chiri-chiri

must feel so good to be soil absorbing rain

you should pet the dragon snout it’s very soft and warm

unlike our more hard-line ML and anarchist friends (I'm being a centrist here!) I don't personally see the need to wed yourself to certain organizing tactics as a matter of principle. I think a lot of the tactical political decisions that our forebears made were not always out of devotion to a principle, they were made in a particular political context (that is often omitted when talking about it in the present, and the principle becomes a post-hoc rationalization), and I think it's bizarre and self-sabotaging to shoehorn all your activity through one narrow tactical lens. there are tradeoffs to leaderless organizations. there are tradeoffs to banning factions within your democratic centralist party. what are those tradeoffs, are they worth it, and do they help accomplish a political goal? why were these decisions made historically? to me there's just no sense in trying to constantly fit a square peg in a round hole. things are different now and nearly anything is on the table as far as I'm concerned, and it would be nice if we could figure out how to adapt to the moment

HE PUT IT INTO WORDS💞💞💞💞💞

Imagine being the gays at a pride event in 2004 living their lives when someone grabs the microphone and announces to the room that Ronald Reagan was pronounced dead. Can you even imagine the hype, the celebration, the pure elation

This is the Pride Month that It will happen. I feel it in my gay bones