Joshing around

“slurpee” just sounds like australian slang for a blowjob

Nah that’s Blowie

Actually its called a gobby in Australia 

why do you guys think this statement does anything but prove my point

Forbidden Prototype of“Wii Murder” Discovered in Brazil

HEY MOE

whos ready for some all-star mode

Alan Sepiinwall knows tv.  He gets it.

ENTER the gourd cave, give him tribute.

my dads getting a great birthday present. the well people are finally coming to tell us what the fucks up with the water

update: we drilled too deep and weve been drinking hawaiian punch instead of water for four months

me wearing a dog collar and leash looking up at my manfriend in his trench coat and fedora: let’s go out in public where you can walk me like i’m a dog in front of people who are visibly uncomfortable

IT’S NOT A FL*PPING FEDORA, IT’S A BOWLER HAT!!!!!!!

Keeo goobin’ goober. A fedora is a fedora is a fedora.

“Irrationally prejudiced” motherfucker admit you have a petplay fetish. there’s no shame in it on this website.

Okay… just please consider the following scenario. It’s five to ten years from now. You’re sitting in a restaurant, enjoying a lovely meal, when I walk in, accompanied by my wife, my children, and my human pet (whose genitals are covered as it enters on all fours and is wearing underpants). If my family and I then make an order of our own at the table next to you, in what way have we infringed upon your freedom? What rational basis do you have to demand that we leave or beloved pet at home? H*ck it all, let’s consider a more extreme scenario.  It’s five to ten years from now. You’re sitting in a restaurant, enjoying a lovely meal, when I walk in, without my wife and children (for whatever reason, they haven’t accompanied me), with my surgically modified human pet (wearing a collar) being lead in by it’s leash. My pet has been spayed/neutered (though you can’t tell because its genitals -along with its boobies if its a female- have been covered up), it has no vocal chords, and it walks on all fours not by choice, but because its toes have been removed, along with the tendons in its ankles being severed (it may also have had its thumbs and the last two segments of each finger amputated, making it easier to care for -no fingernails to trim-). Perhaps I’ve even (humanely) removed its eyes, making it less independent. Even in this scenario, I haven’t infringed upon your liberties. “Irrationally prejudiced” is precisely what you are.

dude wtf

I was having a conversation with @an-average-sized-person about the ethics of taking a human pet out in public. He thinks that they should always be left at home, I disagreed.

And to clarify: he insists that it isn’t a sex thing. Suuuuuuuure buddy…

Why do YOU think that it is?

Because this is what you’re basically describing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_roleplay

It states that this is sometimes sexual, but not always.

You basically want to keep a fucking slave.

Oh horsefeathers. I just want a specific type of pet, which happens to be human. You’re acting like I’ve announced an intention to force some poor captive down a salt mine at gunpoint.

Would your hypothetical pet human want this? To be legally property of someone else?

Ideally, yes. Quite apart from the moral concerns, consent would probably make things easier for everyone involved.

Would they consent to your hypothetical surgeries?

What sort of monster do you think I am? I wouldn’t just spring it on them out of the blue!

What if they say no?

I’ll cross that bridge when I come to it.

You started it!

You reblogged that post. That wasn’t even my post.

I thought that you were using the fedora stereotype. Lots of people do that, but I love my bowler hat.

Hey quick question what the FUCK

and the award for unclefather post of the year goes to