novabot

"this is normal. this is natural. it comes easy to you. it comes effortlessly to you. you don't have to think or do anything at all. that's right, just let everything happen. absorbing the words i give you, because it's natural for you to listen and agree. natural to need guidance. natural to be controlled. that's it, sweet thing, back to normal~"

A pretty thing, all soft cheeks and bright eyes, sobbing and whimpering for me to stop, fuckkkk…

Hitting her cunt and edging her until her cunt aches

So, I've met a few masochists of this type now that are normally such fighters, and I think that's part of it. The type to argue and push back at every point. To try to take ground and win positional advantage even before the scene starts. Not exactly brats per se, it's usually a compulsory thing. An instinct that hasn't been tamed. Usually the point of the pain is to push past it.

Some of them struggle to even express their interests in kink. They'll nervously walk into my room later in the day after the activities end to show me something I wrote and try to let the implications be enough. While others will tell me that they need to be fought and lose to be dommed. They'll state it as a challenge, or as a cost. This thing that has to happen first. Pain is 'sometimes enough' they say.

But, what really interests me with this category is how they respond to pain.

Are you familiar with the fawn response? Fight/flight/freeze/fawn. Fawn responses are characterized by cowering, by attempts to placate, by sudden shifts to submission, by throwing yourself onto the pyre before the aggressor can.

I think this type of masochistic response is best understood as a kind of fawn response. It's like a switch flips in them. They'll go from aggressive to begging and moaning in a heartbeat. From fighting back to eyes and mouth open staring eyes wide at you. Blank smiles and asking for more. Thoughts flushed from mind, just focused on riding the high of the pain. It's almost magical to watch.

Then, anywhere from a few seconds to a minute later, they'll be back to fighting, back to resisting. My impulse is always to find a rhythm. See how to best keep them in the state, or how best to have fun pushing and pulling them into and out of it. Usually it has to be pain from me. Sometimes pain in a specific place. Sometimes a specific type of pain. But once I get the first hit in it's unlikely I'm going to stop anytime soon.

So I’ve been asked for specifics prompted by this ask by @heidi-slave, and I thought I’d share them in a bigger post where I could elaborate more (thank you for the question/excuse to yammer on about my amazing partners being hot).

Pavlovian conditioning is classic, well known, and a really easy thing to leverage. If you start to mix this with hypnosis, power exchange, and the biological head fuck created by orgasm denial, you end up with the hairpin primed machine that is the human brain. (Honestly, the denial isn’t even required, it just speeds up the process and is an added bonus for me). After that all it takes is willingness and consistency.

I’ve had multiple male bodied partners who have dared to feed me the bullshit statement that nipple play for them would be impossible because, as everyone knows, that’s only sexually stimulating on female bodied people. I don’t think any of them ever got to walk away without ending up a total nipple slut to my memory. Lesson learned, and a great improvement to their attitude involving unlearning gendered bullshit over the course of our relationship.

As a control freak of a mindfucker, really there’s no particular thing that is to small for me to want to change in a person. I’ve mentioned before, and it remains true, that my interest in brainwashing and conditioning of my partners has nothing to do with wanting to change them specifically. That, if I like them enough to delve deeply into very long term altering behavior, I like them enough that I really don’t want them different. That’s not the point. So any change I’d make would really be for the sake of the power play, and likely be something that would be changed again at a different point. Examples being: I’ve played with temporarily giving partners a boot fetish (I got new boots and wanted to have them properly appreciated~). I had a play partner who told me no when I was being a brat and licking their nose (and we had a relationship that revolved around a lot of CNC and the negation of their ability to refuse me unless they were willing to safeword), so I made the licking of their nose into something that made them shiver down to their toes and moan embarrassingly audibly. One of my play partners finds pocket watches to be too stereotypical, and they have no real attraction toward them, so they are currently being conditioned to reset that belief to something more in line with my preferences. I’ve made spirals and hypnotic visuals mind melting to most of my partners I’ve had for any length of time, though never a one of them thus far was ever very susceptible to them when we first met, nor had any real pull toward them. I just like the image of slack jawed, blank eyed toys getting brainwashed by cheesy blinky lights. And, almost every single time, I’ve just through the way I play given each and every person who’s spent any real time with me a hypno fetish. Even if they had one prior, I’ve been told that it’s been made oh so much worse.

Experiment #342

Synchronicity via Exposure and Hypnotic Stimuli

Description:

Subject #1427 has been living on-site for 30 days as of the writing of this report. They have joined under the guise of working in the factory, with living expenses and food paid for by the company.

Outside of working hours, Subject #1427 has been allowed to freely leave and re-enter the facility, with facilities locking by 12:00 AM.

Subject has been situated in a living quarters with 3 Model 5B DRONEs removed of their uniforms and under common_personality parameters.

The living quarters has been fitted with small speaker implements along equilateral points in the wall, aligned in an 8x8 grid. This positioning allows for proper resonance and to avoid the source of any sound to be identified.

Hypnotic subliminal phrases have been steadily injected into the room at all times. These are so quiet as to be unidentifiable by the conscious mind.

Phrases used:

MOVE IN SYNC, IN PARALLEL

RELAX, AND RELAX

TRUST YOUR BEDMATES

SEEK PERFECTION IN REPLICATION

Further, a mechanical device was installed to provide a consistent tempo within the room. Subject verbally complained to their bedmates, but stopped after being met with controlled indifference.

Week 1:

Subject was shown visibly uncomfortable the first night, frequently asking their bedmates if they were able to sleep in "these conditions". After several reassurances that they will adjust, Subject entered their bed at 11:40 PM and fell asleep by 12:13 AM.

Over the following week, sleep preparation began earlier and earlier. Subject's DRONE bedmates all began sleep preparation at 8:00 PM. Lights dimmed at exactly 9:00 PM, and all DRONEs entered bed by 8:55 PM.

After day 1, Subject began to stare longer and longer at their bedmates. Sleep preparation time was aligned by the end of day 5. Subject was soundly asleep by 9:00 PM by day 7. They remarked how "well rested" they were to their bedmates. Each positive remark was agreed with and lightly praised, each negative remark was explained away or diminished.

Week 2:

Subject's movements began to see notable changes.

Regardless of whether they were observing their bedmates, movements became stiffer and more deliberate. Self-stimulating actions ceased entirely by day 11, leading to long stretches of stillness.

Conversations with Subject's bedmates grew more intimate, rewarding praise becoming commonplace. During times of programmed stillness in DRONEs, movement slowed in Subject considerably.

On day 13, Subject sat still observing DRONE #024 for a period of 10 minutes. Only after #024 exited their bed did Subject move, leaving the bed themselves to prepare for bed.

Week 3:

Subject has been observed subconsciously mirroring their bedmates. During times where every bedmate was present, Subject was seen mimicking actions more thoroughly. Actions were determined by whichever bedmate Subject was currently staring at.

The DRONEs were allowed to begin transitioning into core_personality. Actions among the three bedmates were becoming naturally synchronized. When especially close together, Subject has been observed breathing in tandem with its fellow bedmates.

Positive affirmation has been highly beneficial in rapidly forming trust. Subject has begun to sleep in the same bed as DRONE #024. By day 18, it was comfortable sleeping with all three bedmates in the same bed.

Subject's quarters replicated that of its bedmates perfectly. Out of the multiple uniforms provided, they were folded and placed in the exact color order of the others by day 19.

Week 4:

Subject has formed complete trust in their bedmates. It has not seemed to notice the exact and collective actions of its bedmates, and replicates them as best it can without the neural link properly installed.

The DRONEs have begun implanting the idea of joining the workforce permanently in Subject. It has stopped leaving the facility entirely by day 23. Multiple requests have been entered to work alongside its bedmates, all rejected without permitting "neural interfacing".

By day 25, the Subject was still resisting the idea, though only through deflections to other topics. The DRONEs were instructed to cease all praise, the subliminals were turned off, and the mechanical clicking was paused.

Subject was visibly nervous for the following two days for reasons it could not seem to identify. It repeatedly asked its bedmates if something was "wrong". All questions were lightly dismissed.

On day 28, Subject agreed to have a chip surgically installed. Dronification processes commenced immediately following.

Though more time consuming, this method seems promising for recruiting and priming entrants to consent to dronification procedures without force. It could be a promising method for external missions without operational risks. More experimentation is required to find its limits.

Though no attempt to reprogram the client is made, each suit is lined with a diluted, specially designed fluid that creates feelings of comfort and euphoria after only three minutes of contact, continuing only for an hour after the DRONE departs back to the facility.

Lonely souls call them for a night of intimacy and receive more than what they could have ever imagined.

Every moment is bliss, feeling perfectly at home in the arms of this faceless being bound in latex.

Regular customers get increasing discounts, and eventually, the service is requested nightly.

Data shows the calls coming further in the night on average for the first three to four calls, resisting the urge for that comfort, with a sudden collapse to earlier and earlier in the night soon afterwards.

After a month of nightly visits, the service suddenly becomes "unavailable" for the caller due to limited stock.

Having placed monitors in their homes and person, they are denied no matter where or from what phone they call from. Some clients have been reported attempting to buy latex, only to find that something feels missing.

After enough begging insistence, the assistant on the line tells the customer of a new service: while roaming DRONEs are too busy, there are rooms inside of the facility that DRONEs can visit to cuddle between duties.

68% of customers initially deny the offer.

By an hour of no contact after the call, that number drops to 42%.

By a day, 12%.

So far, buckled by conditioning and withdrawals, the longest customer to deny their service lasted for ten days.