⭒˖·̊. ݁mi vida va prohibida ݁·̊ .˖⭒

my blog is a safe space for me. the rest of you are in danger i think

rummaging for an earl grey teabag like its a cigarette

idk i would personally rather give up access to certain products seasonally or locally than have people enslaved to give me the ability to have any product any place any time. i think i can go without tomatoes in january.

ive never wanted to send a death threat over a game before

tautological wordle answer

posts that make you open wordle

Oh boy better go try today’s wordle

WHAT THE FUCK

I understand the urge to comment on recent trends in which people seem to want increasingly sanitized media compared to the recent past, but when you say things like "people used to just shrug and move on when there were books and movies that made them uncomfortable" it's like...well. actually people used to convict artists of obscenity in a court of law.

mike flanagan’s hill house could have been the best show in the world and it would still be a profoundly misogynistic reimagining of its source. the process of adaptation simply cannot be ignored, regardless of the adaptation’s quality as a standalone work; to adapt anything is to converse with it, and mike flanagan’s conversation with shirley jackson looks like reminding her that her place is in the family. the show is not propaganda, but it is inarguable that as a man and a patriarch, mike flanagan does socially benefit from absolving the gendered family structure of its place in the horror. likewise, he benefits from a telling of carrie where margaret white is ultimately benevolent, if misguided, and any trauma she may have experienced has simply made her wiser about “this world and the dangers” of which her naïve young daughter lacks awareness. i am not suggesting consciously conservative beliefs; i am acknowledging that he is likely unconsciously drawn to “fix” stories in this way because it further reifies his social position.