Sorry

They lack life experiences required to recognize they're being manipulated or abused and do not actually understand the intricate nature and structure of lies which makes them easy targets for con artists and abusers.

Their position within society is one in which they are viewed more as property than people and the rights they possess are deferred to their parents.

Their lack of experience with negative feedback results in a lack of scale causing them to respond to even minor inconveniences with dramatic rejection that could cause them to leap to a different extreme and harm themself unintentionally in the process.

Their position within society is one in which they are viewed more as property than people and the rights they possess are deferred to their parents.

Due to the formative nature of everything they experience being a baseline for their lives their isolation from socio-political topics reinforces a idealized youth, later in life, wherein politics "Weren't a thing" that leads them to desire to avoid the topic as adults.

Their position within society is one in which they are viewed more as property than people and the rights they possess are deferred to their parents.

Their constant need for stimulation as they grow results in an endless drive for novelty combined with a natural human response to dive into the familiar for comfort results in a deeply uncomfortable psychocsocial battle which can be paralyzing when even simple choices are presented making them apt to default to the desires of authority figures.

Children, by definition, are not yet adults. Might this imply that we think of children as not yet fully human?

The literature hints that this might be so. For example, Black people, Native Americans, and indigenous people of South America were likened to nonhuman animals and children by White people, in the past and now. Adults perceive infants’ mental capacities to be more similar to dogs’ or chimpanzees’ than to their own. Childlike is a marker of animalistic dehumanization when applied to social categories or individuals and perceived higher competence, agency, and civility predict lower dehumanization. Thus, empirically testing whether children are dehumanized seemed worthwhile.

[...]

The human becomings perspective places a strong emphasis on cultural knowledge and on complex, usually intellectual, abilities supposedly unique to humans. Schooling is an obvious way to pass a lot of that knowledge and abilities to younger generations. However, this emphasis puts several social categories at risk of being dehumanized. Social categories who routinely face social exclusion or lower academic achievement, such as Roma people in Europe, persons with learning disabilities, or people living in poverty, may be seen as not having become fully human, even as adults. Other social categories may suffer when one defines what it is to be human in relation to abilities, paving the way for the dehumanization of older adults, people with disabilities, mental disorders, and so on. All aforementioned social categories are infantilized to this day. Being blatantly compared with children or subtly treated in condescending ways is yet another risk of the human becomings perspective. However, whereas children will (presumably) eventually develop features that are seen as essentially human, members of those other social categories may never acquire them, alienating them even further from what it is believed to be human.

Interestingly, the notion that children are becomings, while adults are beings, does not only imply by contrast that children are not yet human beings, it also implies that adults are not ‘becoming’ anymore and reached an end-state as humans, as full members of the human category. This is not how most of the adults I know feel about themselves, rather that they are still ‘becoming’ who they are and will be as humans.

kris statlander, rhea ripley (look at her SHAPE), willow nightingale, ruby soho, these r just four off the top of my head that have obvious musculature and different body types. skye blue and julia hart have more slim cheerleader style bodies as well, i REALLY wanted to put emi sakura who is fucking STOUT (adoring) in this post but i couldn't find a good demonstrative pic, the list goes on

Sex work is not more emotionally intimate than all other forms of work. Emotional intimacy can be involved in therapy, care work, and writing about deeply personal topics.

Sex work is not the only form of work which can involve genital contact. This happens in medical environments, care work and when giving genital piercings.

Sex work is not uniquely dangerous. Fishing, construction and underwater welding all have high fatality and injury rates.

Sex work is not more prone to trafficking than all other forms of work. People are trafficked in huge numbers in the agricultural industry and for the manufacture of textiles.

Sex work is not the only form of work which involves frequent sexual harassment. People are often sexually harassed whilst doing bar work, waiting tables and providing health care and social assistance.

Sex work is not the only type of work that is criminalized. Other types of work like busking without a license, drug dealing, con artistry and any kind of job which requires authorisation form a third party where that isn't obtained.