really? that sounds interesting (unfortunately), re: film and the construction of whiteness, do you know where we can read more
a good place to start is this letterboxd post by my friend peter labuza, which talks about the use of digital photography in MAGIC MIKE XXL toĀ ācorrectā the ingrained history of racist portrayals of black bodies in hollywood movies.
from there, follow the links. richard dyerās WHITE is one of the most important critical texts for understanding the history of hollywood cinema as the construction of whiteness.Ā
this strain of film criticism builds off of theĀ āwhiteness studiesā initiated by social critics like w.e.b. dubois and james baldwin in the the early to mid 20th c.
most people tend to focus on the philosophical treatment of race in movies (i.e., through character), while ignoring the technologies that made that type of treatment not only normalized, but essential. basically because most people watching movies have no idea about the production details of lighting & cameras, and those who do donāt frequently analyze the connection between production and theory.Ā
itās also interesting to consider that digital photography allows for a larger range of skin tones to be representedāand altered/editedāvs. 35mm film. keep this in mind when film bros want to argue with you about why film is better.Ā













