i've drawn them before, but i'll never say no to drawing more :D - after some hand-to-hand training - at the gala (+bonus lois and selina)

Die Tatsache, dass es eine Berufs-ID hat und als Hilfstätigigkeit beschrieben wird, schockt mich meisten.

i tried to make it online/no download no login as much as possible; a "⚘" means its beginner friendly/good place to start

first wave;

her protection for women - jane anger, 1589

declaration of the rights of women and of the female citizen - Olympe de Gouges, 1791

a vindication of the rights of woman - Mary Wollstonecraft, 1792 ⚘

letters on the equality of the sexes - sarah grimke, 1837 

the times that try mens souls - maria weston chapman, 1837

what time of night it is - sojourner truth, 1853

the destructive male - elizebeth cady stanton, 1868 ⚘

Sex Slavery - Voltairine de cleyre, 1890

woman church and state - Matilda jocyln gage, 1890 ⚘

second link for WC&S (easier to read)

rosa luxemberg library, 1894-1919

clara zetkin archive, 1896-1926

the womans bible - Elizabeth cady Stanton, 1895

alexandra kollontai archive, 1908-1946

the hypocrisy of puritanism - emma goldman, 1911

the second sex - simone de Beauvoir, 1949  ⚘

women as a minority group - Helen Mayer Hacker, 1951

second wave;

the bell jar - sylvia plath, 1963 ⚘

the feminine mystique - betty Friedan, 1963 ⚘

women: the longest revolution - juliet mitchell, 1966

no more miss america - robin morgan, 1968 ⚘

scum manifesto - valerie solanas, 1968 ⚘

sexual politics - kate millet, 1968

the church and the second sex - mary daly, 1968 

redstockings manifesto - 1969  ⚘

women and the myth of consumerism - ellen willis, 1969

liberation from eros - mitsu tanaka, 1970

for the equal rights amendment - shirley chisholm ,- 1970

the bitch manifesto - jo freeman, 1970 ⚘

the dialectic of sex; the case for feminist revolution - shulamith firestone, 1970 

the female eunuch - germaine greer, 1970 ⚘

the liberation of black women - pauli murray, 1970

the first sex - Elizabeth gould davis, 1971

the feminization of society - yoko ono, 1972

what educated women can do - indira gandhi, 1974

when god was a woman - merlin stone, 1976

women, race & class - angela davis, 1981 ⚘

patriarchy and accumulation in the global scale - maria mies, 1986

third wave;  

black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment - patricia hill collins, 1990

the sexual politics of meat - carol j. adams, 1990

men, women and chainsaws; gender in the modern horror film - carol j glover, 1992

naree - humayun azad 1992

the war against women - marylin french, 1992 ⚘

ecofeminism and the sacred - carol j adams, 1993 

fourth wave;

20 years ago, the main focus of TRAs was destroying bisexuality as a sexuality to get their full foot in the door when it came to the LGB, and they successfully astroturfed the war between "truscum" and "tucutes" to normalise everything trans and make everyone believe that "trans women were women," that pronoun use prevented self-hatred and suicide, and that TIMs deserved kindness and safety in female spaces.

(For the young people, "truscum" (or "transmedicalists") were the ones that said "being trans is real and it's because of the medical condition, gender dysphoria," and they often shared pseudoscience that TIMs were supposedly born with literal "female brains," like it was a disability. The "tucutes" were those that said that saying that someone had to have gender dysphoria to be trans was transphobic and classist because of a lack of access to doctors for the diagnosis. The "tucutes" overlapped with self-diagnoses of DID, BPD and autism and tended to be younger people caught in the first wave of social contagion thanks to the sudden push of glamourising transness online, whereas the "truscum" were the supposed adults who cared about science and fact before anything else to manipulate older people into buying the TRA nonsense.)

The manufactured "truscum vs tucute" debate was an astroturfed debate to make everyone believe that out of the two sides the "truscum" were correct, and that, plus the destruction of bisexuality, was the beginning of what TRAs are today. It was all on purpose, because there was only the "truscum vs tucute" sides of the argument ever accepted, all to silence anyone who questioned the growing TRA narrative as "far right transphobes."

Ironically, the "truscum" were the ones that made their scientific misogyny mainstream, which has evolved into accepted ordinary misogyny, and then they merged with the "tucutes" anyway, because gender dysphoria is trotted out against some arguments, and then "someone is trans if they say they're trans and they don't need to do anything else" is trotted out every other time.

Do not believe any lies that there was a "trans community" that was once reasonable, but then later taken over by abusers and predators. The community was always like this. They are extremely organised and have been pushing for this for decades. The 2000s weren't the beginning, but social media was the spark that they needed to get as far as they have come.

The only "reasonable trans people" are the ones that will say and do anything to charm and guilt-trip others into affirming their "identities." They still desperately want to cross boundaries and destroy our language, but for them, it's entirely personal, and they will throw every other TIM and TIF under the bus to get what they want.

As I've said before, I genuinely feel for the vulnerable people who have been swept up in the TRA movement, and who identify as trans/NB because they've been tricked and manipulated, but the movement itself has always been designed to reach where we are now.

I finally understand what she meant

the planet is desensitized to female sexual abuse, it happens everywhere after all, we are constantly exposed to it, it's woven into our subconscious, into our very existence, it is seen as something normal, natural, inevitable even

libfems and male apologists will try and tell you that male rape victims have it harder than female ones.

propaganda.

men getting raped has always been seen as more abhorrent, because it's seen as unnatural. with women, it's something inherent to their experience and dismissed as unremarkable