Untitled

I've been seeing this same brainrot ai generated image of a completely out of context scene and seeing the way white men literally POUNCE on any opportunity to dehumanise black women and insult them in the most vile ways pisses me off so fucking much.

Have you ever seen white women be this enthusiastic to objectify and degrade black men to this extent for no reason? You'll barely ever see a white woman comment on a picture of a black and white man saying 'beauty and the beast'.

Visual analysis

Overall photorealism: Lighting, color grading, depth of field, and atmospheric perspective (soft dusk sky transitioning to the illuminated tower) look natural and consistent with a genuine evening photo taken near the Seine.

Eiffel Tower: The golden lighting, structural details, and perspective match how the tower actually appears when lit at dusk/night. Reflections on the water are plausible.

People:

Skin textures, hair strands, facial features, and expressions look organic.

The blonde woman’s hand pose, fingernails, jewelry (bracelets, chain strap), nose ring, and sunglasses sit naturally on her head.

The other woman’s features, earring, and clothing folds also appear consistent with a real photo.

Background elements: Cars, trees, streetlights, buildings, and distant figures show normal photographic blur and scale. No obvious warping, melting, or impossible geometry.

Common AI tells are absent: No distorted hands/fingers, mismatched jewelry, unnatural skin smoothing, floating objects, text artifacts, or inconsistent shadows/lighting between foreground and background.

Bottom line: This looks like a legitimate tourist photo taken in Paris. High-end AI image generators (especially by 2026) can produce very convincing results, but this image doesn’t show the usual residual artifacts that would indicate generation.

So much misogyny in the comments, saying that she deserves to die. These morons should advocate for abortion so that this doesn’t happen.

And really? Hot take even in these spaces, but at this point I don’t care about infanticide of your own child. Women should have the right to decide who lives and who dies. Especially if it’s a male who will grow up to be another misogynist asshole anyway. This is how things should be if you want to avoid suffering.

They’re shaming the mother for wanting to keep the baby after she was found out, no shit because society wants mothers to pretend to be happy. Of course she wants to look good.

Always remember that men are the gold diggers, the resource hoarders, and they do NOT care about you. They will happily watch a woman work herself to the grave, grow sick, work through the sickness, and sell priceless belongings and continue using her.

23 criminal charges over the last 14 years. Most of them violent. Essentially no jail time:

On jail or prison time: He has received sentences, but many were short, suspended, or fully credited as time already served in county jail while awaiting resolution of cases. Key outcomes include:

• 2019/2020: Pleaded guilty (or found guilty) to discharging a weapon into occupied property and a felony probation violation. Sentenced to 20–36 months in prison; he was released in June 2020 after serving less than a year (details on exact suspension or early release vary slightly across reports). wcnc.com

• August 2024: Guilty of breaking or entering, injury to personal property, and misdemeanor probation violation → 90 days in jail, credited as time served. wcnc.com

• 2025 cases: Convictions included disorderly conduct (11 days, time served), assault on a government official/officer (6 days, time served), and (from a December 2025 arrest resolved in March 2026) assault with a deadly weapon plus carrying a concealed weapon → 89 days (or about three months), fully credited as time already served in jail; he was released the day of sentencing

And now he’s serially filming his attacks. Arrested yet again.

Infanticide

Almost exclusively committed by biological mothers.

Fathers (or other males) are extremely rare as perpetrators. This is one of the clearest and most consistent findings in the literature.

Perpetrators of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA)—formerly known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSBP)—are overwhelmingly female.

Large systematic reviews of published case reports and series consistently report a strong female predominance:

A 2026 systematic review covering 455 perpetrators found 92.75% female (and only 7.25% male).

A systematic review of 796 cases of medical child abuse (closely overlapping with FDIA/MSBP) found 97.6% female perpetrators, with 95.6% being the victim’s mother.

Other reviews report figures in the 91–98% female range (commonly 91–95% when focusing on mothers as primary perpetrators).

Mothers (biological or primary female caregivers) account for the large majority of cases.

Professional drivers (especially truck/CDL roles) remain heavily male-dominated. Recent figures put women at roughly 8–10% of truck drivers / driver-sales workers (Data USA ~7.9% women in the broader category; WIT Index ~9.5% for CDL professional drivers). Using ~3.5 million total professional drivers yields approximately 3.2–3.25 million men and 0.28–0.33 million women.

Annual mileage is consistently higher for men (classic FHWA figures: men ~16,550 miles/year, women ~10,142). Recent daily driving time is higher for men (often ~60–70 minutes vs. ~50–55 for women). Assuming ~50–55 driving years and converting via typical speeds/mileage yields lifetime hour estimates on the order of tens of thousands of hours, with men higher.

The 1974 Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) is the source of the common claim. It made it illegal for creditors to discriminate against applicants based on sex or marital status in any aspect of a credit transaction (loans, credit cards, mortgages, etc.). It did not create a new right to open deposit accounts like checking or savings, which are not credit transactions. Banks had never been under a federal ban preventing women from depositing their own money.

Unmarried women (as feme sole) generally retained legal capacity to own property, contract, and manage finances. Married women’s rights expanded through 19th-century Married Women’s Property Acts (starting in the late 1830s–1840s in various states and largely complete by around 1900), which allowed them to control their own earnings and property rather than everything automatically belonging to the husband under coverture.

Women appeared as depositors in thrift institutions as early as the 1840s; an 1893 survey found more than 25% of thrift members were women with the same rights as men. Some banks even marketed specifically to women (e.g., special teller windows).

Women founded or led banks well before 1974 (examples include Louise M. Weiser in the 1870s, Deborah Powers in the 1870s–1890s, and Maggie L. Walker’s St. Luke Penny Savings Bank in 1903, which offered checking and savings accounts).

By the 1960s, independent deposit accounts for women (married or single) had become more routine as social norms shifted.