Fianna Ai

The difference between XXL and 2X sizing. Finally explained! straight size vs "plus size" are different in construction.

Attention class. Today, as part of your survival training, we shall begin a six week crash course on understanding and interpreting Human actions and speech.

First, when meeting a Human, learn their name and identify who is their superior officer or employer. This is crucial for knowing who to contact when the Human does things not covered by the manual, the law, safety guidance, or common sense.

In addition, always ask the Human what they are doing, and tell them to explain it step by step as if you were a child. Even if, and especially if, you are an or even the expert on the subject matter, so that you can properly identify which parts of the process they have skipped or altered.

The phrase "It'll be awesome" or any variation of shall be treated as a critical threat to your and the surrounding area/planets safety. Contact all personnel and prepare an evacuation plan for when attempts to keep the Human in check fail.

If a Human says "I wouldn't do that if I were you." IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL ACTIONS AND REEVALUATE YOUR LIFE CHOICES!

For when a Human makes statements to the effects of "This looks bad" "We're in trouble" "Not ideal" "I dunno know about that" "Oops" "Oh shit" "I fucked up" IMMEDIATELY ASSESS THE SITUATION AND TRY TO REVERSE WHATEVER HAPPENED!

Identify which type of Human you are dealing with. Some Humans keep quiet and try to resolve situations on their own. They can often be left alone once you have a detailed profile of their competence and track record when resolving problems. However, if such a Human ever asks for help or calls an emergency, assume the Universe is about to explode and do everything you can to assist.

The other type of Human will engage in conversation with you and everyone on a regular basis and will ask for assistance on almost every activity, even if it is not needed. These Humans have a high companionship need and their effectiveness in basic activities decreases rapidly if left alone. Remember to sacrifice your time and attention for them, for the consequences of them becoming what is known as 'depressed' can be catastrophic.

Never trust a Human who says they 'fixed' something. Triple check everything, including anything that is even remotely connected to the thing they 'fixed' or you may find they have broken physics again.

Always be concerned when a Human is too quiet. Approach them with confectionery treats (do not smuggle in chocolate, it is a controlled substance and highly toxic to 99% of all life in the Universe) and/or pizza, and attempt to acquire information about what is going on.

he also said that it was incredibly unlikely that sexism will ever be resolved in the medical field. that the majority of medications i will ever take - even some of which are "for women" - will not be clinically tested on my body.

the problem, he said, was in getting any human clinical trial approved. to test on a body with a uterus - any body, even elderly patients or those who have been sterilized - was often nigh-impossible, because the concern was that the test patient may, at any point, become pregnant. once/if the patient became pregnant, the study would not be about "the effects of New Medication on the body." instead, the trial would fail - the results would be "the effects of New Medication on a developing fetus/pregnant patient."

it was massively easier, he said, to just test without accounting for a uterus. that's how he phrased it - accounting for a uterus.

at the time, i remember him talking about the ethical implications of testing on a developing fetus; how such testing could theoretically bankrupt a company if a lawsuit was filed. he talked about informed consent and about how long it took for any legislation to be passed about this - that in 1993; the year i was born, it finally became illegal to outright exclude women and minorities from clinical trials.

i remember him shrugging. "that's not to say it doesn't happen," he said. my ears were ringing.

i was thinking about how every time i have been rushed to the ER, the first thing they have asked me is if i am pregnant. when i broke my wrist at 16 years old - despite never having had sex - they made me wait three hours for the test to come back negative before they gave me pain meds. the possibility of a child haunts my health.

how many people have died on the table because they were waiting for the pregnancy test before treatment. how many people have died on the table because they were pregnant, and the only thing we care about is the fetus.

it is hard to explain to other people, but it feels like some kind of strange ghost. our entire lives, we are supposed to "save" our bodies for our future partners. but really we are just saving the body for the future child, aren't we? that hovering future-almost that cartwheels around in a miasma. you can't get your tubes tied, what if you change your mind? think of the child you must have, eventually.

Here are some basic primers. If someone is wearing what look like Meta glasses, they usually have a small circular camera in the outer corners of the lenses, like the one on your phone.

I would also regularly check their own product pages so you're on top of what the models look like. They tend to have larger frames, but come in a variety of shapes and colors.

A new hobbyist developed app warns if people nearby may be wearing smart glasses, such as Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses, which stalkers and harassers have repeatedly used to film people without their knowledge or consent. The app scans for smart glasses’ distinctive Bluetooth signatures and sends a push alert if it detects a potential pair of glasses in the local area.

The American Foundation for the Blind has said that "The Ray-Ban Meta glasses are an accessibility tool only by coincidence. That makes them more affordable and, in many ways, unaware of the needs of users with reduced vision" although they do have seemingly positive views on Meta Glasses as a whole. (source 10). It also seems like their marketing push as accessibility devices began last year (source 11).

But to add even more into the nonsense, Meta is now toying around with adding a "limit" to the functionality of their glasses unless their users pay for more access (source 12). AND, as stated above, Meta has officially added facial recognition code in their glasses and only admitted it after being called out, which is basically the death of privacy as we know it (source 13, source 14, source 15). And oh look another lawsuit because of it (source 16) THAT THEY LOST (source 17)!

Long story short: I don't begrudge someone using them as a disability aid overall, but ultimately both their privacy and other people's privacy are being disregarded by Meta and that is not and should not be acceptable by any means.

I understand there is no ethical consumption under capitalism but there is a level of personal responsibility someone has to take when using them if they truly truly need them, such as opting out of sharing information, not filming strangers without permission, not posting footage of strangers online, opting out of facial recognition if possible, etc.