nope!!!!

different ring

they are going to absolutely say that they are not engaged, but its her supporting and wearing her own line

I have a degree in journalism so please listen to what I am about to say very carefully: Page six, DailyMail and other gossip sites are not considered to be trustworthy in any sense of the word, they want to generate clicks and that often comes from following and spreading rumors that come from the internet like twitter, instagram, etc. They do not have sources that are credible, they do not follow credibility or journalistic standards that we follow, by often getting paid by a celebrity to create a false narrative so their names get noticed on social media, it is used to generate more money to the site and to the celebrity that it helps, like Zoe Kravitz who is in charge of the publicity of the met gala, and who doesn’t have any true jobs listed because she can only get noticed by having her name attached to someone else. Anonymous sources are not credible, they say what they say in order to help someone get the attention that they crave, especially when time is running out for a publicity stunt or that they know that they won’t be noticed for a long while afterwards. The recycling of content in each article from years prior is a sign that the story is false information just to generate more attention. The word usage of reportedly or in question marks is indirectly telling the audience to not take this story seriously because it’s not real. Please don’t fret about what is being said on these gossip sites and pages, because it’s only for attention, not to spread real information.

This works for other people as well…just saying

Reblogging this again for nooooo reason

I have a degree in journalism so please listen to what I am about to say very carefully: Page six, DailyMail and other gossip sites are not considered to be trustworthy in any sense of the word, they want to generate clicks and that often comes from following and spreading rumors that come from the internet like twitter, instagram, etc. They do not have sources that are credible, they do not follow credibility or journalistic standards that we follow, by often getting paid by a celebrity to create a false narrative so their names get noticed on social media, it is used to generate more money to the site and to the celebrity that it helps, like Zoe Kravitz who is in charge of the publicity of the met gala, and who doesn’t have any true jobs listed because she can only get noticed by having her name attached to someone else. Anonymous sources are not credible, they say what they say in order to help someone get the attention that they crave, especially when time is running out for a publicity stunt or that they know that they won’t be noticed for a long while afterwards. The recycling of content in each article from years prior is a sign that the story is false information just to generate more attention. The word usage of reportedly or in question marks is indirectly telling the audience to not take this story seriously because it’s not real. Please don’t fret about what is being said on these gossip sites and pages, because it’s only for attention, not to spread real information.

also i went to one of the top schools for journalism and my professors have worked for very high profile and reputable organizations and have first hand experience with these types of websites

I have a degree in journalism so please listen to what I am about to say very carefully: Page six, DailyMail and other gossip sites are not considered to be trustworthy in any sense of the word, they want to generate clicks and that often comes from following and spreading rumors that come from the internet like twitter, instagram, etc. They do not have sources that are credible, they do not follow credibility or journalistic standards that we follow, by often getting paid by a celebrity to create a false narrative so their names get noticed on social media, it is used to generate more money to the site and to the celebrity that it helps, like Zoe Kravitz who is in charge of the publicity of the met gala, and who doesn’t have any true jobs listed because she can only get noticed by having her name attached to someone else. Anonymous sources are not credible, they say what they say in order to help someone get the attention that they crave, especially when time is running out for a publicity stunt or that they know that they won’t be noticed for a long while afterwards. The recycling of content in each article from years prior is a sign that the story is false information just to generate more attention. The word usage of reportedly or in question marks is indirectly telling the audience to not take this story seriously because it’s not real. Please don’t fret about what is being said on these gossip sites and pages, because it’s only for attention, not to spread real information.

This works for other people as well…just saying