The Consequence of Sound
When sound is added to video, the emotional impact can change dramatically
In keeping this blog about the suffering of people caught on camera, it is unavoidable that I will have to expose myself to images I would rather not see. As anthropologists, we are taught to record our thoughts and feelings while engaging in fieldwork.
So here is my reaction to a video of a child who has had his legs blown off in Syria, uploaded to Twitter by a BBC journalist. I have screen grabbed the tweet so that image you see is only the introductory text and the shadow of the cameraman.Â
Because of the way video works when it is uploaded to Twitter, the images immediately start moving when they appear on your screen. I watched the short video at first with no sound. My first thoughts were âCan this be real?â. I was searching for proof that it might not be real. If it were a fake, it would mean that this child was fine. That is what one might call âhopeâ.
A second look at who tweeted the video, a BBC journalist. He comes with the credibility of a network. He is extending his credibility to the video, whose source is unclear from this instance.Â
Itâs real. So I watch it again, this time with sound. Now I feel the urgency of the moment. That numbness I felt at first glance fades.Â
It is only with sound that I understand, not through comprehension of language, that the men are in shock. The child is in shock. He is completely awake and yet perhaps a quirk of biology has not yet told him he is in pain. It is only a 30 second video. We donât know what the child may be experiencing now.Â
This viewing is instructive to me as it tells me I am at a point where an initial silent image is not enough to communicate. I am not uncaring when I saw the child with bloody stumps below his torso, I am simply not understanding.Â
It takes time, and sound, for me to take in the horror and the tragedy. What does it take for you?














