Ed Schraederâs Music Beat
Ed Schraederâs Music Beat are Ed Schraeder and Devlin Rice: two friendly, funny dudes who make serious music in Baltimore, MD. I first saw them at a First Unitarian Church show in Philadelphia a few years ago, but when I heard their most recent album, Riddles (recorded with Dan Deacon), and caught their set at Hopscotch I was more than a little impressed at how much their sound had evolved and expanded: this set of songs boasts jocund jams; jagged, juddering jazz; and other jaunty jewels. I caught up with them in Charlotte, NC, where they opened for hometown friends Future Islands. Ed and Devlin were outrageously generous with their time, their insights, and their tour bus seltzer.
[Edited lightly for length and clarity]
Pedal Fuzz: When I listened to the song âSeagullâ it made me wonder: what is your songwriting process? When I hear it, I imagine coming up with that bass riff and building lyrically and vocally from there. So, do you guys bring different parts, do you take turns bringing things, do you both bring stuff, do you just wait for inspiration? How do you build a song?
Devlin: Well, that one specificallyâwe did a lot of different things for this record. For the first couple of records Ed had a vocal melody and then Iâd write to that. You know, the âSeagullâ bass line kind of mirrors the vocal. But for Riddles, basically when we started recording with Dan, we came in with a bunch of songs and then to a click track just kind of put everything together with just bass and voice. Then we started just making a map of the song. âSeagullâ was the first one that we worked on where he was like âOh, letâs put in a kick here,â or âLetâs repeat this partâŚâ
Ed: I remember I was listening to this show called American Routes and I was hearing all of these old songs, and I was like âMan, itâs all about the melody!â Then I came up with this little dirge thatâs like five-tenths of the song, you know [Ed hums the jazzy, descending and re-ascending bass line here]. It was our usual old process of humming it, Devlin thinking about his thing, but then inputting it to Danâs formula of kind of taking each piece one at a time, deconstructing it, and kind of building in steps instead of like âAlright, cool, we can get this done and get lunch!â You know?
Devlin: Yeah. And each song on Riddles had a different, like, inception or birth, âcause half of it was written in the studio, some stuff that was brought in got tossedâŚ
Ed: Yeah. And it was so weird making a song from the ground. There were a few songs that were made actually in the studio, which is not at all what I usually do. And it was really fun, very freeing, and it puts you in line with that sense of improvisation. You know, like when youâre really in the zone and youâre like âOh wow, I could do this for living!â Thereâs those electric kind of moments where the flow is really good and stuffâs coming out, and youâre like âWait, maybe this will stay, this is good.â And being comfortable enough in a studio to get to that place was an accomplishment, you know, because normally I feel uncomfortable, and I feel like this was the first time I really felt at home.
Devlin: Yeah.
PF: So, do you enjoy playing live more than you enjoy recording?
Ed: You know, I used to enjoy playing live more than recording but now I feel like Dan has really opened up the process and made it fun to the point where I actually like them equally, if not recording is actually a little more fun because itâs likeâ
Devlin: Youâre making something new.
Ed: âyeah, youâre playing, you know, youâre creating, youâre making, itâs like being a kid with Play-Doh. [Switches to an excellent David Brent impression] âThe philosopher, not the toy.â
PF: Speaking of which, I loved your Ricky Gervais voice onstage at Hopscotch. My friend and I had been joking about The Office all day, so when you started doing that, I was like âIs he reading my diary?â
Ed: Oh, thatâs awesome! Itâs like [Back to David Brent] âIs he having a laugh?â Yeah, I donât know whatâs going to come out once I get onstage! I just let myself go, like âYou know what? Just be a goofball and donât worry about it, be yourself,â more so than I am in real life. âCause, you know, if youâre standing in line a Dunkin Donuts and you start like, screaming, people are going to get concerned.
PF: Ha, sure.
Ed: But onstage Iâve learned to let myself go within reason. Not like, boring people, or reciting The Canterbury Tales or something.
PF: Right, right, which Iâm sure you could actually do.
Ed: I can only do, like, the first twenty lines. Itâs been a while!
PF: Itâs so interesting that youâre bringing up letting yourself be yourself onstage, because I feel like, if Iâm playing onstage, Iâm notoriously bad at banter, and being natural onstage, so it ends up like âHey guys...uh, whatâs up?â Luckily, I play with people who are much better at that than I am, but are you saying thatâs not your personality normally?
Ed: Oh, it is, but being who you are onstage is tricky, because at first Iâm like âOh, Iâll get onstage and Iâll just be Ed!â But you do that thing where you kind of go above yourself, and youâre kind of watching yourself, that does happen sometimes. And you have to learn when that happens to still be free enough to keep in the zone and keep that flow going and not get into your head too much. I think years of touring taught me that, being in different situations on different stages. Just learning to, no matter whatâs going on around me, create that little bubble where I can just be myself. I just pretend like Iâm at my friendâs living room and weâre playing Mario Kart and smoking weed, then Iâm like âIâm gonna get up and do a song now!â That happy space, that good space, I always try to keep that around me, and then hopefully emanate that to other people.
PF: You mentioned working with Dan, and thatâs actually the second question I had written down, so: perfect, I anticipated this wonderfully!
Ed and Devlin: [Laughter, because I am hilarious]
PF: I was reading on your Bandcamp, and Iâm going to quote back to you what it says on there: âEd and Devlin dreamed of a fuller soundâlayered, breathing arrangements their early rapid-fire compositions always seemed to imply, without yet having the tools to realize.â Iâm wondering how exactly working with Danâwhat tools he brought and what tools you discovered togetherâhelped you realize that vision that you think you didnât quite have before.
Devlin: I think a lot of it was just having the time toâand I alluded to this earlier, because previous records were like âGet it done as soon as possibleâŚâ
Ed: Itâs all about the money, and worrying about the budget.
Devlin: ...where Dan was more like âLetâs take some time.â And you know, a lot of the earlier songs, thereâs stuff going on that itâs almost like your imagination can fill in, like âOh, I hear a guitar doing something over here, or whatever.â But for this I think we just wanted to write a record and figure out how to play it live later. Because, you know, Party Jail and Jazz Mind were very much like âWeâre a live band, how are we going to do things live? Itâs just the two of us.â We just wanted to expand the sound because I think we both appreciate artists who arenât just doing the same thing over and over again. Iâm not saying Slayer should make a jazz record, but, you know, I feel like I donât need to hear another Slayer record, Iâve already got Hell Awaits. We want to do something interesting and do something different, and having [Dan] we were able to really show what we could do as musicians, too.
Ed: We were restrained by necessity before.
Devlin: Yeah. So it was like âYeah, letâs bring in a mellotron!â And especially Edâs vocal performances, theyâre pretty different than what was on a lot of the other stuff because now heâs like âOh, I donât have to play the drums and sing this.â
Ed: [singing] Now I can be free!
PF: Haha, yeah.
Ed: And sometimes Dan and I would do whole days where I would just get in there and make a pot of coffee and heâs like âHey, sing that Billy Joel song you were singing the other night!â And Iâd ask why, and heâd say âJust do it!â and Iâd say âOkayâŚâItâs nine oâclock [on a Saturday]...ââ And heâd say âNow change the words...ok, now just focus on that one word...ok, now change thatâ, and then all of a sudden the melodyâs different, and then all of a sudden weâre not even doing that song anymore. And then weâre building something, and then an idea forms, and then from that, you know, itâs like we start making the roots of a song, but making it coming from a place of fun and excitement, versus etching something out in stone, sitting there at a cafe like âI gotta write this fucking song!â Instead, itâs coming from a place of âOh yeah, I feel like Iâm at karaoke night, Iâm having a good time!â Itâs getting to a place where I wasn't feeling a need to filter or gate anything, and I was really being myself, letting my actual voice come to the surface, more so than I feel like I wouldâve had I made the songs months in advance and had in my mind exactly what I wanted. Like, putting me in a space where someone was like âHey, do this, try this, try that!ââ it was fun, and it was like a cross between a coach and a magician or something. And it was like âthis might be weird, but wait: itâs not weird, itâs cool! He tricked me into making a good song!â
Devlin: âYou tricked me!â Do you want coffee?
PF: Uh, I just had one and Iâll die if I have another one, thank you.
Devlin: [Laughing] Gotta know the wall!
PF: Exactly!
Ed: But yeah, I think in general I just felt more free in the studio.
PF: Huh, thatâs interesting! So, this is a complex, multi-part reply-slash-question: when I hear you talk about making an album without having to worry about performing it, without that being the primary concern, and then I hear you talk about Dan being this coach-magician, who sort of gets things out of you that you might not have gotten out of yourself, it really sounds like...well first of all, my first thought when you were talking about not having to record based on practicalityâand this is the least original observation ever, butâit made me think about when the Beatles just stopped worrying about making songs they could play live and just started fucking with layers and tapes and multitracking things they couldnât possibly have done live. Then that led me also to think about when you were talking about, again, the magician-coach: I was just having a conversation with a friend about how a good music producer can be like a good theatre director, they can elicit a performance from you that you couldnât necessarily get from just, say, running lines by yourself. Is that crazy? Does that sound kind of like what youâre talking about?
Devlin: No, thatâs right.
Ed: Yeah, and also I think also a person who is either A) good at observing, which I think Dan is, and then B) has known me for a long time, and is also an avid fan of the music, is perhaps seeing things objectively that I might not see from sitting in the cockpit. âHey man, youâve been singing out of your nose for the past two albums; thatâs cool, sounded groovy!â And you know, there were definitely some sonorous, kind of a capella moments on those first two albums, because I grew up listening to Billy Joel, Elton John, Sting, Patti Smith, REM...you know, a whole slew of things, but a lot of these pop musicians who are writing these three minute, encapsulated ballads, where I was doing these thirty second songs, like [delightfully staccato] âba-da-dah-da-dat! Wa-wah-wa-wah-WA!â So, going from more noise-experimental into this thing that was the thing that drove me in the beginning...I mean, itâs funny: my first experience singing live was Montell Jordanâs âThis Is How We Do Itâ.
PF: Excellent start, excellent start!
Ed: Yeah, it was at an open mic and I sang it and got asked to join a band! Then, we did a bunch of Smashing Pumpkins covers and stuff like that.
PF: This keeps building, I love this setlist!
Ed: We didnât have any shows, we just practiced. Then I tried doing dance moves, and they kind of kicked me out of the band! But in any event, the initial dragon that I was always chasing was trying to be those people, like I wanted to be [Michael] Stipe, you know, I wanted to be up there. But then, as I got older, I ended up working doing dishes and tough jobs and stuff like that, and being like âOh, I guess Iâm not going to be famous but Iâll work on this as a craft.â And I remember I took an art appreciation class, and I was just like âOh, art!â And I watched this Jackson Pollock movie: âOh, interesting!â Youâre just learning more about being quote-unquote an artist, and thatâs interesting. So, stepping away from, like, the indie-rock/Smashing Pumpkins stuff I was doing, and moving to Baltimore and seeing performance artists, minimalists, and noise musicians who were more in the performance art realm, and going into that world, that kind of shaped the pop thing that I was doing, and, I feel like made it better because it forced me to deconstruct, and then in that deconstruction re-amalgamating who I was. I was actually thinking about it much more than I was before, when I was just trying to sound like Built To Spill or whatever. If that makes any senseâŚ
PF: No, it makes a bunch of sense, and you just name-checked a billion bands I like.
Ed: Hahaha!
PF: Iâm really glad you talked about Stipe because I hear so much Stipe when I hear you sing, in all the best ways, so Iâm glad I wasnât wrong about that. The Billy Joel ties in too, weâll definitely talk about that later on. So, you were talking about Baltimore. It seems likeâagain, when I was watching you guys at Hopscotch and listening to your superlative stage banterâyou were talking about how a lot of the songs were inspired by a particular place. âKid Radiumâ you said was about Baltimore, and âCulebraâ is about Puerto Rico, so I just wondered if the sense of place, of spatial association, informed a lot of what you do?
Ed: You know, Iâve actually never thought about it, but even going back and thinking about âSermonâ, that was a lot about red tape and Baltimore politics and people trying to do good things and not being able to get them through because of bureaucracy, and so thatâs about a place. âRatsâ was about my fear of rats when I lived in a warehouse space where I would see rats and be like âAhhhhhh!â, but then also metaphorically it was about communing with God. I saw this Tori Amos video-âand she might have been stoned outâbut she was talking about this one religion where people would let rats actually crawl on them, because they felt that that was a way to kind of commune with God, and I found that interesting. And itâs a very limited understanding from a VH1 interview, but I just thought thatâs an interesting thing juxtaposed next to this fear, because we look at one end of the spectrum and itâs like âRats! Vermin!â And then itâs like âGOD!â And itâs just kind of interesting, thereâs got to be something there. But you, know, for âplaceâ in that song, itâd probably be the warehouse space I was in. And then I was also listening to Swans a lot at that timeâthat guyâs always singing about God and power, you almost feel like heâs an X-Men character or something, like Thor.
âKid Radiumâ is definitely Baltimore, but also at the same time I saw a play called âThe Radium Sistersâ, and it was about women that worked in a factory who were exposed to radium, and so just about the toxicity of an environment, using that as a metaphor for the kids being in an environment that was toxic, and the long-term effects of that, similar to working class women whose bodies were falling apart because of this exposure to radium. And toxicity comes in different forms, be it verbal, mental, emotional, and is affecting people in those ways.
So, as far as location goes, maybe itâs not the centerpiece for every songâbut even âWhen Iâm In A Carâ is about driving around Utica, upstate New York in a car. Itâs kind of the first time Iâve actually ever thought about that and itâs a really good point. Location is...you know, I remember as a writer, theyâre like âWhere are you? Whatâs in the room, whatâs around you? Describe itâdonât overdescribe it, but describe it.â I guess location is there at least two-thirds of the time unless Iâm singing out something very abstract. Like air!
PF: Again from the Bandcampâsorry, but the Bandcamp is a goldmineâit sounds like all three of you went through kinda some shit while this album was being recorded. One of the the things I noticed when I was listening to it in my kitchen while I was making dinner is that a lot of the stuff is either very anthemic, or it felt like it was very sort of meditative, with loose and repeating phrases, and I wondered if any of that could have been either consciously or subconsciously a way to...well, things that are either very exuberant or very repetitive are good ways to shut down the mind for a second and escape. Not that you havenât tended to sound like that anyway, I just didnât know if you guys found any of that to be the case while you were recording, or if that was intentional, or if it was a means of escape to clear your mind of things, or if Iâm just pulling all of that out of my ass.
Ed: I think moments of introspection and meditation kind of go tandemly with intense life things like death or big changes or transitions and things of that nature. Theyâre so intense that you almost need to recoil and go into that meditative state to process it. So, it goes from âGriiiieeeef!â, to âNow Iâm going to think about the griefâ to âGRIIIIEEEEF!!!â again.
Devlin: Thatâs just the cycle of grief, it oscillates.
Ed: Yeah. The grief snake!
Devlin: The closer you are to the event, the more your swings are completely erratic; you know, petal on the water kind of thing. Also, at the time, I was living in Rhode Island.
PF: Yeah, so you were commuting back and forth, right?
Devlin: Yeah, so we werenât even seeing each other. It was like every six weeks or so.
PF: Were you driving that, or flying, or bussing?
Devlin: Driving. I think a couple of times I took the bus. Itâs six or seven hours depending on the traffic in Connecticut and New Jersey. But I think that every session all of us had something else that was happening, or had happened, or we were experiencing a certain peak or valley. Like, âRiddlesâ for instance, we were working on one other song and Dan was just like âAll right, Iâll be back in an hour, I just gotta say âhiâ to my girlfriend. Hereâs the setup and things, just dick around.â And we came up with the chorus for that sort of by accident, we didnât set out to make a U2-style anthem. So Iâd say it wasnât all necessarily by design, it was just sort of what came together, and we were excited about it, and we followed it that way.
Ed: Yeah, and I feel like kind when we first met with Dan a lot of the stuff was more the concise, beat poet, kind of slam style that we usually did in terms of just like one minute little haikus or whatever, or like a minute and a half with a little bridge, verse-chorus-verse. I think he manipulated space and composition to make the songs, to give more space to them, to let them breathe more, and then they developed more richness and nuance because of that. But I think it was also with him changing the composition, it made me also think differently about the song itself.
Devlin: Yeah, like how youâd sing it and everything.
Ed: Yeah, and to live in the space of the song for a little bit longer, and therefore to maybe contemplate some different things in terms of melody and structure, like âWhat am I saying here, and how do I want this to end?â And making it feel more natural too, because I feel like with the earlier songs, theyâre great, but because theyâre so shortâand I wanted it to be that way and I think it was a good reflection of the time, because Iâve always liked songs like âIâm On Fireâ by Bruce Springsteen, which is like a minute and forty-eight seconds, and it doesnât need to be any longer, and I always thought âWell, Iâm just going to make music like thatââbut, you know, started myself listening to things more along the lines of Massive Attack where space is definitely in the mix in terms of what makes it good, just giving it room. And I feel like that for us was good because we were just like [in a spitting staccato] âDAT-DAT-DAT-DAT-DAT!â And then Dan would be like [crooning in a smooth legato] âDaaaaah, da-dah-di-daaaah, di-da-da-dum, letâs unpack it a little bit and slow down, and have fun!â Not that thereâs nothing wrong with, like, a one minute Buzzcocks song, but it was nice to put on a different hat, and I feel like that brought out different things.
PF: So let me ask you then: whatâs it like playing the songs without Dan? It seems like you guys were all a unit while you were recording it. Is it difficult or weird?
Devlin: No. I mean, itâs definitely a new setup, playing to backing tracks.
PF: Right, you guys have the tracks, obviously.
Devlin: Whatâs interesting [is that] I was always resistant to it because it was just sort of like âWhatâs really happening [live on stage]?â But then when I actually listened to the tracks [by themselves] without the bass or the vocals it was like, âOh,wait, those things need to be there.â Itâs not like at any moment we could stop performing, or stop playingâthe bass needs to be there because otherwise it just sounds completely bonkers, and realizing that, it was like âOk, this isnât really too far; even though weâve adapted and added this other layer, the essence of the band is still really just Ed and I.â And I think even a lot of the melodic content, some things that Dan and I would be kicking around like making up chords or experimenting with different things, there was more of a back and forth in terms of composing that stuff, so it was more of a collaborative thing, and not that he was just like âDo this, do that.â Because we always knew that it was going to be just us, anyway. So I guess I havenât really thought that.
Ed: Yeah, that would be fun. I would love, love, to do it with Dan, but heâs got an album to record, heâs on the road. And in terms of being pragmatic, you know, at the point weâre at now weâre still a band thatâs coming up, so having two people makes it something thatâs feasible and sustainable on the road, you know, versus like if we had all the instruments that are on the album. It would be awesome, but that would be like a ten piece band. I donât think weâd be able to even cover everyoneâs transportation!
PF: Right, right.
Devlin: Some people would only be playing two songs, you know what I mean?
PF: Right, ha! Like, flugelhorn guy would pop inâŚ
Ed: Down the road it would be cool, knock on wood, to get to the point where that is a possibility, but in the meantime wanting to evolve and make something new but at the same time finding a way to bridge that until itâs realityâI feel like Dan did a good job of giving us the tools to do that on the road. You know, and going forward, I think weâll be bringing back live percussion into the mix, which Iâm excited to do. But I think for this phase, we needed to do thatâjust the two of us go out there with the backing tracks and do our thing on top of it. And thereâs so much show on top of whatâs there, in terms of whatâs physical, Devlinâs putting a lot of texture and style and working with the energy thatâs right in the room too, and then Iâm cracking jokes between songs [chuckling].
PF: I have a weird tendency to describe band dynamics in terms of romantic relationship dynamics, but it sounds likeâwell, the whole time Iâve been thinking âMan, it sounds like they had a really successful threesome, like: they brought another person into the bedroom, and it was cool, and no one was weird about it, and they moved on or whatever, and everythingâs fine now.â
Devlin: Ha! Yeah, weâll call each other again sometime!
Ed: It challenged us!
PF: Exactly! It expanded your horizons, but in a good way. You know yourselves a little better now.
Devlin: Thatâs funny.
Ed: Thatâs a good metaphor, yeah.
PF: Ok, Iâm going to ask you two more questions. This is something that I ask all of my friends, or really anybody interesting Iâm talking toâand it doesnât have to be cool, because my answer isnât particularly cool, but Iâm curious: what are the first albums you ever bought? Like, with your own money, you went to the store and bought this. I will tell you right away that mine was Billy Joel, Storm Front. I was in the fifth gradeâŚ
Ed: [singing] âThereâs a storm front comingâŚâ
PF: Exactly, yeah!Â
Ed: Downeaster Alexa!
PF: Man, youâre just naming the tracks! Delightful.
Ed: The first thing that I actually bought was [REMâs] Monster on cassette tape, I think. That was the first thing that I didnât borrow from my sister and/or find like, in the garbage, I bought it new, like a brand new album. I think the first thing I got was Elton Johnâs Greatest Hits Volume II, but that was used, like one dollar. This was Monster, brand new, sealed, ten dollars: âOh wow, thatâs expensive!â I got that and I played it over and over. The second album was Sting, The Dream of The Blue Turtles. I bought it in Spanish for my friend who hated Sting and was having trouble in Spanish class, so I was like âHere you go, Happy Birthday!â as a gag gift. He was like âI donât want thisâ so I took it home and listened to it, and I was like âWow, this sounds good in Spanish, maybe Iâll try it in English. Whoa, this is actually a pretty cool album. He was in this band called The Police...oh, theyâre really good, this is really good stuff!â and from there, then kind of discovering other things. But Iâd say yeah, Monster and The Dream of the Blue Turtles were my first two purchases. Thatâs pretty weirdâŚ
PF: No, I love it, itâs a pretty good mix. What about you, Devlin?
Devlin: Ones that I bought by myself that I remember...I think it was Nevermind and Bushâs first record?
PF and Ed simultaneously: Sixteen Stone?
Devlin: Yeah! And then those got taken away.
PF: Did they? Like, by a parent?
Devlin: Yeah. I used to just listen to like, oldies radio, all the way up until high school; I just was not down with contemporary music at all, so that was my âWell, people like these, let me try that,â and then I was like âYeah, I really like this Nirvana, this sounds crazy!â Then I ended up finding out what I really liked by going to punk shows and stuff like that. And then, you know, fucking Ride The Lightning comes alongâŚ
PF: Yeah, yeah, itâs a jump from The Swinginâ Medallions to Ride the Lightning for sure.
Ed: Ha, thereâs a little in between!
PF: Yeah, some space to be filled in for sure.
Ed [once again in Gervais mode]: A bit of a chasm!
PF: Bit of! The last thing I want to ask isâwhatever, I was super touched by this. Again, when you guys were playing at Hopscotch, and I donât know if you do this all the time, but at the end of the set you shared this wonderful hugâI wasnât even drunk but I thought âMan, thatâs so awesome!â The shows are super high-energy, and you give it everything, and you spend so much time together. How do you manage to...I mean, Iâve been on the road with people I wanted to kill eighteen hours into it, you know, âI might stab this motherfucker to death in the car right now.â How do you guysâagain with the relationshipsâbut how do you keep it fresh?
Ed:I think itâs like...I think weâre lucky because we are actual friends. I mean weâre best friends in real life, we get along and actually hang out anyway. Being in a band with anybody, yeah, thereâs going to be times where itâs like âOof, I just need a minute to decompress,â or itâs like âWhat were you saying? Iâm sorry, Iâm zoning.â Everyone needs their Zen time and their space, even if the relationship is perfect. Itâs like family, you know? Youâre going to drive each other crazy sometimes, thatâs just the nature of being on the road and youâre both going through a very stressful thing where you have to be vulnerable and thereâs just going to be moments when youâre like âDude, I need a minute,â but in general I think that we do have very good chemistry as friends. Devlinâs even looked us up on astrological charts.
Devlin: Yeah. I forget exactly what it is, but itâs supposed to be like fire and air signs. I think that in the Secret Book of Relationships it was like âAs a working partnership this pairing tends to make something thatâs familiar and recognizable but completely different. The Week of Genius is always floating up in the air and The Week of Balanced Strength is the centering thing.â As I was reading it I was like âMan, this is pretty right onâŚâ
PF: Yeah, thatâll work.
Ed: I also think Devlin has a lot of patience, and I actually learned a lot of patience too growing up, I just had a real smorgasbord or personalities I dealt with. I think both of us had challenges we dealt with, and I think it taught us both to have more patience, perhaps, than most people do, coming from those different situations where we had to be not the center of attention and/or giving to another person and/or kind of a nurturer, in a sense. You know in most relationships I tend to be like âlet me cook,â or âI got it!â or this and that, but there are definitely times where Iâm like âI need some help todayâ. I feel like weâre both those types of folks, I like to think that we put others before ourselves and we go out of our way to help people. Coming from a big family, for me, being youngest with seven kids in the house, getting the hand-me-downs of the hand-me-downs, having an older brother who was autistic and needed to be looked after at timesâitâs like, itâs not about you and youâre not the center of attention. From that experience growing up, and I think from just knowing an array of different personalities and situations, and having different jobs, we had a lot of life experience prior to the band to learn that kind of patience too. But getting back to Devlin: yeah, I think he is very patient, and I think that thereâs definitely times where a lot of people wouldâve thrown me into the river, where Devlin was like âAlright man, I just need a minute. [Pause for a beat] Arrrggghhh!â A lot of grace under fire.
Devlin: Our favorite sitcom.
Ed: Also, our favorite sitcom!
PF: Isnât it the best? Well, I think thatâs it. Thanks so much guys, it was fun!
Melvyn Brown is a musician (Toothsome, Broads, NONCANON, Ladies Auxiliary) and writer from Greensboro, NC who is also passionate about the Four Ts: taking photographs, Thai food, technology, and thrift stores. His appreciation of Scotch whisky is not necessarily related to Steely Dan. You can follow him on Twitter at @metaquasiproto, Instagram at @generalclearinghouse, or at generalclearinghouse.com














