, why do I do this?â and that conversation slams into me like a truck and I remember that I am, in fact, stupid
Compulsive repetition and cycle-breaking - the importance of Albus Severus Potter, or: Harry's last and greatest protector
There is a lot of trauma to go around in HP, and tragically (and realistically), it keeps happening.
Harry is repeatedly orphaned, first from his parents, then from Sirius and Dumbledore - his actual appointed parent figure if anything should happen to his parents, and Harry's "last, greatest protector" according to his narration of the funeral.
Dumbledore's formative trauma is his role in his sister's death thanks to dabbling in Dark magic and the subsequent cover-up, and within his attempt to pay his karmic debt and stop another Dark wizard from taking over, he finds himself endangering god knows how many children under his care: Snape nearly died as a student, and many of the children he watched grow up and then recruited into the OOTP died as well. The seemingly incongruent triumphant look in his eyes when Harry tells him about the blood Voldemort took might be the moment his own pattern breaks for the first time - he is still fighting for the Greater Good, but thanks to his machinations over the years, he had given Harry a chance to survive his part in Dumbledore's crusade. I think this arc concludes when he fights for Draco's soul unto death - it serves a strategic purpose to cement Snape's position, yes, but also, he died having saved a child in his care from the fate that had tormented Dumbledore himself even after an actual century.
Snape's traumas are many, but the formative one is catalyzing Lily's death. He then finds himself - again, but worse this time - forced to push the trigger on his only friend's death. The pain this causes him is evident - he wails like a wounded animal in the immediate aftermath and even risks going to Sirius's house to find something that would keep him going.
I'd like to propose that Snape might have known that Harry's best chance at survival - i.e. Snape's best chance at redemption - would be Harry's Lily-like self-sacrificing act.
Pensieve memories are unfalsifiable, but there might have been an element of choice in when to end them, and it's possible Snape always knew he would have to use a Pensieve to persuade Harry to believe him. The conversation that ends in "Always" couldn't actually have ended like that, because nothing is actually resolved: Dumbledore does not convince Snape that Voldemort's defeat is more important than Harry's survival. The height of the conflict between Snape and Dumbledore is the least natural point to end the scene. Tellingly, Dumbledore's eyes are closed throughout the entire explanation of Harry's supposed ultimate fate. Snape and Dumbledore were both legilimenses, and legilimency requires eye contact. I strongly believe closed eyes, then, indicate "there's more".
âPrecisely. If there comes a time when Lord Voldemort stops sending that snake forth to do his bidding, but keeps it safe beside him under magical protection, then, I think, it will be safe to tell Harry.â
âTell him what?â
Dumbledore took a deep breath and closed his eyes.
This is followed by the explanation, including the dialogue:
âSo the boy . . . the boy must die?â asked Snape quite calmly. âAnd Voldemort himself must do it, Severus. That is essential.â
So: Harry must know why he is dying, and it must be done by Voldemort's hand. Harry must also find out, and then sacrifice himself, at a very specific moment. If the only important thing is "dead Harry," this could easily be achieved. The specifics are essential.
Dumbledore opened his eyes. Snape looked horrified.
Snape's admonishment, and the "Always" exchange, follow.
After this conversation occurs, Snape kills Dumbledore, and immediately after that he duels Harry and does not let him come to harm, saying "Potter belongs to the Dark Lord".
In Dark Lord Ascending, we see that Snape made sure Voldemort would know he alone must kill Harry. I posit that it was not merely Voldemort's ego, as he could have sent anyone (and indeed he used Narcissa as a human shield to make sure Harry was truly dead). He is uniquely bad at killing Harry. Yet he says:
"But I know better now. I understand those things that I did not understand before. I must be the one to kill Harry Potter, and I shall be."
This must have come from Dumbledore's spy, then sitting beside Voldemort as his most valuable servant.
Snape is still capable of producing the Doe Patronus, which represents Lily, and he is still serving Dumbledore despite having been used by him for years at that point.
It might mean that Snape understood that his personal quest for redemption is not as important as the entire world, but this insight is already served by his choice to die, sending Voldemort to battle with a wand that won't answer to him.
And anyway, if Harry must die, why is it so important that he sacrifice himself willingly? Why is it so important that Voldemort himself do it? A final confrontation between Harry and Voldemort or one of his cronies would have happened at some point, and Harry would have died, and Voldemort's last vestige would have died with him. Snape was not a stupid man, and not an unquestioning follower. The idea that this is actually rather a strange thing for Dumbledore to insist on must have occurred to him at some point. The self-sacrifice element was Harry's chance to come back, and this was why giving Harry the memories was imperative. Presumably, this knowledge also made it worthwhile to Snape to explain himself and his actions as thoroughly as he had, because really - only a couple of the memories he gave Harry are strategically important.
Snape dies because of the prophecy he had delivered. Lord Voldermort says:
"It cannot be any other way,â said Voldemort.
"I must master the wand, Severus. Master the wand, and I master Potter at last."
Snape is why Voldemort is interested in Harry, and he dies for this, and because of this. Voldemort thinks he is due to win at any moment.
But Harry - Harry, who had spared Peter Pettigrew, who had by then amassed so many tragic deaths - can feel pity and mercy, even for Snape. In the shrieking shack, where Harry had proved his mettle once before, Snape is slowly dying and Harry shows his compassion to him, the compassion Snape must have missed so much, lacked so painfully. He gets to look into Lily's eyes knowing that perhaps he might not have failed her.
He dies redeemed, even - especially - to the boy who was his main victim. Snape had both orphaned him and mistreated him as a student, but he was Harry's true latest and greatest protector. His pattern is broken, his trauma is resolved, and Lily's sacrifice is not wasted.
And Harry understands him. Snape's main victim reveres him, symbolically makes Snape a member of his family who is worthy to be mentioned in the same breath as Dumbledore. Harry's cycle is broken in that he has his own family, he commemorates his dead, and he forgives and understands even the man he had once hated as much as he did Voldemort himself. In Harry, Snape and Dumbledore broke their patterns, and in forgiving them and understanding he has always had protectors, imperfect as they were, Harry breaks his own. That is the true end, why the epilogue works, and the way to get from repeated loss and trauma to "all is well."