I see what you're saying, but you're actually talking about something different.
The "white people, I hate you" post isn't the type of post that OP's referring to. I know you're not trying to strawman here, but it's important to recognize that by jumping to that example, you're demonstrating further OP's point in action. It's driven by panic and defensiveness in an attempt to distance yourself from the white users being discussed here, either by finding some way to differentiate yourself from them or - by thinking that was the type of post OP meant - putting it back on OP for having 'put you' in a 'difficult if not impossible situation'.
A better example is, "I'm so pissed some racist bullshit happened to me, and I am always seeing this from white people."
With these posts, white people on Tumblr would be happy to reblog it if it just said, "I'm so pissed some racist bullshit happened to me." Sometimes they reblog it in solidarity, sometimes they express outrage, sometimes they give advice (unsolicited), sometimes they apologize on behalf of all white people, sometimes they're shocked this could ever happen, sometimes they hijack it to make it about a supposedly similar issue that's removed from race, sometimes they tell other people to knock it off... Whatever. They recognize the injustice and they have enough of a reaction to reblog and interact with it.
But the second the post includes the, "... and I am constantly seeing this from white people" part, they don't interact. The people who would've happily said, "Hey other white people, don't do that," suddenly won't touch the post because now it feels 'too real' or 'too pointed' or 'too personal'. The people who would've agreed that this was some racist bullshit now feel like any acknowledgement of that is 'adding to the problem.' The people who'd jump in to give unsolicited advice now suddenly think their advice isn't being requested (irony of ironies). In short, every convenient reason to not engage with the post pops up, because these types of posts point out who actually caused this problem, and they see themselves reflected enough to be too uncomfortable to engage with it. Despite the fact that the victim of it had to live with it, and again, despite the fact that these people would've reblogged it "if only it hadn't extrapolated that one racist person into a generalized observation of white people's behaviour in this situation - because now that's talking about me, and surely I didn't do that, so why am I being blamed? That's mean! I better leave them alone - I don't want to get caught up in this mess. I sympathize, but I am not equipped to handle whatever's going on."
And this is called the "Right to Comfort": a pillar of white supremacy.
Take this very post as an example: you wrote your reply as carefully and respectfully as you could, because that's a bar you felt was set in order to interact with this. What part made you feel like it required that much work? Typically, it's the "I noticed white users on Tumblr..." that makes every white user suddenly very, very concerned that interacting with it is treading on dangerous territory, as opposed to how they'd be if it was generalized as, "I noticed users on Tumblr..." It's not even the later part saying, "... racism from white Tumblr users," that sets this reaction off, because most of the time, white users can rationalize that as, "Oh, those other users. The bad ones." Then happily go on to reblog and chime in and feel like they're 'allowed' to participate.
But when it's talking about something white users in general do, now it's suddenly too specific, and now it needs to be cushioned by something to help those white users invent the emotional distance between that image of themselves versus the 'Bad White People'. Like "I noticed some white users" would've instantly made this post more 'comfortable' to interact with, because then every white user could say, "Oh, but not me! :)" Take away the word 'some,' and now - like you said - it comes across as "something you weren't meant to see," even though it's quite literally addressed for you to see it. 🤷🏽♀️ It now becomes uncomfortable.
And now think of everyone who thought it was too much work to write any kind of reply (because clearly this was a private matter that they dare not get entangled in), and moved on, all because the post dared to suggest they might be one of the 'white users' referred to in this post. If only it had meant other users, they would've absolutely agreed with how obvious the disparity was.
And of this could be avoided if only two things weren't embedded in the world's society:
A white user's need to feel like they have to be welcomed and invited to participate,
A white user's insistence that the only way to participate is to be freely encouraged to talk, leave tags, pontificate, or apologize. To do something to mark their participation, instead of just silently nodding in understanding - or at least in a "Damn that sucks" recognition - of what the point was.
If someone said not to reblog a post out of common courtesy, that person doesn't speak for every single person in the world, and that post isn't representative of every type of post there is. Even if it was, okay, cool, you deleted the post. Move on. 🤷🏽♀️ Sometimes you forget a person's name, and then you go, "My bad, I meant XYZ." You don't decide not to use names again ever just in case you say the wrong one. But that's what white users do with posts saying they (even just generalized) are one of the white users being referred to.
Remember: when you're waffling over it because you're worried we're gonna, like, attack you, you've gotta start to wonder why you're uncomfortable and why you think we are doing something to you. What are you planning to do (talk? tag? silently reblog?) and what do you expect the result to be (violently cancelled? banned by every racialized person? embarassed for half a second before you go 'oops my bad')? Why is that your assumption? <- and why does that reaction so often lead to treating these posts like they're a Saw trap?
... this was also - um...
... not a great time to quote Malcom X, given the broader context of what OP said and what you wrote... 😅
That's the bat into the hornet's nest, 'cause I found it condescending to choose a famous Black activist to pull a quote about the violent and lethal racism that Black people experience at the hands of white people IRL to use in bolstering your own (albeit intended with good faith) point that, "Racialized people make it hard for white people to feel welcome on their posts."
gracieabrams
turnnoffyourmind
prguitarman
amandla
dailybridgerton
blakekathryn
tangentwithtanner
vaporwave
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
baratheonpilled
