Fabergé Tenga Egg

the Irish word for Santa Claus literally translates to “daddy december” and I don’t know how to feel about that

great now i have to kinkshame ALL of IRELAND

person: my boyfriend just- me: dump them person: no its good news me: suck their dick

@lovejustlied

As someone who actually studied Latin for three years, this scene had me laughing uncontrollably.

“And if it’s not done by dawn, I’ll cut your balls off”

stop i thought kansas was a city in Missouri, goodbye I’ve been here almost 8 yrs and i still don’t have a clue

The only similarity is the fucking cartoon style you dumb shits.

NO OFFENSE BUT WHY DID ONE DIRECTION NOT WIN X FACTOR

because simon cowell made sure they didn’t so that they’d seem like a comeback story and so he would look like a genius who took third place finishers and made them superstars basically simon cowell sucks

I actually do take issue with male issues not being addressed intersectionally because it assumes that all men have the same problems which, just like for women, simply is not true. The issue I have with feminist and male movements is that it often generalizes the issues and doesn’t take in the many different nuances that come with being a man of color affected by hypermasculinity, homophobia, transphobia, prejudice against mental illness, class privilege, or internalized misandry. Addressing this isn’t pitting anyone against each other(like people on both sides of the feminist/mra debate claim) but simply acknowledging the many different problems people have. Intersectionality is VITAL to ANY movement, whether it’s in an egalitarian, feminist, or mra group and all these groups, in my opinion have the exact same problem and a deep hesitance to address it. And it’s detrimental to everybody.

Intersectionality is not vital, it is counterproductive. It fosters divisiveness and splintering. And it’s core assumption is that some people deserve more assistance or positivity than others simply by their birth.

Intersectionality actually is the complete opposite of how problems work. When you notice a problem swathing multiple people of different backgrounds (even if affecting some people worse than others), you try to deduce the common denominator of the issues. When it comes to something let’s say that others might make intersectional, like fatherlessness in black communities, intersectionalists would just focus on the black aspect, instead of seeing that fatherlessness affects men in general period. That solving the issue of how society views fathers are less important than mothers is the big issue, bigger than how the black community personally sees black men as fathers, seeing men is the bigger picture, seeing men as capable parents, as parents worthy of not denying them their children. And also seeing that men in general are made parents all the time even when they are not ready or capable, all because MEN, all MEN, have not a shred of reproductive rights, if a woman gets impregnated then she calls all the shots and if she wants to keep the baby then he has to deal with it, even though keeping the baby was all her choice, he is now subjected to every consequence of that choice even if he can’t handle that. Another example, an intersectionalist would see the problem trans men have such as being seen as acceptably male or unacceptably male due to how masculine they present, an intersectionalist would see this as a uniquely trans issue. A non-intersectionalist would see that this is not exclusive to trans men, even cis men who are not as masculine have troubles being perceived as “real men” due to having traditionally non-masculine interests, or due to physical traits like not being tall or muscular or not having a deep voice. The problem here is when you treat trans men as still trans men, despite being men, and I’m just guessing, they might feel like they’ll never belong in being a man if you keep setting them aside and saying oh… but you’re a TRANNNNNS man, you’re different. The goal of being a trans man is to be a man, not to be different, or so every single trans man I’ve met has told me that and felt that way. Intersectionality can work, but not the way everyone PC nowadays likes to implement it, treating problems as unique to one subgroup ever and creating otherism and divided lines when we really need to be communicating together and finding common grounds and solidarity in the many forms our shared issues can take. United we stand, divided we fall.

MRAs only support cishet white able-bodied dudes with fucking alpha male personalities (even if they’re all super fucking “beta”). If you’re anything else, you’re “lower” than them and worthy of shame.

don’t most MRA’s also fight for the rights of black, latino, transgender men(and women), disabled men??? you know that is why it says MEN’S rights activist??? or am I imaging things? also wasn’t it feminists that excluded black and latino women, always focused on the middle and upper class, and consider trans women not actual women??? you know, actual feminists.

Do you actually KNOW any MRAs fighting for trans, disabled, and/or mentally ill men? What about MoC? Or are you just assuming that’s actually a thing that happens lol

Lol, mental health services is actually a huge deal for the MRM, considering men kill themselves 4 times as often as women do. Also, apparently you think that trans men and minority men aren’t actually men? 

People came up with these endless internal divisions and 'intersectionality'' so they can say "Look you guys, we're helping hundreds of groups, bow down to us". And think that, when a group drops the charade and work in a straightforward way, they're doing it wrong.