Not that it’s a huge stretch to say that there might be parallels between the two characters whose careers led them to have their consciousness carved out and replaced with something monstrous, but Episode 193 and some of the reactions I’ve seen to it have me thinking about Helen Richardson again.
Personally I find Elias sympathetic regardless of what background and personality we can glean from his statement, but I’ve seen a lot of discussion about whether his obvious privilege and entitlement prevent him from garnering sympathy.
It comes down to personal taste, of course! You don’t have to like him or dislike him. But on the subject of disliking…
HELEN
You haven’t looked into Helen-Classic’s past yet? You should try it. I don’t think you’ll like what you find.
ARCHIVIST
What? Lying to real estate clients? Bit of a prick at parties? Secret Tory?
HELEN
Yes.
To all of them, actually.
ARCHIVIST
And that’s the problem. I could have grown to dislike her, but… you made sure that sort of thing could never happen. Now you use her form, see her mind, but they’re just… tools. Michael had nothing you could use but a razor-straight desire for vengeance, but you saw something in Helen that would work on me much more subtly. So you took her. And I’ll never get to dislike her.
I’m stuck disliking you instead.
(MAG 187, Checking Out)
And this is the real tragedy of Elias Bouchard, in my opinion. Just like with Helen, all we have of him are snapshots of the most terrifying moments of his life, before he was eventually replaced with and overshadowed by something else. For good or ill, there was more to him than what we got, and we’re never going to see it. Maybe we could have come around to liking him. Maybe we would have disliked him even more. We’ll never know if we could have loved or hated him.
We’re stuck hating Jonah Magnus instead.





















