Untitled

theyre an tadc crit account. they criticize the show for having shit writing and so on. the only time they talk about goosework is about the fact how shes an actual fucking weirdo but yeah lets just erase allat and say theyre only doing that cus shes trans. NO THEYRE NOOT

This isn't true of the right. No matter what I do, how much I try to confirm to the right's wishes and demands, the right will eventually try to kill me, no matter what a Black person does, the right wants them dead or enslaved, no matter how much a Palestinian does, the right wants them dead or displaced, no matter how much a worker does, the right wants them starving or, if it comes to it, dead. The right constructs entire groups of people who are inherently their political enemies. Our actions, our beliefs, and our circumstances can only change our prioritization in their list, not place on it.

I might get some hate for this, but "former nazis" are not a problem. If anything, every single one of them is a victory, a person saved from the participation in our eradication and saved for the struggle against it. What is a problem is the actual nazis, the real bigots and terfs and the reactionaries who like to wear progressive masks and use lefty slogans while fighting on the wrong team.

she got angry and said "then they need to pick a different word". and so you need to pick a different word.

don't think this is exclusive to public spaces like the mall or the park or whatever either. she has a tablet and access to the internet, just the same as you do. she can read, write, and make her own decisions. she has a husband.

It also does international events "Dien Bein Phu falls", "England's Got a New Queen" that aren't a part of the USA as well.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sjgames/seven-part-pact

Instead of a cutesie reference to film censorship it was an explicit statement of defiance of Maryland's criminalization gay sex, which was not repealed until 2002. This wasn't a guy saying "Oh they can't put what I do in the movies according to a completely voluntary industry code" he was saying "The State of Maryland wants to put me in jail for being gay and having gay sex."

That bein' said, let's get t' the 'ilariously ridiculous misinterpretation of me words.

The Hays code was indeed homophobic, racist, sexist and a lot of other things, but it also ended in 1968 (though attitudes towards media censorship to this day from it can be rather clearly seen).

That is, in fact, irrelevant t' the act of homphobia and disrespect of the shirt edit.

The fact of the matter is that that shirt is a specific political statement against a specific homophobic law which was active at the time of the photo in... from a quick bit of research... 1987 and would not be repealed until 15 years after the fact.

Changing it to a joke on a media production code that was not even active for 19 years before the image is, in fact, homophobic.

Changing it to literally anything would be homophobic. It's not about The Hays Code, it was never meant to be about The Hays Code. It's an insult to what that shirt was saying.

You don't edit someone's protest against their oppression for a laugh. And anyone who has so little respect is homophobic.

People get arrested by homophobic laws, lose there freedom and lose an incredible amount of opportunity if they hold a criminal record of any kind. There are presumably people still alive today who were arrested under that law.

Instead, I'll simply ask: What part of 'Changing it to literally anything would be homophobic.' didn't get comprehended?

I guess I have to point this out: That that man is not a paper doll in a dress up game.

He doesn't exist for a cheap gag edit or this... attempt t' debate someone's moral standards, I guess is what this is?

Because "Law for the Purpose of Protecting Children from Information Advocating a Denial of Traditional Family" is that. It's a homophobic law that unlike that section of Maryland Code, IS STILL FUCKIN' ACTIVE.

Also, Section 28 is the best known example of homophobic british laws and came into existence roughly one year after that image, in 1988.

But let's do it as strictly as possible, by using another anti-LGBT law in the USA that criminalizes the same acts as the maryland one. Except in Texas:

Instead of a cutesie reference to film censorship it was an explicit statement of defiance of Maryland's criminalization gay sex, which was not repealed until 2002. This wasn't a guy saying "Oh they can't put what I do in the movies according to a completely voluntary industry code" he was saying "The State of Maryland wants to put me in jail for being gay and having gay sex."

That bein' said, let's get t' the 'ilariously ridiculous misinterpretation of me words.

The Hays code was indeed homophobic, racist, sexist and a lot of other things, but it also ended in 1968 (though attitudes towards media censorship to this day from it can be rather clearly seen).

That is, in fact, irrelevant t' the act of homphobia and disrespect of the shirt edit.

The fact of the matter is that that shirt is a specific political statement against a specific homophobic law which was active at the time of the photo in... from a quick bit of research... 1987 and would not be repealed until 15 years after the fact.

Changing it to a joke on a media production code that was not even active for 19 years before the image is, in fact, homophobic.

Changing it to literally anything would be homophobic. It's not about The Hays Code, it was never meant to be about The Hays Code. It's an insult to what that shirt was saying.

You don't edit someone's protest against their oppression for a laugh. And anyone who has so little respect is homophobic.

People get arrested by homophobic laws, lose there freedom and lose an incredible amount of opportunity if they hold a criminal record of any kind. There are presumably people still alive today who were arrested under that law.

Instead of a cutesie reference to film censorship it was an explicit statement of defiance of Maryland's criminalization gay sex, which was not repealed until 2002. This wasn't a guy saying "Oh they can't put what I do in the movies according to a completely voluntary industry code" he was saying "The State of Maryland wants to put me in jail for being gay and having gay sex."

1) 7 years ago, in 2019, Gooseworx used the common slang prefix for evil twins "nega," shortened from "negative" to refer to an evil version of a character, calling it a "nega-Angel."

2) People who actively hate this woman on levels even I struggle to comprehend concluded that this was her engaging in "antiblack racism" because the extremely common term which is used in children's cartoons to this day "nega-verse" sounds, if you aren't paying attention and you have some audio processing issues, a little like the anti-black slur "n*gger."

3) They proceeded to drum up a huge harassment campaign against her, using a handful of Black bloggers as meat-shields to feel righteous about their actions.

4) Her dipshit fuckhead fans then immediately began engaging in actual anti-Black racism against the above mentioned Black bloggers, and claiming they were doing so in defense of Gooseworx.

5) Gooseworx condemned the dipshit racist chucklefucks from point 4, pointing out that edgy humour used in private with trusted friends to make a mockery of racist shitheads is the exact opposite of engaging in hateful racist attacks on her behalf in fucking public. Though, frankly, calling "nega-verse" an 'edgy racist joke' is already an enourmous stretch, but good on her for cutting the dipshit fans off at the knees.

6) The harassment campaigners from point 3 had already managed to get enough eyes on her to get her spam-banned anyway, as evidenced by her account not having the "deactivated" suffix which appears in voluntary deletions.

So that's where we're at.

A bunch of white people using anti-Black racism as a cudgel to beat up a white trans woman at the cost of subjecting the people they are weaponizing to great fucking torment.

In conclusion:

i think its best described with the reactions to deltarune chapter 5 as well as the finale of the amazing digital circus.

everyone gets so caught up during the wait times with their own theories and head cannons about what direction THEY think the media should go, that they get disapointed- or worse; angry that it didnt go as they wished.

and its kinda,, pathetic and immature. its importanr to realize that long wait times are not the intended experience, theories shouldnt be required reading for enjoying the media in question