imagine Benedict Cumberbatch furiously trying to hide a boner.
this is the ugliest post on this earth and if i have to see it so does everyone else
happy 10th birthday to this post

KIROKAZE
occasionally subtle
Show & Tell

roma★

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
we're not kids anymore.
YOU ARE THE REASON
$LAYYYTER
Game of Thrones Daily
Mike Driver
Not today Justin

Product Placement
Today's Document
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Cosimo Galluzzi
RMH

⁂

Andulka
DEAR READER

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Taiwan

seen from Japan
seen from Argentina

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Hungary
seen from United States
@jbk405
imagine Benedict Cumberbatch furiously trying to hide a boner.
this is the ugliest post on this earth and if i have to see it so does everyone else
happy 10th birthday to this post

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've got a real shopping dilemma. I found a three-film Blu-ray set of the Kelvin timeline Star Trek films. Only $10. That's a reasoanbly good bargain.
But I don't like two of the three films. Only Beyond comes close to "getting" Trek.
To add salt in the wound, I already have Into Darkness. It was included in a friend's collection when he gave me all of his discs. Do I really want to own two copies of the worst one?
I suppose I can try to view it as just buying Beyond, since $10 isn't bad for one movie either.
Hmmmm, these are the quandaries I face in life.
I love Andy Weir's books but this man is dumb as a bucket of rocks. Dude you have your characters turn to the reader and explain what the social commentary of the book was. You know it's there because you include the sparknotes in the story itself. What the fuck are you talking about.
This is the real actual ending of The Martian.
This is in the last chapter of Artemis.
This man does not know what the words "politics" or "social commentary" mean.
Dude is extremely good at exactly one thing and that is extremely well researched near future hard scifi and is somewhere between mediocre and dogshit at basically everything else
#what's crazy is that project hail mary is SO FUCKING POLITICAL#he names Rocky's partner a male name#he talks about global warming and mass extinction#he discusses the demolition of the biggest desert on the planet#talks about heterosexuality and war and famine#he doesn't have a clue what politics is which is crazy because he puts it in everything he writes
Mostly true but, as a small point of correction, Adrian is named after Adrian Pennino.
Adrian is Rocky Balboa's love interest, and later wife, in the Rocky movies. She is a woman. Ryland named an alien Rocky because they looked like they were made of rocks, and when he had to come up with a name for their spouse, named them after Rocky's spouse.
It's still hilarious that Weir chose a name that is gender-neutral but also historically mostly used by men for the partner of his human-gender-does-not-apply rock engineer and apparently didn't mean a thing by it. Dude does a simple Rocky Balboa joke and unintentionally becomes a pro-trans pro-equal marriage supporter.
Which, along with everything above, brings me to think that Andy Weir has that quirk that I have seen in many white-cis-straight Americans (not only among them, of course, but it's very prominent in those whose life has not been Political by default) where they believe that social issues and politics are two completely separate, non-overlapping things: one has to do with Real People Issues, and the other has to do with parties and politicians and who gets to have a seat in the House.
Under that worldview, you can justify just about anything as non-political as long as you don't explicitly mention the left or the right, even when the subject matter you're writing about (like, I dunno, the whole world working together and handing the reins to scientists to solve a problem, and two completely alien people figuring out how to talk to each other and form a bond of friendship and (almost) giving their life to save each other's species) is extremely political for anyone who has eyes to see.
Thinking that there is no politics in his books reminds me of this disclaimer from The Nightly News:
Hickman sincerely thought he was writing a non-political revenge thriller comic, because he didn't mention either political party.
The plot of nightly news is that a senator forms a murder cult out of people whose lives were ruined by cable news and uses them to murder a bunch of journalists in order to create a crisis situation that helps him pass a bill that removes the media liability shield so people can sue the news into oblivion. The "revenge" part is literally a two page detour that takes place after countless unrelated people have been gunned down. The comic is also full of infographics presenting real-world data that supports the arguments being made by the murder cultists to justify killing people.
It is fucking baffling to claim that it is a nonpolitical book about revenge, when it spends so much time discussing politics and the revenge is almost an afterthought.
tgis is so fucking funny to me. they accidentally Rock Lee'd a retired racehorse
imagine youre a fat horse and your new neighbour is a personal trainer
horse that reads Marcus Aurelius
I was wrong. they didnt rock lee him. this horse is literally Gai. and i wish he was my dad
the girl who won’t grow up
seeing all the leaked screencaps of the aged up gaang got me thinking about yue </3
(no reposts; reblogs appreciated)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if theres one thing that really pissed me off from my 3 years of architecture i took in high school it's learning about how we used to have all these little techniques to maximize or minimize heat or warmth and now we just merrily abandoned all those to have the same copypaste style buildings everywhere that are often INCREDIBLY unoptimized to the local weather and climate so we can just throw more money at our heating and cooling bills
where i live it is hot as balls approximately 80% of the year. i do not want a massive butt-ugly grey mcmansion with a huge echoey open-concept kitchen-livingroom-foyer-diningroom-staircase that has huge windows so i can have an hvac unit the size of a barge heaving and straining to keep it at a constant 72 the grees. i want a north indian traditional style home with small windows to force the airflow to cool, decorative grates to limit the amount of sunlight, and a COURTYARD with a POND *smashes unspecified large object*
I hate learning about instances of "oh yeah we know how to do that, we just don't".
I think it would have been funny if Riley genuinely was just a normal likable guy. Maybe he accidently ended up in the initiative's frat, and at first they think he's somehow connected but he's just so nice that the guys just decided to keep him around. They tell Walsh they're going to try to recruit him at some point but don't. Once the gang finds out about the initiative everybody is immediately suspicious of him but he doesn't know what's going on. He seems to always just stumble right out of sight of some supernatural stuff like mr magoo.
I am constantly seeing people trying to puzzle out what's "ruining books" and it makes me more and more tired. Read a different book. You have more choice in reading material than at any other point in all of history. No one thing can be ruining ALL of them.
This may sound stupid but. How do you even begin to look for new tiny frogs???
Regarding Sisko's actions from "In The Pale Moonlight" and Section 31, how do we condemn the latter while justifying the former?
What makes you think we justify the former? His actions were wholly immoral from start to finish. The episode is us listening to his confession - seeing him walk down the road to hell all the way and why he did what he did and why he's going to keep quiet about it. Remember - this is a fictional character we're talking about. We don't need to agree with what he's done to find the whole thing compelling and interesting and dramatically satisfying. Sisko knows what he did was wrong and feels that his own guilty conscience over what he did is a small price to pay for saving lives. It's character development and nuance to see him tortured over it, but needing to ultimately live with it because he feels the consequences of his actions will ultimately do more good than harm. He's still in the wrong, but you understand why he did it. Contrast that with, say, Phlox - who withholds a cure for a plague based off of a faulty and incorrect definition of evolution, smugly saying how proud he is that the Captain didn't order him to save lives just because he THINKS one species deserves to live over another. THAT is character assassination and immorality that deserves a lot more condemnation than it gets.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Cosplayers at a Star Trek Convention, 1976
in this house we have endless respect for cosplayers from the days before VCRs.
You couldn’t just rewatch the episode to look at all the details of the costume. You got lucky with press photos showing up in magazines or you just watched the episode/movie while sketching furiously
thinking about that one woman who made a Star Wars flight suit in 1977 entirely from trading cards and sketching details in the theater. or stories I’ve heard about old school Trek cosplayers getting the bizarre seam placements right by photocopying magazines onto overhead transparencies and projecting them onto butcher paper.
I’m a semi old school cosplayer (started in 2001) so some of the old school techniques are still things I learned on (I’ve sketched from stuttering VHS tapes on pause and used the overhead transparency trick)… what we have access to now for costume recreation blows what they had out of the water just in terms of reference material, let alone specialty costume supplies like thermoplastics and cosplay wigs.
That Star Wars fan who made the flight suit from trading cards and movie sketches is TJ Burnside and she is still with us. In fact, I am adding to her Fanlore page with info about the flight suit (and how it went viral on Twitter and Redditt a few years back). Fanlore.org, is a fan run fandom history wiki. Stay tuned.
Her (sadly) barebones Fanlore page is here: https://fanlore.org/wiki/T.J._Burnside
The flight suit in question:
Not enough people know about wireless-fireless
Not enough of you were reading ComicJK, a minor webcomic from the late 2000s whose last update was during the 2012 election
PHILIP SEYMOUR HOFFMAN as Lester Bangs
ALMOST FAMOUS (2000) dir. Cameron Crowe
i have recently decided to shave my head. surprisingly good experience. have been given far more professional defference than i actually deserve as a result. but. slight hazard. my coworkers are very kind and they have insisted on complimenting my skull shape. they are very insistent that i have a very nicely shaped skull. this is a perplexing and mildly unsettling compliment. i feel like a hot twink at the gay phrenologist bar. a lot of people have walked up behind me and simply gripped my head like a bowling ball too, which i personally have enjoyed, but suspect the average person would not. also, unless i shave my head every day, it becomes surprisingly hard to take my hoodie/beanie/hat off. its like having my head wrapped in grip tape. overall 9/10 experience.
i also shaved an avatar arrow into it for the first day which the techs were overjoyed with. if you shave your head, you do get one day with your entire head as a blank canvas for any kind of tomfoolery. avatar was a frankly milquetoast option. if id walked in with, hypothetically, the toyota logo i think i would have been run out of my own lab on a rail.
this is the best website on the internet
This is literally how the shadow girls talk in utena

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou
Let’s fucking go
This is HUGE.
1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.
2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.
3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."
4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.
TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.
5. If the words are Google's, this solidifies the position of universities who demand that all answers from AI are fully cited. If all the in-line citations now have to be (Google, 2026), that's going to make it obvious when someone's trying to use Google as a source. There's still the difficulty with people who are academically dishonest by trying to pass off the AI writing as their own. 6. 91% accuracy is officially too low to use as a source of references, which means the AI can't be used as a source of references either. This makes it less legitimate for such purposes than Wikipedia of all places (Wikipedia might need date/time proof of when it was accessed for the reference to be valid, but at least it is possible to prove the link existed at a particular date and time). 7. This will help encourage the rollout of courses on how to avoid AI search for students who need academic accuracy, because it's statistically not good enough to use. 8. This strengthens the case intellectual property authors have against Google in the EU, as this is proof that an intellectual property transfer took place.