hot chicks with superpowers

-happy birthday chris archie

-little bit of technique

-73 (you ginger prick)

-$11 (crab emoji)

-bread and lasagne (lynx titan)

-what arm thing homie?

-did you talk to oziach?

-hahahahahaha WOW (25 buttholes)

-y'all afraid of lawyers? you should be?

the ones that aren't fully legendary yet but that have come out of DMM allstars 3 and that I think might become legendary with time:

cringe dogs [actually from allstars 2 but then it was just lol @ ditter being cringe, but eliop elevated it to meme status with that perfect callback]

Victim has it

and ok just some other misc ones from various eras

pleae

i tick eat th ose

it make me upset

did you take my visafe?

WHEN IT REGISTERS

I LOOOOOOVE THE PUSSAY (Stefan! We're live on the Runescape Channel!)

"rank 2 smithing" as code for shitting your pants

Woox won

If the community wants it, sure

not exactly a meme but a legendary moment when that guy actually poured hot coffee into his asshole and filmed it and posted it on reddit because the penguin course guy got the agility pet

[C engineer voice] completed.

ok another C Engineer one that is not really a meme to anyone else but lives in my head RENT FREE: the moment from GG season 4 finale challenge when he was trying to figure out a coded clue to a location spelled with emotes and mixed up Dance and Jig but was too dense to figure it out with all the other letters right and he just goes "Aranjar gate? What is Aranjar gate?"

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

This torches everything. And I do mean everything.

A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):

ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives

allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason

preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies

requiring that topics must support the president’s agenda.

What this means, and if anything I’m under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.

Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:

"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ"

I can't go back.