And it's you that I believe in

My being critical of you does not make me transmisogynist. Nor does my critique of you have anything do with you being a trans woman.

If you want to be dishonest and play the identity card with this as your proof? We can do that.

Shall I say your criticism of me makes you racist? How about biphobic? How about misogynist?

We can obfuscate the actual issue here all day if you want!

Wrong is wrong regardless of who's doing it. You're a grown woman and you know that. But you want to be manipulative and target me because I dare called a spade a spade. Tough. It's not going to work.

I also don't hate you. I think what you're doing is WILD but you don't consume my thoughts! I wasn't even close to posting about you incessantly. I have about 20,000+ posts and maybe two are about you. Months apart no less. But that's only because you keep unmasking yourself.

Now? I still can't even say I hate you.

What would that do for me? I'm indignant at what you're trying to pull. Disheartened that it's working with your followers. But by tomorrow? I promise you I won't care.

Show me where YOU were called a rapist and not an apologist.

Anyway, here is where the transmisogyny is:

Unless I'm supposed to know the track record of every OP here?

Are you being dense on purpose?

Prejudice is not merely critiquing a minority. But how and why.

The answer to marginalized people being inherently demonized is not canonizing us and acting like we do no wrong. You seem keen to do the latter and it's so interesting. But it benefits you so of course you're doing exactly as I said. Obfuscating the actual issue.

You think transmisogyny is just the act of critiquing a trans woman and not why.

If I sat here and defended D4VD because he's Black and you called me out on it would that make you racist or justifiably disgusted? Yes or no?

You are now openly calling sophie a rapist. You know! One of the things you asked me to prove.

You think transmisogyny is just the act of critiquing a trans woman and not why.

You're presenting this critique as something that is both right, correct to do, and unmotivated. This is transmisogyny.

Additionally, let's do something, together. Go on this link below.

Woah that's a lot of posts! And they're all about bad things I've (alledgedly) done! It's almost like the transmisogynist stalker is a transmisogynist stalker!

Would you not understandably be incensed that I'm protecting a man who murdered and groomed a little girl? Yes or no?

Damn why are you comparing sophie to a man that murdered a child? Why do you think this is not blatant transmisogyny??

I didn't know who you were protecting. Just how. And that people were upset enough to call you out. Like OP. Who you also think I had intimate knowledge of before reblogging the one post.

I now know it all. The person being accused. Who she harmed. Her apology. In addition to what she was accused of.

And my opinion of you is now worse. Congrats.

Especially because you're breezing past the fact that the hypothetical scenario I'm proposing hinges heavily on using identity politics to obfuscate wrongdoings and protecting predators. Like you're doing.

[Image ID: The Destiel confession meme edited so that Dean answers 'JK Rowling posted upskirt photos of a woman on Twitter' to Cas 'I love you'. /End ID]

No one doing this should be allowed to call themselves a feminist.