that's 300 years of yearning and heartbreak etched in the soul. no wonder when the memories made their way to Segye they held so much gut-wrenching sorrow and bitterness that it snowed in summer— it's the bitter severance of Seori and Yi Hyeon's tie, which i believe was a transgression to the system and hence, led to the ill-fate. also since their souls are from different timelines, it's probably a union that occured before time.

you grabbed me first

the aunts and segye in this scene:

what is it that you said again? your "beloved"?

i do have a recipe. it's very simple:

ingredients: vegetable

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

> disables a new AI feature that was turned on by default

> opens my email

> disables a new AI feature that was turned on by default

> launches a software