For example, she claims to hate fascism, but runs her spaces in ways that are deeply authoritarian.
If you can't understand the difference between authoritarianism and fascism, I'm sorry but you need to get off the internet and go touch some grass. If that confuses you, allow me to elaborate. WWII was won when the authoritarians beat the fascist. There was no liberal democracy there. It was all authoritarianism.
She purges anyone who disagrees, bans people over tiny infractions, and labels any form of dissent as harassment or stalking. That’s not community leadership—it’s tyranny under the guise of protection. She takes no responsibility for the kind of space she creates, even though she sets the tone herself. Everything bad is someone else’s fault. Everything good is due to her strength and resilience.
Looking at your page all you do is harass her. You're blog only exists as a place for targeted harassment against one you-tuber who said the cartoon you liked is bad. So I'm not very surprised that she blocks as much as she does. I looked at your posts for the last six months and did not find a single post that wasn't about her. Worst a good chunk of your posts were dead naming her.
And let’s not forget her hypocritical stances. She claims to be pro-autistic rights, but has expressed disdain for autistic people who “don’t mask,” because she finds masking easy. She has a diagnosed history (Asperger’s, reportedly), yet she has no patience for people who struggle differently than she does. Her default mode is, “If I can do it, so can you,” and when others can’t? She dismisses them. This isn’t just ignorance—it’s that same selfish impulse again. If your experience doesn’t validate hers, she sees it as an inconvenience.
No, there is a large group of people, especially amongst the autism speaks crowd, who decide they get to be assholes because they're neurodivergent. Think of House MD. He thinks he gets to be a miserable cunt because he's smarter than everyone. CD is an absolute cunt, but I don't think she ever blamed it on her autism, just her cunty personality. Respect.
Even her critiques of media operate under this self-centered lens. Her Owl House commentary is a perfect example: Luz, the main character, goes through a guilt spiral and depressive slump. Lily’s response? Zero compassion. In fact, she goes so far as to say Amity should leave her. Why? Because Luz’s sadness is inconvenient. This isn’t analysis—it’s projection. And it reflects the way Lily handles people in real life: she has no time for emotional needs that aren’t hers.
Now you're just lying. I'm not event going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you mean well.
Luz is the best character in the show. Its really unfortunate that she got relegated to the background because everyone making the show deluded themselves to think hunter was better. Luz's sadness is inconvenient. The writers forgetting that Luz's threat response was to fuck shit up, and change her into this passive character was annoying. She still is the best character at the beginning of the show and the best character at the end of the show. Its just sad that the show runners didn't have enough faith in Sara-Nicole Robles to give the character justice.
You know what. I've been following media personalities for a while now. I grew up wanting to marry Helena Bonham-Carter. My new crush is Tawny Newsome. Moviebob and Shamus Young have shaped more of my media understanding than anyone else in the world.
Yeah, I'm a fanboy. I know what my limits are. If someone tells me to back off and leave them alone, I don't take it as a personal insult. I don't find it offensive.
What I do find offensive, is you calling me a fanboy as an insult, and i find your blog is just a targeted harassment campaign.
I tried to talk to you and gave you the benefit of the doubt. Then I found out the only function of your blog is to harass a YouTuber.
I'm sorry she didn't tongue bath the cartoons you liked. Hopefully one day you'll be able to move past that.