The Devil of Jedburgh
It takes a special sort of ego to build a headless statue of yourself and stick it in the loch. Also, does it look like the statue is supposed to be holding a sword but someone's nicked it to you?
Please note that we can tell this is set in Romance Scotland from the off because it looks like it's about to rain on the lovely miniature house.
Raised on rumours of The Devil of Jedburgh, Breghan McAllen doesn't want an arranged marriage to the beast. The arrogant border laird is not the romantic, sophisticated husband Breghan dreams of—despite the heat he stirs within her.
In need of an heir, Arran has finally agreed to take a wife, but when he sees Breghan's fragile beauty, he's furious. He will not risk the life of another maiden by getting her with child. Lust prompts him to offer a compromise: necessary precautions, and handfasting for a year and a day, after which Breghan will be free. For a chance to control her own future, Breghan makes a deal with the Devil.
Passion quickly turns to love, but Arran still has no intention of keeping the lass, or making her a mother. He loves her too much to lose her. But when a treasonous plot threatens queen and country, Breghan has to prove only she is woman enough to stand by his side.
It's a pet peeve of mine that Laird is not the Scottish word for Lord. A quick google led me to the fact that this book is set in 1665, and the bloke in charge of Jedburgh was Lord Jedburgh - whose name was actually John Kerr, 3rd Lord Jedburgh. My search was prompted in order to be certain that before I got on my high horse I was actually right to get on my high horse, and I was right, so let's get a leg up and into the saddle - LAIRD IS NOT A QUAINT SCOTTISH VERSION OF THE WORD LORD THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT WORDS THAT MEAN TWO DIFFERENT THINGS oh good, that feels better.
Anyway, I can see why Breghan might not want to marry John Arran Kerr, what with his implied ability to commit maiden-murder, presumably with his giant offspring, no doubt conceived during surprisingly tender and extremely orgasmic sex. The whole notion is distinctly off-putting, but beyond that, one thing is clear. Handfast marriage in 17th Century Scotland was banned (by the Church of Scotland in 1575), and although civil authorities were recognising informal marriage in front of witnesses there is NO WAY anyone of rank was handfasting for marriage, much less as a trial of marriage with full consummation. Any heir born in this fashion would be illegitimate, and any mother of such a child - well, she's not going to do well in getting married again after the year-and-a-day is up. No-one is going to care that precautions were taken (I very much hope that there's a description of Arran tying his condom on, but it may be forlorn as that appears to be an Italian thing) because of lust. The Kirk is VERY CLEAR ABOUT LUST BEING A SIN. Also, and I very sincerely mean this, fuck you, Arran. Your lust means you'll trap this young woman in a dishonourable pseudo-marriage, but you don't mean to marry her properly and "keep" her? Arran has got to be one of the worst heroes ever, and I've read books where we're invited to admire the restraint of men who realise that the solution to their lustful thoughts is forcing the act upon her, but that they will choose not to do that because they're not the worst. And we now know who is, DON'T WE ARRAN? The bar is so low that Arran clearly tripped on it and fell into hell.
ALSO he is trying to rescue Mary, Queen of Scots, which means not only all of the above but he's also apparently USELESS.
GET IT TOGETHER, ARRAN.
Oh yeah, and Breghan isn't a real Scottish name.














