Mondoki Slider

Society doesn’t tell men they’re tainted or dirty when they lose their virginity it praises them.

Society’s never PAID men’s families for their virginity…NOR HAS IT EVER PROMISED WOMEN who do good that they’ll get to “have sex with a 1000 virgin men” when they go to heaven.

*OP HERE*

See before you start whining about how it shames men for not conquering women….

How about you research what patriarchy is…and how the original caption totally covered all the ‘damage’ that happens to the precious men in the world.

Men wouldn’t have the numbers to gang rape anymore, and the ones that would be left alive wouldn’t do that anyway because they’d have to pass stringent tests. I don’t think women even need males to continue the species anymore, I mean we’ve got sperm banks now.

Personally, I long to be a part of an environment of complete sisterhood, where women are freed from the constraints of male dominance and can work together to create something better than what we have now. Female solidarity is powerful…imagine the kind of world that we could create for ourselves. It might be just a dream at the moment, but it’s an inspiring dream, and one worth pursuing.

As women, we need spaces to self-actualise and communicate ideas away from the scrutiny of males. Lesbians have always been the leaders and innovators in the struggle for female rights, and a move towards lesbian separatism could only empower all women as a consequence of lesbian voices becoming amplified. We might not have the resources to go big right now (although I still daydream about winning the lottery and starting a lesbian commune somewhere) but practicing separatism in our daily lives, prioritising our lesbian sisters, supporting female-centred businesses and organisations, being seen to actively criticise patriarchy and male supremacy, these all go a long way towards the eventual goal of total lesbian separatism.

The unfortunate fact is that lesbian separatism is no longer a hypothetical ideal, imo - it’s imperative if we are to survive as a community.

Feminists have been trying to work within patriarchal power structures to reform male supremacy since the second wave, and it has become increasingly clear that this approach just isn’t working. Patriarchal society continues to attack the rights of women and seeks to undermine previous feminist gains wherever possible. The LGBTQA community ignores the needs of lesbians, and seeks to coercively redefine our sexuality to the point that we are effectively erased as homosexuals. The pushback against female autonomy is escalating beyond anything that we could have prepared for - from abortion rights, to the rights to safe spaces, to the right to determine for ourselves what the words ‘woman’ and ‘lesbian’ even mean, we are under attack from every angle. The support structures that feminists and lesbians started with the second wave have been eroded into nonexistence. While lesbianism as an inborn sexuality will always be around, the fact is that we are dying as a community and a political force. It is vital that we regroup and focus on reprioritising ourselves, and that’s where I believe that the need for lesbian separatism arises.

It’s not all bad, the remaining 10 percent will be used for breeding.

This is, of course, the logical conclusion of Feminism. Most Feminists, on some level, agree with her they just don’t have the courage to acknowledge that this is where their ideology leads them to.

Most Feminists are sort of like Nazis who know that their ideology demands that the Jews be liquidated but don’t have the actual courage to openly talk about it. But that doesn’t stop them from being Nazis. Or Feminists.

Most of us in the Anti-Feminist community have known about Femitheist (and the nature of Feminism) for a while so this is nothing new.

What’s surprising isn’t that this person exists, or that the interview happened or that Feminism is like this.

What’s surprising is the degree to which the Interviewer is on HER side.

I mean even if we ignore that the tagline involves a joke about a holocaust unprecedented in human history, reading the article the interviewer doesn’t actually challenge her at all. In any capacity.

Compare the EXACT SAME INTERVIEWER interviewing a White Supremacist…

This is how he describes the woman that wants to remove 90% of men from the population, the Feminist Supremacist:

Two years later she is an emergent cult leader, a ball-stepping villainess, or clear-thinking realist – depending who you ask.

Now here’s that self same interviewer describing the White Supremacist:

Kyle Hunt is a reclusive man, paranoid enough to log my IP details when I contact him.

Neo-paganism, check. Kyle imagines himself some kind of all-odds hero of the bad-odds white race, envisioning this article as a grandiose Portrait of a Man titled “Kyle Confronts Cultural Marxism.”

I decided to nudge his superiority complex into asserting itself in a way I suspected would work

Are we noticing ANY kind of bias here kids? When it came to the Feminist that wanted to kill off 90% of men in some we get nothing but fawning acceptance.. when it comes to a guy that is pro-white we get absolute contempt.

I came across this pretty amazing article: Feminist Science Fiction Is the Best Thing Ever by Claire L. Evans on Motherboard (part of Vice).

It also has a good reading list if you’re into feminist science fiction. (I’m glad to see Margaret Atwood made their list):