I love how seriously you took the Radqueer God thing and ran with it, when it was mostly me poking fun at an anti-endo saying something really stupid, and asserting that I was treated as a literal God by a community that I'm not even a part of.
Really shows how desperate you all are.
But yeah, that's something else I forgot to mention! After I criticized your hate subreddit's hit list, you guys started "deepdiving" my account through years of content to find reasons to attack me and put me on your hit list!
Surprised you didn't toss in the part where I bragged about teaching people to dissociate and hallucinate.
I mean, you guys browsed the Sophiecourse tag, right? It's the second one over if your browse by top. And I even went through all the trouble of sending that anon to Dia asking what "lie" I told just so Dia would post that screenshot to try to prove me wrong, and I could reblog it and help solidify that into the syscourse topic of the week.
they were not changed for you specifically.
Right. Of course. Let's do a comparison real quick of the people on your hatesub's hit list?
TheASystem has 1.1 Million followers on TikTok.
DissociaDID has 1.17 Million followers on Youtube.
Frgmntdpsyche has 179.5 thousand followers on TikTok.
Then there's me with my measly 1,800 followers on my small Tumblr blog.
But sure, totally wasn't changed for me specifically. π
So wanted to add that you were approved for the list not due to your follower count but specifically due to the extremely dangerous things you have been proven to support and encourage
Sorry. No. That's not how that works.
The entire rationalization for okaying this in the first place was that it would be allowed as long as long you were targeting "public figures." Remember???
From u/Goat_Alter's original post:
The entire reasoning for the 10k follower rule was that the moderators decided only "public figures" would be accepted.
If you're saying that follower count and popularity aren't a reason I was added, then it sounds like you're admitting that I wouldn't actually qualify as a public figure. And your whole hit list is just completely arbitrary and can target anyone you don't like for any reason you decide.
I also wanted to mention that the specific person you have been mocking for their "reading comprehension" in previous posts suffers from multiple TBIs and is genuinely offended you mocked them for their reading comprehension
You seem to be referencing this post.
Okay, let's talk reading comprehension.
Here was the full quote:
(From this post)
Alright class, can anyone tell me how to use "such as"
Funny how you ignore that I only mentioned reading comprehension because of the one user's "reading comprehension has never been higher" remark:
As far as I'm concerned, they made it fair game.
Actually, do you REALLY want to be arguing that criticizing reading comprehension is ableist? Have you ever done a search of "reading comprehension" in that server of yours?
You know what they say about throwing stones in glass houses, right?
(Context: This was about Jennifer Freyd who was a CSA survivor who has never reported ritual abuse. I swear everyone in that server who attacks people's reading comprehension is projecting.)
I believe that last one is from u/Goat_Alter too, the r/systemscringe mod who made posts announcing their hit list! Wild isn't it?
(And also again feels like projecting. It's true that I have repeatedly said it's an r/systemscringe server. As far as I recall I've never said it's an "official" server for the subreddit. But it was promoted in the sub, links directly to the sub, and shares multiple moderators with it.)
Anyway, moving on from pointing out your massive hypocrisy... because lets face it, none of you have enough morals or standards to care...
If you actually read my post, I make it clear that I don't actually think it's a reading comprehension issue. At least by the point they were misquoting the sources.
I can fully accept that they have a disability that makes it hard to comprehend some text. I even acknowledge that this would be an easy mistake to make.
I... have a much harder time believing that their disability causes them to quote something verbatim while conveniently cutting off parts of the same sentence that would contradict what they're saying.
At that point, they're not making a mistake anymore. They're obfuscating facts to appear as if they're in the right.
