Someone recently asked me how I define the difference between aesir and rökkr in practical worship. For a question like this I like to use the example of Njord and Aegir. It's the easiest to show the relationship. This will be labeled as UPG, as I wouldn't consider this completely supported by archaeological source. (Also I am aware that njord is vanir in origin)
Both Njord and Aegir are "gods" of the sea. But Njord is the god of the sea in a way a fisherman might be, he commands the sea and it's bounty. His wealth comes from the sea. His home is the shoreline.
Aegir on the other hand is the sea. A primordial manifestation of the oceans power. Uncontrolled. An anthropomorphic representation.
This is how I tend define the roles of both aesir and thurs. It casts the aesir in the role of civilization, of building, of man. And in opposition the Jötnar as the wild and untamed natural forces.
I agree very much with that.
The only thing I don't agree with is that I don't see these two role as opposing. There shouldn't be an opposition, but a balance. Both forces are very much needed, by humankind and the world.
I'd argue that, if anything, Njord and Ægir are almost like, two sides of the same coin. The known and almost safety of the bay versus the unknown and the "wilderness" so to speak of the open ocean. They're both the sea, just two facets of it. Ægir's associations with hospitality and mead, and how he hosts parties for the æsir, is another point as to how I'd argue against the idea of this opposition idea, at least with Ægir specifically. Humanity is a part of nature, after all.
(Along this train of thought, Rán is a third side of that sea coin, associated with death at sea. She's the deep ocean to Ægir's open sea and Njord's bay, in my mind)
It is surprising for me how often I read posts here that have the impression that the aesir and the jötunn in some kind of constant war. Like half the aesir is married or sired by a jötunn. They party, they mingle and yeah, sure, sometimes there is also feuds and battles but that is not the norm and usually not framed as a good thing.
I think this is because a lot of us Aglophones (British, American, Canadian, Australian, etc) are so used to the idea of "dualism" in spirituality, nature, and society that we default to thinking of forces in terms of "two opposing sides," and it can be difficult for us to really break from it.
Rökkr is a movement that came about in North America in defiance of the way American Asatru intentionally excluded worship of jötnar—specifically jötnar that stand against the Aesir during Ragnarok. And American Asatru does this because it misinterprets Ragnarok as the Norse End Times, rather than understanding it for what it is: A cautionary tale about the conditions that create societal collapse.
(Most of these conditions were created by Odin casting out Loki's kids because of their natures, and for threating Loki like dogshit and threatening his life whenever his mischief caused them problems. Loki turning malicious was a consequence of the Aesir's actions... especially when we consider that Loki is an allegory for the behavior of children, and if we threaten kids for being kids they turn into vengeful adults.)
Unfortunately this has led to the impression amongst American heathens that this dualism inherently exists in Heathenry, rather than being the product of how American Asatru interprets Ragnarok.
Now, this isn't because American Asatruar are stupid. It's because, for many of them, a life of opposition is their lived experience. Many come from a background of being VERY heavily disenfranchized by both Christianity and society, so this is a paradigm that makes sense to them.
So...it's complicated.
So I think it's funny how this old post has suddenly gotten some attention for a few reasons. But I wanna add my own because either literally haven't thought about this blog in like idk 5 years.
1) all the above additions are good. It's your upg use it when you need it.
2) I will say this is more a commentary on practical use rather than just deity portfolio. But again it's your upg use it when you need it.
3) @skaldish is absplutwly right. I've been a practicing heathen now for probably 20 years, I've lost count. And this post and blog were specifically made at a time when the idea of INNANGARD AND UTANGARD were far more central in heathenry. And I think that's great, that you can see where a spirituality started and what trends are becoming more applicable or less applicable over time.
I'm from a time in heathenry when as a POC I couldn't even go anywhere for a group Blót because there wasn't a place where I could be safe in my region. Where the only heathenry available was white supremacist nonsense. So I think it's really great to see the evolution of this practice.
sdkfsjdflkjsdf I should have checked the dates my bad. But yeah, a lot has chanced in the past four years, and even more within the past 10.
















