Good Omens S3 - One scene that screams 'they are married' ❤️🔥
Bonus:
😇 He's so happy and proud to be there with his beloved Demon 😈

roma★

if i look back, i am lost
tumblr dot com

★
AnasAbdin


sheepfilms
will byers stan first human second
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi

JBB: An Artblog!

titsay
Acquired Stardust
todays bird
🪼

⁂
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from India

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
@marchellasunflake
Good Omens S3 - One scene that screams 'they are married' ❤️🔥
Bonus:
😇 He's so happy and proud to be there with his beloved Demon 😈

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
you know what fucking kills me? all major historical events that happened in our universe (the supposed new universe) also happened in the original universe.
we know that covid happened because the lockdowns were the reason Maggie was behind on rent (+ the whole lockdown audio bit, if you want to treat that as canon). the French Revolution, WW2, the Spanish Inquisition, climate change all happened. Shakespeare, Queen, the Velvet Underground, Shostakovich and David Bowie happened. hell, even on a much smaller-stakes scale, our version of the M25 still looks like Crowley's version.
the universe still worked out the same exact way. what was the point of their sacrifice then? no more cosmic meddling? we've ended up with the same exact thing anyway, so either Heaven and Hell were never that important because it's all humanity's doing (oh hello Book Omens/S1) , or the universe is just so inert that the whole "once you get rid of God you gain free will" thing is just blatantly Not True
"but humanity is now free to exist without the influences from Heaven or Hell!!!" yeah and everything still worked out the same way so ultimately Heaven and Hell never had much of a hand in anything
"but humanity being in control is very Pratchett!!!" yes, but killing the whole universe just to prove that point isn't. the death of 8 billion people was just a device to prove that humanity is capable of both beauty and horror? "sin, young man, is when you treat people like things."
I dunno man, this ending is fucking bleak
friendly reminder that aziraphale made crowley smile in rome when he realized he was in a foul mood
that he blushed when he described crowley as a wily adversary (keeps me on my toes)
that he smiled when he realized the bentley was back without a scratch after having blown up
that he refused crowley a suicide pill
that he kept an eye on crowley for 26 years after 1941, then sought him out and gave him the holy water so that he didn't have to get it himself. but i can't have you risking your life. not even for something dangerous. if we must quote it then at least let's quote it right.
that he went to hell for crowley and made sure they wouldn't bother him anymore
that he only ever cared about crowley not being destroyed
that no way aziraphale didn't check on crowley in three years
friendly reminder that aziraphale would never give up crowley without a fight, not even if crowley asked
- What did you even tell that artist?
- I wasn't...I didn't!!! I was simply trying to get Gabriel off our backs by-by planting evidence of our rivalry!
- Uh-huh
- I didn't think they'd draw me looking like a strongman!! Or...or quite so hairless...
-That is a shame...

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I don’t think Aziraphale’s love for Crowley was is the most predictable thing in the universe.
I think it's the opposite, actually.
Yes, Aziraphale is an angel, he loves, that’s what he does. But he’s not supposed to love a demon. Because of what he is, of who he is, he struggled with his feelings for Crowley for millennia. And yet, each time they met, he made the choice to speak with him, to protect him, to stay, to bond - to love.
In a universe in which angels and demons are supposed to be hereditary enemies, an angel chose a demon, over and over again (with a few notable exceptions, but we all know why - and he still loved him).
Messy? Oh, yes.
Silly? How can such a relationship, built on trust and affection, be silly?
Predictable? More like ineffable.
I don't understand people who talk about them making some beautiful sacrifice at the end of GO3. Answer me this: if it was supposed to be a beautiful and noble sacrifice, then why did they beat Crowley down so badly, the whole time, that his fucking Book of Life page was "heart broken, world broken, what's the point of anything"? Why did they take the Bentley away and make him sleep in an alley? Why did they write it so that when Aziraphale finally does show up, he doesn't even show concern for him, just asks for help (and even have Mrs Sandwich spell it out for us, in case we were too dense to notice on our own)? A sacrifice is, by definition, giving up something of value to you. Crowley had no miracles, no beloved Bentley, nowhere to go. Aziraphale had essentially abandoned him, and that whole mess was not resolved at all (although it could have been, quickly and easily, from a writing standpoint). But no. The writers very clearly wanted Crowley to be at rock fucking bottom and stay there.
Why?
It's not a sacrifice if you believe you have nothing left.
Heart broken. World broken. What's the point of anything.
Explain to me how in any universe that is a beautiful sacrifice, and not a horrifying, hopeless suicide.
What the unholy FUCK were they thinking. What were they trying to do with this. I need answers.
Why was the whole thing framed as if Crowley was the - romantic and devoted one even in his pain because he kept an eye on the bookshop? Oh what noble sacrifice.
When Aziraphale was the one who gave up everything just so he could try and avoid their dying horribly (or living in a far worse way forever)?
Why was Aziraphale deemed the guilty one? Why did Crowley never as much as hinted at being sorry for leaving him for years alone?
What happened to Mr "I won't leave you on your own"?
Aziraphale succeeded and got not a single word of thanks or appreciation. No. He is constantly blamed and shamed and questioned and criticised. "And how's that working out?"
Fuck off Crowley. He saved your sorry ass from eternity in a burning goo. And you couldn't even run a bookshop. And not pick up rents.
Good Omens and Aziraphale Scorn
The idea of having a more Crowley tinted lenses on for S2 seemed like it should pay off in S3 when Aziraphale's hope and rationality and hard work will be rewarded and acknowledged in the end. Now it just looks sinister because the good and kind angel is just stupid and pointless isn't he. Everywhere I look, there are metas about how he's not learned anything and should have listened to Crowley. Cynicism won.
And yet, it was Aziraphale who saved them anyway. Yes, I expected Crowley and he will renew the Universe without Heaven and Hell, but dissolving into nothing is still a better fate (imo) than eternity apart - especially if God would be cruel enough to keep them separated and Crowley would suffer the demon's fate of the Second Coming.
My point is, Aziraphale's tenaciousness is what got them to the finish line. Everything was always stacked against them. And Aziraphale kept them safe. And alive.
Pushing Aziraphale into the side character / love interest / reluctant silly girlfriend / hardworking wife who does everything and gets blamed for everything too while the poor husband drinks and mopes - - it's clear what NG thinks of the kindness and determination and self sacrifice of Aziraphale and many AFAB people in the world. Their suffering does not matter. It's just a means to an end of the glorious hero. The end that does not even make sense in the end. And fell very flat for me.
To protect the world from devastation
To unite all peoples within our nation
To denounce the evils of truth and love
To extend our reach to the stars above
Aziraphale!
Crowley!
Team Aziracrow!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Omniscience ≠ No Free Will
If God already knows what you will do, is it still really a choice? TL;DR: What would be the point of running a universe where everything is fixed? I think the GO universe was more like an ant farm than a computer program.
Knowledge is not necessarily causation - knowing something will happen is not the same thing as forcing it to happen. The theological idea is usually that God knows everything because she exists outside of time. Or that's the theory anyway. It would be pretty boring to start a deterministic universe where everything happens exactly as expected (like in my opinion, the universe Asa and Anthony seemed to get?).
I'm saying this because I've seen people discuss that God "shipped" Aziraphale and Crowley or that she planned that they will fall in love. I don't think so.
God says Aziraphale’s love was predictable. But honestly, I would say that too.
Not because Aziraphale was compelled, but because this is who he is. Because of how deeply he cares. Because of the way he always admired Crowley, from the beginning.
If I know what someone will do because I understand them deeply, that does not mean I am making them do it.
The - you could never have had him - was on her though. She could have stopped the farce with the two sides and the 6000 years and the animosity and Aziraphale at some point even hoped she might if he can reason with her.
But she's not the reasonable kind I don't think, nor trustworthy - which is why I absolutely do not understand Crowley's choice to trust she will fulfil his wish.
No matter the fear, doctrine, punishment, or uncertainty, Aziraphale kept choosing to love Crowley. Freely. As freely as anyone can choose to love. Even when people accuse him of not loving well enough.
I think Aziraphale did everything he could.
He kept them alive. He gave Crowley a bright spot in his life. A home. An anchor.
Aziraphale’s love is almost the opposite of determinism.
It’s a moral constancy via a free choice because the safer option would have been to stay away. To forget Crowley. To follow rules. To obey orders. And that's not who Aziraphale ever was. Aziraphale always went as far he had to with Heaven and no further. Just like Crowley said. He did what he could otherwise.
God created Aziraphale though (and Crowley) so aren't they just her dolls to pull strings on?
Well. No. Unless she created a fully deterministic universe as I said. (Which, to be fair, is something philosophers explore even without God. Just ask Laplace’s Demon - and I'd love to explore this but this is already getting long.)
The Ineffables have a discussion regarding Adam right? Will they be able to influence who he is via upbringing? What actually shapes us? Is it genetics? Is it the people around us? Is it just fate?
I think Good Omens lands firmly on environment and connection mattering more than anything. What ultimately cements Adam’s decision is his love for his friends, his family, and Tadfield itself.
But Adam still made a choice. The three card shuffle made a mistake because Crowley did. And Adam refused to end the world. He was offered absolute power. The chance to rule everything. To destroy everything and begin again.
And he said no!
He chose humanity instead. He chose trying to make things better rather than throwing the world away.
(Do I have to bring in here how nonsensical I see the ending of GO3 again?)
Aziraphale may have been created compassionate, curious, gentle, loving, but those traits don’t force every action. And anyway, he's also sassy and a bit of a bastard, stubborn and fierce and disobedient.
What would be the point of running a universe where everything is fixed? I think the GO universe was more like an ant farm than a computer program. And that's why it was going off kilter. And why GO3 makes no sense.
ArchSiblings S2!
(BTS pictures from Gloria Abianyo's IG)
Inktober Day 4 - Dodge
Crowley: I'd take a bullet paintball for you
Aziraphale: BET
To the World! 🥂💖
Happy B-day, TV series 🥳
Aziraphale, misogyny and the female character treatment
Say we take a basic premise of a romantic film: A girl is wooed by a bad boy for example. And she is a good girl, from a good, proper family and everything so she refuses his advances. This goes on through his various ploys to entertain and romance her, do things for her etc etc and frustrates us as the audience because we can see the bad boy is actually good (unlike the gang he's in), her family is oppressive and holding her back and that she (deep down) cares for him (if only she was brave enough to admit it to herself) and so we want her to open her eyes and say she is actually in love with him cos her life will be so much better should she (finally) give in and run away with him.
Familiar? Reasons Aziraphale is not her and the analogy does not fit (but that I so often see in metas and takes about her):
Aziraphale always knew her family is shit. Or at least longer than Crowley did. She was already anxious in Before the Beginning about what she thought Angel!Crowley could and could not say or do without getting into trouble.
She knows Crowley is good. She never doubted him. Whatever he says or does or pretends to do or must do for his job. Aziraphale knows Crowley is inherently good where it counts and would always do good if he can.
She knows she's in love - I mean we can argue about when each realised this and also when each realised the other loves them back, but they both know. And they both love. And they both long to be together. Aziraphale is not ashamed of her feelings nor hiding or suppressing them for fear they are wrong or immoral or other bs like that.
Aziraphale doesn't need to overcome her love for her family/employer and finally make the leap to be with Crowley. They simply can't leave their bosses without punishment. Neither of them. They live in a dictatorship with nowhere to go. And just because Crowley experienced both sides, doesn't give him some huge insight that Aziraphale completely lacks. Both places are awful. Their separation isn’t about fear of societal judgment (or Aziraphale's unwillingness to give up Heaven, being seen as good, being an angel - to what end, to Fall? I really don't know what takes like this want from her, it would not work anyway), it’s about survival in a system that won’t let them be together.
Aziraphale doesn't want to change Crowley. She never did. She asked for Crowley to come to Heaven as an angel because that was THE ONLY option she had for them to be together in any capacity at that point. It was NOT an attempt to “fix” him—it was a desperate bid for a way they could be together at all.
One thing I don't see as much anymore is the call for Aziraphale to change. Obviously she's pretty but she would be prettier if she lost those century old clothes maybe and started listening to something made after 1950? Be more cool to match Crowley? Less stuffy?
These kind of film premises are already pointless, offensive and make me roll my eyes, but to stick them all over Aziraphale and huff cos she doesn't do what the clever sexy man in dark clothes and sunglasses says she should - well that makes me angry.
And so do takes and mischaracterisations that ignore Aziraphale as silly, her worries as pointless or at least excessive - maybe she's just hysterical, you know? The one time she shows more emotion, in F15, she is so often completely ignored in her obvious distress just because Crowley is trying to confess his love or something at the same time and seemingly 'not getting through,' because Aziraphale is not reacting the way everyone expects. So many takes that always assume Crowley is right, no matter what. Even when he calls Aziraphale an idiot. If Crowley says that, it must be true. No matter that the book spells out in Terry's voice that the angel is extremely clever.
Aziraphale’s charm lies in her kindness, her love for books and knowledge, her whimsy, and her quiet courage. These qualities don’t make her naive—they make her resilient. She often hides how she truly feels, hides her grief, her pain, her true desires, hides what she really thinks; always always to protect herself and her beloved. She is often forced to say stuff she doesn't mean. To keep the one she loves and their fragile relationship safe. But where people seem to catch on with that on Crowley's side, they don't with Aziraphale. She is fierce when pushed and will defend the defenceless (humans) and the ones she loves (Crowley) to her last breath (whether she needs to breathe is irrelevant right now okay).
She loves her bookshop. She built this home, full of knowledge for herself and her demon and you can take this HC from my cold hands. That she was forced to leave it, only emphasises how little choice she had in Final 15. Good Omens has two main, equal characters; who are both gorgeous and complex and deep and neither is right or wrong or in need of saving or learning some huge lesson to get to their goal and be together. What needs to change is the world, the system they live in. And they will change it. P.S. Just to add, many, many (if not all) bad takes on Aziraphale are also bad takes on Crowley. They mischaracterise and misunderstand just how deeply and unconditionally he loves Aziraphale. How he adores her and understands and accepts her just as she is. He does not expect or want Aziraphale to change in any way. He knows why they are not together. And it's not Aziraphale's fault, it's because of circumstances, not because of her choices. Crowley would never ever want Aziraphale to suffer, he wouldn't expect her to come back from Heaven saying how sorry she is for what 'she has done', how stupid and blind she was and how he was always right. That's just not going to happen. ------------------------------------------ @tenok I simply must highlight the awesomeness you put in hashtags!! EVERYBODY please read:
Thank you sm for this!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The Shuttered Garden: How the Good Omens Finale Betrayed its Humanistic Roots
Text: Aivelin Illustration: a-ida
The series finale of Good Omens dropped this Wednesday, leaving the fandom shaken and in absolute distress. The audience reaction was immediate, driving the Rotten Tomatoes score for Season 3 down to a disappointing 36%. The online debate grew so heated and overwhelmed with grief that numerous fan accounts faced 24-hour social media bans for their highly emotional confessions.
Viewers are highly divided. While a fraction accepts the heavy ending as a necessary evil, the overwhelming sentiment across platforms is utter bewilderment and heartbreak: "These characters do not feel like the ones we grew to love in previous seasons!"
This raises painful, critical questions: Is this sudden shift in characterization a narrative misstep? Is the tragic, suicidal ending a harsh subversion of the original book, which famously promised a comforting happily ever after?
To find the answer, one must look closely at who held the creative reins for the scripts of Seasons 2 and 3. By analyzing the writing credits, clear and undeniable patterns emerge, linking these distressing plot choices directly to Neil Gaiman’s broader, often dark and subversive, body of work.
The Solitary Vision and the Realigned Mold
While the first season captured the shared spirit of Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s 1990 novel, the subsequent seasons belong to Gaiman’s solitary vision. When viewed alongside his wider world of storytelling, such as The Sandman, American Gods, and Stardust, the tragic fractures in Aziraphale and Crowley’s bond lose their surprise. Gaiman’s worlds are populated by immortal beings who are deeply fractured at best and cruel at worst. In these narratives, it is almost a rule that celestial entities will take advantage of the hearts that love them, turning devotion into a tool before abandoning those souls to a devastating fate.
Crucially, Gaiman always veils this emotional cruelty behind high-minded dilemmas. The act of abandonment is never framed as simple coldness; instead, it is masked as a profound moral crisis ("We cannot be together because I am a god and you are human"), a sacrifice of monumental importance ("I must leave our future to save my kingdom"), or an unyielding divine necessity. Even when Gaiman’s romances lack outward malice, they are consistently denied peace. In Stardust, the mortal husband passes away, leaving his immortal, celestial wife to endure eternity in silent, isolated grief. By transforming Aziraphale into a colder, more emotionally distant figure who abruptly leaves Crowley for a heavenly promotion, Gaiman is merely reshaping Good Omens to fit his favorite creative blueprint.
Deeply Pessimistic Parallels
Ultimately, the ending of Good Omens Season 3 and the conclusion of The Sandman reveal deeply pessimistic parallels. The Sandman closes with its protagonist suffering the consequences of his own rigid nature, forced by higher powers into self-destruction so that his kingdom might survive. In the wake of this death, the universe offers a surrogate replacement - a new entity stripped of the original’s memories, whom the remaining characters are forced to accept despite their lingering grief.
Aziraphale’s sudden, illogical decision to leap at Heaven’s offer mirrors this exact brand of narrative cruelty. Neither Aziraphale nor Crowley deserved to have their hard-won autonomy stripped away for the sake of a grandiose self-sacrifice.
A Profound Departure from Terry Pratchett
This shift represents a profound departure from the late Terry Pratchett’s fundamental worldview. Pratchett harbored a deep-seated aversion to suicide tropes and grand, sacrificial violence in fiction. His works respected the dignity of both life and death. In his narrative, the Apocalypse is defeated not through self-sacrifice or bloodshed, but by the quiet resilience and stubborn pragmatism of ordinary people. The first season beautifully honored this philosophy, as the Antichrist and a group of children stopped the Apocalypse through sheer, down-to-earth humanity.
The subsequent seasons discard this logic entirely, altering the very cosmology of the universe. In Season 1, God was an infallible, detached observer whose ineffable plan quietly empowered the right people at the right moment to prevent ruin. By Season 3, God is reframed as a petulant, semi-malicious entity capable of erasing existence on a whim.
Furthermore, while Pratchett and Gaiman likely brainstormed the concepts of the South Downs cottage and the conflict between Heaven, Hell and Earth together, Pratchett would never have designed an intentionally suicidal and destructive endgame. In his philosophy, survival is achieved through an attachment to mundane, earthly joys. In the first season, Crowley is saved from hellfire by his love for his car and his human-like imagination, while Aziraphale survives because of his eccentric, earthly devotion to collecting rare books.
Conclusion: Fanfiction or Harsh Reality
A true thematic continuation of both authors' visions would look radically different. It would find Aziraphale and Crowley left alone in a quiet bookshop for eternity, weaving their magical memories and shared love for humanity together to rewrite every lost book back into a brand-new universe. If that choice ultimately stripped them of their divinity and left them mortal, it would be a logical, bittersweet happily-ever-after within the sanctuary of a beautiful, earthly garden.
Instead, Gaiman has opted for character regression and profound emotional devastation. To pretend that Aziraphale's betrayal of Crowley and their martyrdom makes narrative sense within the established logic of Season 1 is an exercise in denial. Audiences are left with a stark choice: either view everything past the first season as high-budget, angst-driven fanfiction, or accept a harsher reality. The original, humanistic spirit of Good Omens died with Terry Pratchett, leaving behind a cold universe engineered for heartbreak.
Today is the day many saw season 3, so I'm reposting it with all replies and reblogs with comments in it. You may find some opinions and also under ao3 post https://archiveofourown.org/works/84905381/chapters/224114576#workskin
It just gets worse when you think about how the ending was sadistically designed to mess with the audience. That became crystal clear in the script excerpt from the scene at the end: "Crowley swallows. Will this be the second kiss, a declaration of love to match Aziraphale's?" NOPE! Neil Gaiman actively encouraged an expectation that they would have a happy ending, only to viciously tear the rug out from under us. Why? Why put them in this fucked up situation in a COMEDY? Well, no one should have trusted an abuser with writing their ending.
NG really said "I'll give you a kiss, but you won't want it", for season 2, and then he gave us the South Downs ending that no one wanted (though some have accepted or embraced it, happily for them).
In a story where funny twists or loopholes like "actually you're not my father" and "isn't the great plan also the ineffable plan?" saved the day before, there would have been countless different endings that could have stayed true to the ending that Pratchett allegedly wanted, without falling into NG's grim, sadistic, darkness.
💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔