Elementary/Middle School Napoleonica Fora
I didn't believe I would miss Bob Burnham's old Napoleon Series discussion forum as much as I do.
During its lengthy run, this forum averaged more than thirty posts each day on a variety of topics from almost all imaginable viewpoints and all sorts of nationalities. Additionally, the participants were historians with degrees, researchers with multilingual skills, reenactors, wargamers, uniform specialists, and artists, all of whom knew a thing or two, and were usually very happy in the weeds. Aside from arguments, some heated, some snarky [that was almost always me], some weighty and measured, we could count on the fact that we had only a minuscule number of uneducated fools to deal with. It is one thing to disagree with someone’s opinion, well-stated and well-researched, and quite another to suffer through a comment/post from someone who offers only garbage from Wikipedia or AI, too stupid to know where the inaccuracies are.
I disliked two things about Burnham, however. The first was his utterly misguided insistence on forbidding anyone to write and post book/article reviews that were analogous to the Amazon/Goodreads one- and two-star shellackings of what is, in truth, crap. This prohibition sailed much too close to the Southern grandmotherly admonition about saying nothing at all if one can’t say anything nice. Not only is that simply stupid, but it is also intellectually dishonest. The second thing is closing the forum because he claimed the original platform was past its prime, could not be sustained, was too expensive and too convoluted to change, and offered other typical excuses from men who are not tech-savvy and who no longer want the responsibility. As bad as that was, the true kiss of death was turning over the remnants of the once great forum to a thoroughly Brit-centric kid barely past acne and an advanced degree/studies centered solely on Wellington and his army, in—wait for it!—the Peninsula Wars.
The successor forum, TheNapoleonicWars.net, despite its desperate attempts to attract an audience and thus become relevant, manages on average five posts weekly from only a handful of folks who consistently play in the same anti-French, pro-British and Austrian sandbox. Its favorite experts are a Scots lass with a charming accent who does podcast episodes on the Marshalate, relying solely on questionable secondary sources; a female Dutch academic whose areas of expertise include international relations, terrorism and political violence, radicalism, and national security, and who ties herself in knots to translate some of the into a Napoleonic context – right up there with insisting Napoleon was a dictator just like Stalin and Hitler; and a military historian/psychiatrist claiming that Napoleon suffered from narcissistic derangement, probably bi-polar, and suffering from PTSD. Nothing like adding a bit of psychobabble to the witches' brew.
In fairness and transparency, the Brit-centric administrator banned me from this group after less than a year. Apparently, he disliked my demanding proof of quite a few statements by posters and arguing certain points without filters.
The other alleged Napoleonic site with a fair amount of traffic is “Generals and Napoleon,” which offers very little other than pirated filler like “OTD in History,” “Did You Know…?, and daily reprehensible AI “artwork,” about which many viewers have complained, to no avail. This site also offers episodes on YouTube, but unfortunately, borrows some of the very same [non]experts from White’s website. The administrator of the G and N clearly doesn’t vet the snippets of information he posts for accuracy; I could work full-time as an editor for him.
I did get carried away, I’m afraid, but I feel better.
I have also noticed that here on Tumblr, the frequent and engaging discussions in the Napoleonic community have slowed way down, with an apparent switch to art. I’d like to see more balance between the two.