This post [link] gave me an idea
This version will have an anti-contact stance, so it will be a reference to Fleur without being strictly tied to it (it meaning Fleur, not the stance). The intention is to have stronger plausible deniability. Although this may make it more ambiguous, having multiple options can be useful.
When asked if you like strawberries, you reply by mentioning the flowers.
"Do you like strawberries?" "I really like the flowers."
Maybe the ACPT version could be "do you like cherries" and the reply could be "I like the blossoms more."
I've been trying to come up with a "dogwhistle" for fleurs for a while now.
I think it would be something like
"Have you seen the tulips lately?"
"Yes, they thought about uniting for their freedom."
I feel like this is unique enough to never be stated in real life but someone wouldn't mistaken for a non-fleur answer.
Uniting=u in fleur (unite)
freedom=f in fleur
















