it really is very interesting to me that people who think they sound quite intelligent on this website are very willing to label dead/historical figuresΒ βgay/lesbianβ while balking at labeling dead/historical figuresΒ βbisexualβ, often claiming thatΒ βbisexualβ is a label restricted to a modern, western time frame, as if gay/lesbian arenβt terms also created within that same relative time/geographic frame, defined/pathologized through similar institutions and disciplines (sexology, psychology, medicine, etc). and i didnβt write this post as a response to any discourse or anything - what iβm describing is an actual trend in transnational queer studies! clare hemmings has a phenomenal article about this that i recommend reading (if you have an open mind). iβve actually posted some excerpts and quotes from it before but itβs one of my favorite articles ever about bisexuality.Β
i completely forgot to post a link to the article lmao, my bad! itβs calledΒ βWhatβs in a name? Bisexuality, transnational studies and western colonial legaciesβΒ Β (by Clare Hemmings)Β






















