I love my men like I love my tea hot & British, most of the time

Ko-fi

Marvel

Once Upon a Time

House of Cards

Original stories 

Law and Order : SVU

When directors see Annabelle’s name on the call sheet.🤣🤣

On the contrary, why do YOU like her? Aside from the fact that she’s Seb’s gf, do you actually have reasons for liking her that don’t revolve around him? Did you ride this hard for her before she started dating him? And if you do like her, why seek out spaces that are critical just to insert yourself? You could easily find a AW blog to browse. This is how I know these people don’t actually like AW and just like to feel like they have a moral high ground for pretending to like her while living vicariously through her.

If I was a fan of her I’d be so irritated by them because they only care about her because they view her as an extension of him.

She is nice. A fashion icon and a great actress. She also post stories about Palestine and Gaza. And she adopts dogs (who she leaves most of the time). I’m

Twisted metal with anthony she was let go from in 2022

https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/twisted-metal-series-meet-star-studded-cast

2.beauty and the beast with link to yt

https://www.tumblr.com/annabellewallissource/685024317106503680/hello-i-was-wondering-if-you-know-anything-about?source=share

From shippers blog and them trying to say she is friends with luke so thats why she is there, because they would allow it, totally dont want to believed she was let go. And she is in the vid at 11:35, and one more time more toward the end of the vid from table reading in the village people section, so she probably didnt even got a big role and still was let go

3. Snow white

https://swathfansite.weebly.com/home/category/annabelle%20wallis

She was supposed to be sara in first part but they remove this and they just mention huntsman wife, and in second part i think jessica chastain play part of sara, so it wasnt that the whole sara character was not needed in part one and they could use aw in part two, they remove her from part one and the second the part two come they took different actress. They say she apear as someome in village that suposed to be sara but her part was small amd cut in final production and she dint have it in her credits so do with it what you want

4. Silence of mercy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silence_of_Mercy

Apparently she was a lead but this movie took place in 2021 she was cast in 2019 and this drama is still upcoming, sitting in post production for 5 years now

But suprise suprise if you type was aw let go from the movie google say no she was never let go and go to mention pb and mummy as her big hits from over 12 years ago. Her team try to hide it well, but on many sides and old articles from that time they still mention for example snow white as a movie she is known for like here https://www.imdb.com/news/ni45145637/?ref_=nm_nwr_1 so it was something she was probably so close to start in. I think there are much more she was let go from but not so late in production to leave and evidence behind, this and the fact the king arthur director name her as someone who ruin the movie and her role in horror movies both anabelle and this other one was name one of the worse and make it to the list of bad acting prrformance is telling

This is what "happy" looks like to you?? Oh, and here’s a more recent one too, with her already pregnant, by the way:

Well…your definition of "happy" is really weird, but I guess everyone’s different, right…

OH GOD now that you’re putting the gala, valentines and cannes together we see the common denominator 😭😭

Evelyn - “Seb you need to appear more welcoming to Annabella. Think along the lines of a small kiss in the red carpet, some supportive hand holding and helping her into a car.”

Seb - “I’m a professional, don’t worry.”

Disaster of Cannes follows.

Evelyn - “That is not what we talked about. Your attempt at a kiss fell flat, you forced her into a bush instead of guiding her gently to a car and sat as far away from her as you could in the car. I said welcoming! Not disgusted or uninterested!”

Seb - “welcoming?!? I knocked her up! How much more welcoming do I need to be? Someone else needs to entertain her for a while, I’m done. It’s exhausting.”

Emily - “Jesus Christ Sebastian, I will show you.”

Enter perfectly times selfies on a “private” account.

His glasses slipping down his nose. His messy hair.

The way his lips are slightly parted.

The pencil tucked behind his ear.

The bratty look over his glasses.

I have been thinking a bit about what really supports that these two are PR. A few things prior to the baby announcement really gave me pause when looking at that timeline; but first I am going to start from the beginning. The strongest part of the theory is the relationship has, if not always been, used as PR infrastructure, and the timing/framing around it is weirdly convenient.

First, Sebastian’s visibility did not disappear when he stopped using social media, he merely shifted mediums. His public image is “private actor who does not court attention,” but after his last Instagram activity around his 40th birthday in 2022, his craving for attention didn't stop. As we can see, he simply changed it into pap walks, vacation photos, tabloid items, red carpets, and couple sightings with Annabelle.

Their public timeline already looked like a soft launch. Annabelle’s split from Chris Pine was confirmed in March 2022, and by May 2022 she and Sebastian were being linked after a Robert Pattinson birthday party photo. However, we already know that they were seen in February 2022 by someone before the split from Pine. By summer 2022, they were being photographed together in Greece. That is a fast transition from prior relationship to new public couple narrative.

Then there is the most obvious career/proximity angle for Botoxbelle. Her biggest mainstream attempt was The Mummy, where even then she was heavily marketed as "Chris Martin's girlfriend' which clearly didn't turn her into a major star, and was a huge flop. Since then, a lot of her visibility and jobs have come through proximity to more famous men. She voiced Zora in Star Trek: Discovery and Short Treks, while she was publicly linked to Chris Pine, who had connections with Paramount due to his prior Star Trek roles.

Now, while being connected to Sebastian, she is in Mercy with Chris Pratt, was supposed to be in Twisted Metal, a project with Anthony Mackie, and was JUST announced in Oh, How Fun!, a film from Argyris Papadimitropoulos, the same director Sebastian worked with on Monday. Again, none of this proves that him or prior boyfriends got her any jobs, but the pattern of borrowed proximity and networking is incredibly obvious.

Now, the most interesting part that I just realized recently is that Sebastian’s longtime manager, Emily Gerson Saines, runs Brookside Artist Management. Deadline reported in February that Untitled Entertainment was in talks to acquire Brookside. Who is Untitled, you ask? Well it is also Annabelle’s management firm. So there is that very convenient professional link between Sebastian’s side and Annabelle’s side. I also need to drive home the point that Sebastian is her most famous client. She makes most of her money off of him. She attends nearly everything that he does professionally, which is incredibly odd. She has also managed him for what amounts to his entire career, which is also nearly unheard of. She also ingratiates herself into the lives of her clients, because she also manages Kieran and Macaulay Culkin, and they has publicly stated how involved she is in their personal lives, and is treated like a member of the family. Sebastian has also expressed this same sentiment. It likely explains why he hasn't fired her and gotten someone better like any other actor would've at this point.

Which makes it even more strange is that barely 10 days after the announcement that his manager was selling her firm, after not being seen together for months, they are suddenly seen together on Valentine’s Day with that now infamous pap walk, which was an obvious attempt to once again signal them as a couple. THEN little over a month later we get that TMZ report that Annabelle is pregnant. The wording of the announcement made it clear that they were spoon fed this information. Almost exactly a month after that, we get her doing her 400 pap walks around NYC that no one picked up until photos came out where he was walking with her. Suddenly, everyone treats the news as confirmed and she is then branded as 'pregnant Annabelle Wallis.' Consider that all this time we also see them heavily gearing up the Fjord promo. Then we get that Deadline interview where again he confirms nothing, but the entire interview was a bunch of abstractions about fatherhood and upbringing, ALL IN RELATION TO HIS MOVIE.

Then Cannes happens, and the coverage becomes 'pregnant Annabelle Wallis with Sebastian Stan,' not Botoxbelle as an actress with her own independent news value. Every tabloid reports the Cannes appearance as her debuting her baby bump alongside Sebastian while he was there promoting Fjord.

This is where the Fjord campaign becomes important and the purpose obvious. Sebastian is promoting a serious Cannes film where he plays a father in a Romanian family drama. Every single article framed Fjord around him reconnecting with his Romanian past, and Deadline’s Cannes interview framed his fatherhood comments through the film, including 'I want to be a good dad.' NOTHING was ever a solid confirmation that he was having a baby, and the topic clearly made him visibly uncomfortable and something he quickly moves on from.

What is interesting to note, is that all this mirrors what he did with The Apprentice. He didn't simply try to sell the role as a performance. but he sold it through his favorite topic, his checklist personal biography: Romania, communism, dictatorship, immigrant identity, and 'there is a Trump in all of us.' Vanity Fair also played heavily into his Romanian childhood and family history in its 2025 profile that came out after he lost the Oscar.

Now with Fjord, the personal biography hook is fatherhood. The public narrative for him now becomes: actor plays a father in a serious Romanian auteur drama while becoming a father in real life. He has his awards campaign already set for the rest of the year.

What I found that makes it stranger and more obvious that their entire relationship is a PR arrangement, is that neither of them seems to personally own the baby narrative directly. She has never posted him or directly referred to him on her social media. She hasn't even clearly made her own pregnancy announcement. She appears visibly pregnant in public, and lets the press do the announcing. He continues to filter everything through Fjord, as if that's the only thing that matters.

So the pattern is:

They do not directly confirm much themselves.

They let tabloids, pap photos, red carpets, and interview framing do the work.

She gets relevance as 'Sebastian Stan’s pregnant girlfriend.'

He gets fatherhood/serious actor optics while maintaining the image that he is private and not trying to get attention.

That is why this reads PR-coded to me. Not because every private part of the relationship must be fake, but because this relationship has served a PR purpose from day one. He planned to leave social media, and instead started using the PR happy Annabelle do all the work for him. He can pretend he isn't trying to be seen while actively participating in staged pap walks with his age-appropriate girlfriend who would never outshine him professionally and is happy to be the plus 1 and get access to more famous people in return.

It should also be noted that Botoxbelle DOESN'T HAVE A PUBLICIST. She has no image to manage, she is so irrelevant no one cares. This just makes it easier for Sebastian and his people to handle the optics, meaning that he is actively participating in this as much as she he. He is benefiting, make no doubt about it. Now whether the sale of his managers talent firm is also playing a part in this, that remains to be seen, but I find it very convenient that this kicked off right after that announcement was made that their management firms would be merging.

Before You Instantly Dismiss This, Shippers:

Honestly, I do not even know if most shippers will fully read this because a lot of you seem completely unwilling to listen to perspectives outside your own circles anymore. I think many of you already decided who antis are a long time ago and stopped actually hearing anything we say after that.

But I genuinely wish you would read this anyway.

Because despite what some of you seem to believe, many of us are not trying to be hateful. We are trying to explain that there is a massive difference between criticism, discomfort, skepticism, and actual cruelty. And a lot of us are exhausted from constantly being treated like monsters simply for disagreeing with a celebrity relationship.

Why I'm writing this.

I’ve already spoken before about parasocial shipping culture, projection, and why criticism is not automatically misogyny. But after everything that happened recently with certain fan pages and the nonstop accusations being thrown around, I need to address something directly because the way “antis” are being talked about in this fandom has become completely detached from reality.

And this is part of why I have become deeply skeptical of the narratives constantly spread about antis.

Why I No Longer Blindly Trust the Narratives Spread About Antis

At one point, I received multiple anonymous asks in a row attacking Annabelle. Some of them were nasty. One of them crossed a line and mentioned wishing harm on her child. I deleted it immediately because I do NOT support that kind of behavior. (By the way, I didn't post any of them because they were disgusting and crossed a line)

But what was especially interesting was that the person behind that specific ask forgot to stay anonymous. When I checked the account, it was a shipper page.

That moment genuinely changed the way I look at a lot of these accusations because it made me realize how easy it is for people to manufacture narratives and then weaponize them against entire groups of people.

So forgive me if I no longer blindly trust every anonymous “proof” post claiming antis are secretly violent monsters.

Especially when I have personally seen evidence that some people are more interested in pushing a narrative than telling the truth.

How “Antis” Became a Caricature Instead of Real People

The term “anti” has become part of the problem at this point because people hear that word and immediately imagine some deranged hate group instead of what most of us actually are: people who simply do not support a celebrity relationship.

Half the time I genuinely think a better label would be something like “non AW&SS relationship fans” because the word anti has been so distorted by fandom stuff that some of you automatically associate it with cruelty, extremism, harassment, or obsession before even listening to what people are actually saying!

Not supporting a celebrity relationship does NOT automatically make someone hateful, abusive, misogynistic, dangerous, or obsessed. A lot of you have completely flattened the word anti into meaning “evil person,” and honestly it is getting absurd.

I do not support Sebastian and Annabelle as a couple. That is my opinion. I think the timeline surrounding his previous relationship looks questionable. I do not think he was in the healthiest headspace when this relationship started. I think there are aspects of the relationship that feel unhealthy, performative, or complicated to me personally. You do not have to agree with any of that. But disagreement is not harassment.

And that is the distinction some of you refuse to acknowledge.

A lot of antis are not sitting around wishing harm on anybody. We are not some organized hate movement. Most of us are simply people who do not buy into the romanticized fantasy version of this relationship that shipping culture constantly pushes.

Stop Accusing Antis of Wanting Harm on a Child

And honestly, one of the most disgusting things I have seen come out of this fandom lately is the repeated claim that antis want Annabelle’s child dead or harmed.

Do some of you even realize how serious of an accusation that is?

You are not just calling people “mean” at that point. You are accusing an entire group of people of being cruel, violent, monstrous human beings simply because they do not support a celebrity relationship.

I have never once seen a legitimate anti wish death on a child. Ever.

What I HAVE seen is people take isolated anonymous comments, trolls, fake asks, or screenshots with zero context and immediately weaponize them against every anti in existence because it conveniently supports the narrative that we are all hateful psychos.

And what makes this even more insane is that one of the cruelest asks I ever received supposedly “from an anti” literally traced back to a shipper account that forgot to stay anonymous. So forgive me if I am skeptical when people immediately start spreading horror stories about antis without questioning where those messages are actually coming from.

Some of you have become so emotionally invested in defending this relationship that you genuinely cannot comprehend the difference between criticism and hatred anymore. The second someone dislikes the relationship, you immediately escalate it into “they want harm,” “they are evil,” “they are dangerous,” or “they are obsessed.”

That is not rational behavior.

The Double Standard Around Toxicity in This Fandom

I also need to address something else because some of you are being intentionally dishonest about the way toxicity operates in this fandom.

Shippers constantly speak about antis as though cruelty exists exclusively on our side while completely ignoring the fact that I have personally seen shippers say vile things too. I have seen people mocked, degraded, dogpiled, dehumanized, and spoken to horrifically simply because they do not support this relationship.

So please stop acting like one side is made entirely of innocent victims while the other side is uniquely monstrous. That is not reality.

Every fandom space has people who go too far. Every side has extremists. Every side has trolls. Every side has emotionally reactive people.

The difference is that when antis say something awful, shippers immediately assign it to the entire group and use it as proof that all antis are hateful. But when shippers behave cruelly, suddenly it becomes “just one person,” “not representative,” or something people should ignore.

That double standard is exactly what many of us are frustrated by.

And yes, I have seen disgusting comments from antis before. I am not denying that. I do not support harassment, cruelty, or wishing harm on anyone. But I have ALSO seen shippers say horrific things, including toward people who are already struggling mentally or physically, and somehow that never gets turned into a statement about all shippers collectively.

That inconsistency matters.

Some of You Do Not Want Conversation. You Want Control of the Narrative.

What also continues to amaze me is the complete unwillingness some shippers have to actually TALK to antis while simultaneously obsessively monitoring everything we say. You block people while continuing to screenshot them. You vaguepost instead of engaging directly. You create entire narratives about people you refuse to actually converse with.

And honestly, I think a huge part of the problem is that many shippers fundamentally confuse criticism with hatred. If someone does not romanticize the relationship the exact same way you do, suddenly they are jealous, misogynistic, bitter, parasocial, or insane.

Do you realize how reductive that is?

People are allowed to observe public behavior and come to different conclusions than you.

I have also repeatedly seen antis get conflated with completely different fandom extremists from entirely separate spaces. We are not responsible for every psychotic anonymous troll on the internet. Maybe some of you should start being more careful about who your sources actually are before spreading serious accusations about entire groups of people.

Criticism Is Not Parasociality

And ironically, the people constantly accusing antis of being “parasocial” are often the same people publicly discussing celebrities’ sex lives, fertility, future children, emotional intimacy, body language, and romantic destiny as though these people exist for public consumption.

That is part of the reason many antis became uncomfortable with shipping culture in the first place.

None of this means every anti is automatically rational or healthy. Every side has people who take things too far. But the idea that criticism automatically equals hatred while unconditional support automatically equals kindness is intellectually lazy.

You do not have to agree with antis. You do not have to dislike the relationship. But stop flattening thousands of different people into one evil caricature simply because they disagree with you.

And stop lying about us.

Posts of disgust for reference. They have all either blocked me or refused to actually have a conversation with me, by the way.

Also, the first screenshot is literally the comment that started this entire reaction toward me. And honestly? I was not even being particularly cruel there. Frustrated? Sure. Dismissive? Maybe. But nowhere in that post was I wishing harm on anybody, threatening anybody, or saying anything remotely close to the horrific accusations some of you have decided to attach to antis collectively.

That is exactly my point.

Some of you have become so emotionally conditioned to view disagreement as hatred that even mild criticism or frustration immediately gets interpreted as malice.

Screenshots For Context Since Apparently Everything Needs Proof

Just one last example of how genuinely sick and tired I am of people spreading horrible lies about antis.

This is literally me explaining that I do NOT support harming anybody and that I do NOT know a single anti who would ever wish harm on a child. Yet somehow people still continue pushing the narrative that all antis are violent, cruel, or dangerous simply because we do not support a celebrity relationship.

This is exactly the kind of shit I mean when I say people are flattening an entire group into a cartoon villain version of “the evil anti” instead of actually listening to what most of us are saying.

Notice how I never once grouped all shippers together or claimed every shipper was a bad person. That nuance clearly did not get extended back to antis.

Maybe People Would Understand Each Other Better if They Actually Talked

At the end of the day, I do not think every shipper is toxic.

And I do not think every anti is innocent.

I think a lot of people in this fandom have spent so much time talking ABOUT each other that they stopped actually talking TO each other.

And if people were willing to have real conversations instead of immediately assuming the worst, I genuinely think both sides would realize the reality is far more complicated than the caricatures fandom culture keeps pushing.

This Is the Real Problem

At the end of the day, you do not have to agree with antis. You do not have to like us.

You do not even have to understand why we feel the way we do.

But stop turning disagreement into moral hysteria.

Stop acting like criticism automatically equals hatred. Stop treating every anti like a violent extremist because of anonymous trolls and isolated screenshots.

And stop spreading disgusting accusations about people simply because they do not romanticize a celebrity relationship the same way you do.

Some of you have become so emotionally invested in defending this relationship that you have completely lost the ability to separate discomfort from danger, criticism from abuse, and skepticism from cruelty.

That is the real problem here.

Not every anti is innocent. Not every shipper is toxic. But the way some of you have dehumanized antis while pretending your own side is incapable of cruelty is intellectually dishonest and unbelievably hypocritical.

And honestly? The fact that so many of you would rather block, vaguepost, stalk, and invent narratives about us instead of actually having a conversation says more than I ever could.

You turned disagreement into villainy. You created a caricature of us in your heads. And now you are more attached to that caricature than reality itself.

I Am Tired

And ironically, this was said to someone already dying of cancer, whose mother helped pick out her casket dress just a few weeks ago. Not only are you wrong about who we are. You are wrong about my life too.

And frankly, I am exhausted.

Not just from fandom discourse. Not just from constantly watching people twist criticism into cruelty. But from life itself.

I am already dealing with enough in my real life, including cancer, and honestly one of the last things I ever wanted to spend my energy doing was defending myself and my friends from disgusting lies and fabricated narratives online.

But I am tired of staying quiet while people flatten human beings into monsters simply because they disagree with a celebrity relationship.

I am tired of watching people weaponize morality instead of having actual conversations.

And I am especially tired of watching people spread horrific accusations about others without caring whether they are even true.

So no, I am not going to quietly sit here and let people rewrite who we are.

Verdict : Really Fake Annabelle and her Rabid Dogs / Temporary Teen Toxicity. Non-contagious. Special Interest; some previous carriers have faced financial and legal repercussions.

Verdict : MuslimShifting / Unremarkable. Secondary Case