Copyright issues can be very tricky to deal with sometimes. Some people don’t like when other people use their work to make other artwork but sometimes there is nothing that they can do. According to the reading that we read for this class as long as you manipulate an image enough to where artistically it is shaped into a new image, then you can use that piece in your own artwork.
Take for example the Obama “Hope” picture that was taken by a press photographer and then manipulated by Fairey into a new image. They didn’t even know that it was the same photograph for two years but they still decided to sue him. Obviously though the image had been manipulated in an artistic way and it looked like a completely other image so they were not able to sue him.
I think that by allowing artists to use images as long as they manipulate them it opens the door to more variety of images and for more artists to come into the field with different ideas in mind. Collages, Photoshop images, propaganda and many more would be harder and some impossible to do if you could only go by the pictures you have taken.
Music is a big topic when it comes to copyright issues with all of the new techno/dubstep genres that are starting to get popular. Some of the artist that don’t pay to use the songs in their remixes could get in a lot of trouble with major record company’s but it is also a big argument that if you manipulate the song enough it should be fine to use especially when it’s a whole mix of songs and sounds put together.
Copyrights are definitely something that we need to have in our society. When you work hard and put a lot of effort to make something you want to make sure that no one else takes credit for your work. With that in mind there comes a point where if its manipulated far enough, it is no longer your work and someone else has put a lot of time and effort to make it different and the copyright laws should have no effect on it anymore because it’s a completely new work of another artist.