art is more revealing as opposed to causative of problematic notions. the potential promotion and reinforcement is what becomes a complex conversation to me bc ultimately people still distort and see what they see, what they want to see, because of how they already see things, so how do u even reckon with that? everyone ultimately does interpret art through a personal projection of life experiences and beliefs. do u obsessively try to predict and address anything that could ever be potentially twisted into ammunition for something? maybe even the contrary of what u r trying to say? do u defang and overcorrect everything? do u avoid all risks or give up even trying to grapple something in a challenging and meaningful way? i think that kind of thinking will lead to a lot of uninteresting art

















