Isabased

MAY YOU NEVER LOSE YOUR HYPERFIXATION

she has to

reference:

So, the following very scientific picture was auto-tagged as "Non-sexual Nudity":

This second experiment was also picked up by the purity-bot:

While I theorized that perhaps it was the raunchy rectangles that were being flagged, this proved to be incorrect as the next tests was negative:

My suspicion that the robot was looking for Vagina Bones also turned out to be erroneous:

However! When knees were re-introduced into the test, suddenly, the machine manifested and tagged the image as Non-sexual Nudity once more:

A workable theory began to take form, as censoring the knees did not wake the nudist-huntbot, suggesting that perhaps its nakedness sensor may be patella-based:

In further testing this theory I realized I'd unknowingly introduced too many variables (the previous test had sparkles! Sparkles!):

This came up negative, but I cannot be certain as to why. At this point it was clear my scientific method was lacking and I do not have the chops/patience for true evidence-based sciencing.

Before abandoning this study that would most certainly not pass peer-review, I conducted one final test:

Yes, it appears drawings with the evil hand do not trigger the abstinent algorithm. I believe artwork will be safe from automated suppression as long as only the evil hand is involved, though more rigorous testing is needed to be absolutely sure.