dude the way goyische queer people talk about homosexuals and “deviants” being targeted by the third reich gives me the impression they wish there had been more queer victims….
Look for the goys the biggest tragedy about the Holocaust is that it happened to the Jews and they will never forgive us for this.
(Also they need to stop and ask WHY were the LGBTQIA+ targeted by the Nazis? There was a reason for this and it's not at all the same reason that American Evangelicals hate the LGBTQIA+)
The appropriate term to discuss this is, sadly, already extant. It is "Holocaust Envy" While Holocaust envy and appropriation has been attempted from every angle of the political spectrum from factory farming to abortion
There exists a phenomenon that we should call “Holocaust envy.” Namely, the term describing the murder of Jews is being used to describe other massacres, mass extinctions, and even activities like slaughtering animals for meat or abortions that eliminate large numbers of fetuses. The latter has been dubbed by some die-hard Catholics the “Holocaust of the Unborn.” Why do people use such a term? Well, it indicates the special significance of the phenomenon in question. In the modern world – at least in Western culture – it is (still) widely accepted that the murder of Jews during the war was an incredible horror, that the Holocaust should be commemorated, and that important lessons should be formulated on its basis. And it is this assessment, it seems to me, that becomes the reason for envy. The possibility of using the name “Holocaust” for another misfortune is supposed to suggest its unquestionable importance. The very use of this word, people who push it seem to think, is supposed to automatically bring the effect of placing a given massacre on the top shelf and to bring broad, international recognition. A good example of conscious propaganda in this spirit is seen in the proposal to refer to Polish losses during the Second World War, which were very heavy indeed, as the “Polocaust.” In 2018, it was proposed to create a Museum of the Polocaust. The annihilation of Polish Jews would be its fragment. So far, nothing has come of it, but who knows what else will hatch in the next stages of the official historical policy of one Polish government or another. All such attempts provoke opposition. However, it is not obvious what this objection, or rather indignation, is based on. It seems to be more than a result of the general observation that if we call all mass deaths “Holocaust,” the term loses its meaning; nothing will truly be a Holocaust anymore. I guess the opposition is mostly based on jealousy, Holocaust envy. In addition, calling some deaths “Holocaust” somehow ennobles them. The naming creates a different aura: it is not just any death, it is a Holocaust, something that everyone must respect.
I would contend that this new 21st century form is partially religiously derived. By which I mean it's used by ostensibly secular/progressive/leftist people in a way to create their own 'spiritual' mythos... which just happens to center Jewish dispossession, erasure and supercessionism while they lay claim to something that was, by its own bigoted formulation... centered on Jews.
As with the Nazis mentioned below, these ostensible secularists/Activists/whateverists are "taking biblical tradition seriously" SOLELY in that they need to 'take the Jewish THING/sympathy/origin to racists away from Jews.
If this is the correct reading of the intentions, we can see the Nazis as perversely “religious,” that is, taking biblical tradition seriously. It is true that they wanted to destroy it and replace it with their own Germanic mythology, but they did not ignore it as unimportant. Playing the role of God, replacing Him with Hitler and his party who represented the German nation and its gods, and giving in practice the role of the representatives of the highest authority to the local Nazis responsible for mass murder – this is the deepest sense of the project to murder all Jews. Making seemingly irrational moves that were detrimental to the war effort turns out to be the result of a different rationale, one derived from the logic of religious war in the strictest sense, namely a war waged against the God who favors the Jews, in the name of some other gods. Thus, if we believe the Holocaust to be unique, the reason is not so much the manner of death, the extent of the crime, the effect of the disappearance of hundreds of communities from the face of the earth, because all these circumstances can be encountered in other situations. The reason is that this genocide involved the Jews.
From the blog of Stanislaw Krajewski at The Times of Israel
