So I want to compare two posts, one from Crimsonender and one from 4e3076.Â
The post from Crimson ender reads as follows: I was thinking about making a post saying “I think trans men and nonbinary people should be allowed to hunt baeddels for sport” but I knew it would be twisted to say I’m a transmisogynist for making a dark joke about a group of people that think I would be better off dead just for virtue of being assigned female at birth and daring to identify as something other than a girl. Painting trans men as the bad guys once again when baeddels are out here saying the most evil vitriolic things about us. Anyway that’s why I think trans men and nonbinary people should be allowed to hunt baeddels for sport. End quote.Â
I mainly want to focus on the last line of the post but I will talk about some of the rest of it as well. So to begin with I want to define baeddel as a term, it’s an old English word that has a debated definition but the general consensus is that the term means "gender non-conforming or effeminate man” it can also refer to intersex people, and the word is associated with another word, waepenwifestre that is defined as “a woman with a penis or masculine traits”. More recently it was used by TERFs to refer to trans activists, and within the last few years some transfeminists identified as baeddels. The wording of Crimsonender’s post makes it clear that he is using the more recent definition (although, even if he was using the old definition, that does not improve the content of the post). The next part I want to define is “I think trans men and nonbinary people should be allowed to…” Crimsonender is trans masc, so it’s clear that he is talking about himself, but the “should be allowed to” part is what I want to focus on, saying you should be allowed to do something suggests a desire to do so but not being allowed to, for example “I should be allowed to eat an entire cake” has the same meaning as “I want to eat an entire cake but I’m not allowed to”. And the last phrase to define is “hunt for sport” this is the easiest to define, sports hunting is killing an animal with no necessary reason such as survival. So if we plug our definitions into Crimsonender’s post we get this, “I want to kill transfeminists but I’m not allowed to”. For some reason, Crimsonender thinks that you need to twist his words to make him sound transmisogynistic but unless you think that twist means “define” I think he might be wrong with that point. As for his other point that “a group of people that think I would be better off dead just for virtue of being assigned female at birth and daring to identify as something other than a girl” I searched through baeddel posts from 2024 and I couldn’t find anything close to that, the closest I did find was a post saying all men should kill themselves, which does not mention non binary people and does not single out trans men or say that the reason is because they don’t identify as girls. If there are posts like this then I’m sorry that this happened but tu quoque.
The second post I wanted to look at is from 4e3076 that reads: Patricia Taxxon should be allowed to kill people. End quote.
This post doesn’t have anything I need to specifically define, it’s very straight forward, you may have noticed that the image of 4e3076’s post I used was from Agramuglia. Agramuglia shared a screenshot of the post as evidence that Patricia Taxxon is dangerous, and reblogged Crimsonender’s post endorsing it. I think the comparison of his attitude towards these two people is very interesting, a post that Patricia Taxxon did not make is evidence that she’s dangerous but a post that Crimsonender made fantasising about murdering a vulnerable minority is just a joke that he completely agrees with. Crimsonender and Agramuglia have engaged in lolcow and kiwi farms style stalking of multiple trans women and the simple reason is that they’re bad people and it's profitable for them.
